They didn't even allow JoePa to tell his side of the story in the press conf that was cancelled. They didn't want Joe dropping FACTS on them. Transparency my @$$
Apex, by your timeline we should be expecting a Superior Court ruling today right? Anyone heard anything differently?
They didn't even allow JoePa to tell his side of the story in the press conf that was cancelled. They didn't want Joe dropping FACTS on them. Transparency my @$$
What prevented him from holding his own press conference after 11/9? Seems like he could have dropped any facts he had then.They didn't even allow JoePa to tell his side of the story in the press conf that was cancelled. They didn't want Joe dropping FACTS on them. Transparency my @$$
Glad she's gone regardless of the reasonWonder if this is anything...or just a job change:
http://www.centredaily.com/2015/11/09/5007197_district-judge-leslie-dutchcot.html?rh=1
Once Curley and Schultz were indicted within 24 hours of Sandusky, it was going to be a public cluster f*** no matter what.
Add to that the comments of NoonanNot really. If the University leadership had done the expedient thing and shifted blame far away from Paterno/football and directed it at "some administrators who maintain their innocence", then they would have avoided the vast majority of public scrutiny or caring. Paterno was the center of the media firestorm because no one from PSU has the sense to defend him vehemently from the start -- which would have been reasonable since he wasn't charged with anything and was a witness for the prosecution -- and put the attention/blame on the faceless administrators.
What prevented him from holding his own press conference after 11/9? Seems like he could have dropped any facts he had then.
Add to that the comments of Noonan
I'm honestly curious what others here think. Granted most are still angry over some aspect of this but let's narrow things.
We've had our 'time to sit back and reflect' and I'd like to know if anyone thinks what Surma, Kenny and Peetz did four years ago has had any positive or negative results.
Fire away on the merits or drawbacks of beheading Joe Paterno on live, national TV.
I think most know where I come down on this subject but hey its a message board. And yes, I'm opening up an 'old wound' because frankly, this son of Pennsylvania doesn't believe its an old wound. The curative power of light has not been applied. The wound has been concealed by Mssrs. Freeh, Surma, Frazier and Peetz (she wants to be part of the boy's club).
Corbett and his henchmen on the BOT executed a well planned coup. Nothing about the entire incident was coincidence. Curley, Shultz and Spanier will never see their cases adjudicated. The Commonwealth never had a case.
It just doesn't make any sense that he was sitting on all these facts that would have saved his reputation and not hold a press conference or issue a statement containing this information. I understand he was very sick but are you saying he was capable of speaking at a presser one day and then suddenly incapable 24 hours later?His battle with a surging cancer, maybe? He was rushed to the hospital that very next weekend.
He did try to get his point across to a journalist (Jenkins) who they trusted, but then who later was shallow enough to swallow the Freeh report without a critical review of it. Plus, he was relaying his story to the author of his biography.
And what is the point of a coup against someone that you know will be gone soon even without a coup?
Not really. If the University leadership had done the expedient thing and shifted blame far away from Paterno/football and directed it at "some administrators who maintain their innocence", then they would have avoided the vast majority of public scrutiny or caring. Paterno was the center of the media firestorm because no one from PSU has the sense to defend him vehemently from the start -- which would have been reasonable since he wasn't charged with anything and was a witness for the prosecution -- and put the attention/blame on the faceless administrators.
It just doesn't make any sense that he was sitting on all these facts that would have saved his reputation and not hold a press conference or issue a statement containing this information. I understand he was very sick but are you saying he was capable of speaking at a presser one day and then suddenly incapable 24 hours later?
Apex, by your timeline we should be expecting a Superior Court ruling today right? Anyone heard anything differently?
I copied that from someone else who is far more up on the timelines. I believe that is from a post by JimmyW but I could be mistaken. To answer your question, I'm unsure as to what has transpired re: today's item. Perhaps Lundy or BJF knows?
