Doubt he'd feel any guilt
But does the known risks impact people from speeding? No because the likelihood of death or even punishment is slim.
This still goes back to "cheating". If the NCAA doesn't enforce the rules then why have them? They aren't real. They're for sure. Like a 35 mph speed limit when almost everyone goes 40-50.
Why have a law that makes shooting you in the face a crime if he could do it and potentially face no consequences?
The known risks do stop most people. Would you drive 100 in a 35 if you knew there were no cops? What if your kids were in the backseat? What's the difference between 100 in a 35 and 40 in a 35? If there isn't one then everyone would drive 100, but they don't, because the risk increases along with the speed. That said, literally no one has ever died from going too fast so this is a dumb line of reasoning.
People don't do lots of things for reasons that have nothing to do with potential legal consequences.