While I disagree with Crusin in his premise of Joe's responsibilities in that situation, his point is illuminating. There are a pretty large number of folks out there who think the same way--and it's an emotional feeling, I think, due to kids getting hurt.These are folks in many cases who are very reasonable individuals and are not in bed with the BOT. They want someone to blame. That would not have changed had Joe retired early and is unlikely to change even if Joe is exonerated by the lawsuits.
You make a good point; sexual abuse of children is one of the few true taboos left in our society, and people do react strongly. However, over a period of time, with a fuller understanding of events, and rational thinking, the position of initial blame should be questioned.
CR66 has been close to the case for years, and proclaims himself as one of high intelligence. Yet, he remains intransigent in blaming Joe and absolving the BOT. We have to conclude he either has an agenda or is a total blockhead.