Originally posted by demlion:
worse than calling it knucklehead behavior, so there is no doubt you would agree with that too. Name the person I am judging. Lots of people here have said if this is true then it is really, really bad. that is all I am saying, except to call out the victim blamers like yourself.
Honestly, your post is barely comprehensible.
Let's have a test. You teach your daughter to pass out and fraternities, and I'll teach my daughter not to . . . like I said I would. Let's compare notes in a few years.
Every year hundreds of girls whose fathers have taught them not to get drunk and pass out at fraternities do so anyways. Maybe your little princess heeds your advice, maybe she doesn't. Do you want to find that she doesn't because some criminal has taken her picture and posted it on the internet?Originally posted by Pardlion:
Originally posted by demlion:
worse than calling it knucklehead behavior, so there is no doubt you would agree with that too. Name the person I am judging. Lots of people here have said if this is true then it is really, really bad. that is all I am saying, except to call out the victim blamers like yourself.
Honestly, your post is barely comprehensible.
Let's have a test. You teach your daughter to pass out and fraternities, and I'll teach my daughter not to . . . like I said I would. Let's compare notes in a few years.
There you go again with your righteous indignity. Let me help you out:Originally posted by Aoshiro:
Every year hundreds of girls whose fathers have taught them not to get drunk and pass out at fraternities do so anyways. Maybe your little princess heeds your advice, maybe she doesn't. Do you want to find that she doesn't because some criminal has taken her picture and posted it on the internet?Originally posted by Pardlion:
Originally posted by demlion:
worse than calling it knucklehead behavior, so there is no doubt you would agree with that too. Name the person I am judging. Lots of people here have said if this is true then it is really, really bad. that is all I am saying, except to call out the victim blamers like yourself.
Honestly, your post is barely comprehensible.
Let's have a test. You teach your daughter to pass out and fraternities, and I'll teach my daughter not to . . . like I said I would. Let's compare notes in a few years.
Victim-blaming is BS.
+1, dem.Originally posted by demlion:
across the country feel suitably shamed at your victim-blaming.
LOL. You guys are like two cranky old men making up your own conversation despite what is being said around you. I'm not even sure why you started in on the getting drugged topic, since it was never an issue. I think it made you feel like white knights though, so whatev.Originally posted by LafayetteBear:
+1, dem.Originally posted by demlion:
across the country feel suitably shamed at your victim-blaming.
Wow.Originally posted by Southeastern PA Buck:
This kind of stuff has been going on if the Greek community for a while. So now instead of just the brothers having access to these photos they are being "shared" on the internet.
You're right. It's not legal. It's not moral. It has to stop.Originally posted by Aoshiro:
Wow.Originally posted by Southeastern PA Buck:
This kind of stuff has been going on if the Greek community for a while. So now instead of just the brothers having access to these photos they are being "shared" on the internet.
I don't care how long they've been doing it. It's not legal. And it's morally reprehensible. And if this happened to your daughter I doubt that you'd be so cavalier about it.
Again, nothing in my post is wrong. I simply said it's been going on at PSU and other places with a Greek system for many generations. I never said it was legal or moral. I am simply pointing out that people acting like this is something new or different than what has been done in the past have been living in a bubble for the last 100 years.Originally posted by Aoshiro:
Wow.Originally posted by Southeastern PA Buck:
This kind of stuff has been going on if the Greek community for a while. So now instead of just the brothers having access to these photos they are being "shared" on the internet.
I don't care how long they've been doing it. It's not legal. And it's morally reprehensible. And if this happened to your daughter I doubt that you'd be so cavalier about it.
Pardlion: Your post above, is the first post in which YOU made that distinction. Further, your statement that you never used the words "knucklehead behavior" in a post is parsing worthy of Bill Clinton. Dem had submitted a post stating that posting a passed out woman's nude photos to the Net without her permission is clearly beyond "knucklehead behavior," and your response to Dem began with the words "It is?" Nice try.Originally posted by Pardlion:
There you go again with your righteous indignity. Let me help you out:Originally posted by Aoshiro:
Every year hundreds of girls whose fathers have taught them not to get drunk and pass out at fraternities do so anyways. Maybe your little princess heeds your advice, maybe she doesn't. Do you want to find that she doesn't because some criminal has taken her picture and posted it on the internet?Originally posted by Pardlion:
Originally posted by demlion:
worse than calling it knucklehead behavior, so there is no doubt you would agree with that too. Name the person I am judging. Lots of people here have said if this is true then it is really, really bad. that is all I am saying, except to call out the victim blamers like yourself.