It just doesn't make any sense that he was sitting on all these facts that would have saved his reputation and not hold a press conference or issue a statement containing this information. I understand he was very sick but are you saying he was capable of speaking at a presser one day and then suddenly incapable 24 hours later?
I got the 90 days from the 8/11 hearing from a media article after the hearing (cited below; there's a link also in Apex's sig). However, I saw nothing from a court document about a due date. So if we hear nothing about a ruling today - then I guess it's my bad for relying on a media article without its own citation!
FYI - I just so happened to talk to someone yesterday about whether an order was pending today. The response I got: "A decision from the Superior Court is not required to be issued within any particular time frame. It could be days or it could be weeks before we hear about their decision. The newspaper reporter who said they had 90 days was mistaken."
That reporter also got the tab on the scandal wrong. Penn State last reported a tab of $79.7M on June 30, 2014 which included only $24M of the NCAA fine and included none of the victim lawsuits, which was already $59.7M in October 2013. And it obviously does not include whatever was paid after the BOT emergency meeting to approve more settlements in April of this year. Penn State took the costs off their website sometime after March of this year
http://web.archive.org/web/20150330142704/http://progress.psu.edu/faqs
Article on 8/11/2015 hearing:
Curley, Spanier, Schultz appeals heard by Superior Court
http://abc27.com/2015/08/11/curley-spanier-schultz-appeals-heard-by-superior-court/
Superior Court has 90 days to rule on Tuesday’s arguments. The losing side is expected to appeal to the Supreme Court.
An actual trial, if it ever happens, is likely at least a year away.
Penn State University is picking up the legal fees for Curley, Schultz and Spanier since their alleged wrongdoing occurred in their official capacity as employees. ABC27 couldn’t get a specific breakout on the legal fees Tuesday, but a spokesman tells us that the total Sandusky-related tab is now $80 million, which includes fines, settlements, public relations and legal fees.
I'm honestly curious what others here think. Granted most are still angry over some aspect of this but let's narrow things.
We've had our 'time to sit back and reflect' and I'd like to know if anyone thinks what Surma, Kenny and Peetz did four years ago has had any positive or negative results.
Fire away on the merits or drawbacks of beheading Joe Paterno on live, national TV.
I think most know where I come down on this subject but hey its a message board. And yes, I'm opening up an 'old wound' because frankly, this son of Pennsylvania doesn't believe its an old wound. The curative power of light has not been applied. The wound has been concealed by Mssrs. Freeh, Surma, Frazier and Peetz (she wants to be part of the boy's club).
The Board articulated three key reasons for removing JVP from his coaching position:
1) His failure to do more when told about the suspected sexual assault in 2002.
2) His questioning of the board’s authority in the days following Jerry's arrest.
3) What they determined to be his inability to effectively continue coaching in the face of continuing questions surrounding the program.
From an institutional perspective, I believe the Board made the right decision to remove him from the job. To not have done so would have only further damaged the reputation of a university that prided itself on being a cut above most others.
I'm honestly curious what others here think. Granted most are still angry over some aspect of this but let's narrow things.
We've had our 'time to sit back and reflect' and I'd like to know if anyone thinks what Surma, Kenny and Peetz did four years ago has had any positive or negative results.
Fire away on the merits or drawbacks of beheading Joe Paterno on live, national TV.
The Board articulated three key reasons for removing JVP from his coaching position:
1) His failure to do more when told about the suspected sexual assault in 2002.
2) His questioning of the board’s authority in the days following Jerry's arrest.
3) What they determined to be his inability to effectively continue coaching in the face of continuing questions surrounding the program.
From an institutional perspective, I believe the Board made the right decision to remove him from the job. To not have done so would have only further damaged the reputation of a university that prided itself on being a cut above most others.
I'm honestly curious what others here think. Granted most are still angry over some aspect of this but let's narrow things.
We've had our 'time to sit back and reflect' and I'd like to know if anyone thinks what Surma, Kenny and Peetz did four years ago has had any positive or negative results.
Fire away on the merits or drawbacks of beheading Joe Paterno on live, national TV.
I think most know where I come down on this subject but hey its a message board. And yes, I'm opening up an 'old wound' because frankly, this son of Pennsylvania doesn't believe its an old wound. The curative power of light has not been applied. The wound has been concealed by Mssrs. Freeh, Surma, Frazier and Peetz (she wants to be part of the boy's club).
I'll play.
There were no merits to anything they did that evening. Zip. Zero. Nada.
Ken Frazier told the BoT that he had experience with Grand Juries, and that it was something not to be taken too seriously & he could handle things. So of course they gave Frazier the reins.
In my dreams, Ken Frazier places a full page ad in the NYT with an apology to the Paterno Family, the Football Lettermen, the 3 principals he torched - Graham Spanier, Tim Curley and Gary Schultz ; and to the larger PSU community.
I'm still angry. I am stunned at the level of panic these so-called Corporate Titans exhibited, their continued hubris, arrogance, narcissm and the tone deafness. Surma and Frazier could have told the Media to shut up, sit down and wait for the facts to play out. But they did not.
I wonder, if with benefit of hindsight, John Surma wishes he had done less.
http://notpsu.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-surma-vendetta.html
http://notpsu.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-surma-vendetta-part-2.html
http://notpsu.blogspot.com/search/label/John Surma
Or had used the pill, and/or a barrier.With the benefit of hindsight, I wish John Surma's mother had a headache.
The Board articulated three key reasons for removing JVP from his coaching position:
1) His failure to do more when told about the suspected sexual assault in 2002.
2) His questioning of the board’s authority in the days following Jerry's arrest.
3) What they determined to be his inability to effectively continue coaching in the face of continuing questions surrounding the program.
From an institutional perspective, I believe the Board made the right decision to remove him from the job. To not have done so would have only further damaged the reputation of a university that prided itself on being a cut above most others.
The Board articulated three key reasons for removing JVP from his coaching position:
1) His failure to do more when told about the suspected sexual assault in 2002.
2) His questioning of the board’s authority in the days following Jerry's arrest.
3) What they determined to be his inability to effectively continue coaching in the face of continuing questions surrounding the program.
From an institutional perspective, I believe the Board made the right decision to remove him from the job. To not have done so would have only further damaged the reputation of a university that prided itself on being a cut above most others.
The article regarding the 90 days limit was indeed mistaken - go figure a journalist that had no idea what they are talking about
There is no time table set for this ruling - The 90 days is only a superior court internal guideline but by no means does it mean it is a requirement -
Except the problem is that Masshole and Frazier later testified that they fired him solely for public relations reasons, which means they lied to and on behalf of the Penn State community about the circumstances of his dismissal. There was a time when somebody who was discovered to have lied could no longer function socially and, even today, the USMA will expel a cadet for lying.
Given the events going on around the world where people are getting murdered and it's recorded for the whole world to see, your choice of words are very poor. It certainly points to your lack of maturity and self-awareness.I'm honestly curious what others here think. Granted most are still angry over some aspect of this but let's narrow things.
We've had our 'time to sit back and reflect' and I'd like to know if anyone thinks what Surma, Kenny and Peetz did four years ago has had any positive or negative results.
Fire away on the merits or drawbacks of beheading Joe Paterno on live, national TV.
I think most know where I come down on this subject but hey its a message board. And yes, I'm opening up an 'old wound' because frankly, this son of Pennsylvania doesn't believe its an old wound. The curative power of light has not been applied. The wound has been concealed by Mssrs. Freeh, Surma, Frazier and Peetz (she wants to be part of the boy's club).
K & K used the word SOLELY in their testimony? You know that's not true Bill. That makes you a liar in which case you are expelled from the McAndrew Board.
?Given the events going on around the world where people are getting murdered and it's recorded for the whole world to see, your choice of words are very poor. It certainly points to your lack of maturity and self-awareness.
His choice of words obviously bothers you