Honestly, your post is barely comprehensible.
Let's have a test. You teach your daughter to pass out and fraternities, and I'll teach my daughter not to . . . like I said I would. Let's compare notes in a few years.
Victim-blaming is BS.
Victim-blaming would be if someone says: it's the girls own fault because she passed out at a fraternity house.
On the other hand, it's smart to teach women not to pass out at fraternity houses.
You should learn the distinction. It might come in handy for you someday.
LOL, my bad. I posted that you said "It is?" when what you actually said was "Is it?" 23rd post in this thread, for those keeping score at home.Originally posted by Pardlion:
Lol. Can't you and lafayettebear get your versions of what I said straight. You both have two different quotes. Lolol.
pandaczar12: I can answer that question. Most college social fraternities (whether they are local chapters of national fraternities or merely local fraternities, meaning they are on single campus only) are affiliated with the university in the sense that they enter into signed "recognition" or "affiliation" agreements with the university. (KDR's PSU chapter is an affiliated chapter.) These agreements typically spell out the various minimum responsibilities of the fraternity and the kind of supervision and sponsorship to be provided by the university (e.g., access to student admit lists, participation in a university sponsored "formal rush" week in the fall), More importantly, at least from the university's standpoint, such agreements also call for the fraternity to indemnify the university for claims and damages attributable to the fraternity's operations, and oblgate the fraternity to add the university as an "additional insured" on the fraternity's general liability insurance policy.Originally posted by pandaczar12:
A general question for anyone who can answer... I asked once already but haven't seen a response. Are Frats actually affiliated with the university? Other than the members being students? Is this actually a PSU frat... or just a frat at PSU?
You are an idiot who can't even figure out how to use thread view.Originally posted by Pardlion:
You couldn't even get a two word quote right? Sweet Jesus.
So your point is that there's a significant difference between "It is?" and "Is it?" Like Dem said, I know victim blaming when I see it. I was offering you an olive branch, but you chose not to take it. Whatever.Originally posted by Pardlion:
You couldn't even get a two word quote right? Sweet Jesus.
This may not be a pretty big deal to you, but I'd encourage you to talk to the women in your life about whether they think that unknowingly having their naked pictures shared on the internet constitutes a "vicious assault."Originally posted by pmjoe:
So far the stories suggest the people involved will be charged with multiple misdemeanors. That will screw their lives over pretty good, and deservedly so. Hopefully nothing worse took place there.
With the hype though, you'd think someone was murdered or viciously assaulted. It's sad we live in a world where being photographed naked is sensationalized into some horrific front page crime to the point we ignore other problems in the world.
You actually believe they should detain everyone because your kid lost his phone? If he loses it at beaver stadium should they stop the game and not let everyone leave until it is found? I bet you would be the first parent to complain if another kid lost his cell phone and the school would not let your kid leave. You kid claims it was stolen. He might have just lost it. How long should they have held everyone? They would not have done that back in the day because they had a concept called personal responsibility. Back in the day when my new pair of shoes were taken out of my locker during practice my parents did expect them to lock down the school and detain everyone. They told me it was my fault and for the rest of the year I wore old shoes. If your child is unable to keep a cell phone due to his disability then perhaps you need to reconsider him having one instead of expecting the school to cater to you.Originally posted by SRATH:
My disabled son is at a mini-Thon at his high school. He is in the bathroom and sets his phone down....finishes his business and leaves without his phone. When he goes back, it is gone. The teachers don't stop the event and folks are allowed to leave. When I was in school, nobody would have been allowed to leave until the phone was returned. When we complain to the school, the response is, "what do you expect....if you leave you phone someplace, you should expect it to be gone". Like my kid did something wrong. Somebody steals a phone from a disabled kid at an event to raise money for cancer, and he is the bad guy.
The Commonwealth says its a misdemeanor offense, FWIW.Originally posted by Aoshiro:
This may not be a pretty big deal to you, but I'd encourage you to talk to the women in your life about whether they think that unknowingly having their naked pictures shared on the internet constitutes a "vicious assault."Originally posted by pmjoe:
So far the stories suggest the people involved will be charged with multiple misdemeanors. That will screw their lives over pretty good, and deservedly so. Hopefully nothing worse took place there.
With the hype though, you'd think someone was murdered or viciously assaulted. It's sad we live in a world where being photographed naked is sensationalized into some horrific front page crime to the point we ignore other problems in the world.
People really need to stop downplaying the gravity of this. It's not a good look.