Get some sleep. These posts by Chief and Turk are offending exactly 1 person here.You know you are desperate when you are out there celebrating a bogus win, by some kid who isn't even on your team.
Lean times eh Chief? LMAO.
Get some sleep. These posts by Chief and Turk are offending exactly 1 person here.You know you are desperate when you are out there celebrating a bogus win, by some kid who isn't even on your team.
Lean times eh Chief? LMAO.
Get some sleep. These posts by Chief and Turk are offending exactly 1 person here.
I am stealing this GIF aswell! Can't believe I haven't seen it yet lolChief, that guy looks kinda like Mark Perry when he faces up. Just sayin'.
Otherwise, I am so stealing this.
Actually, IMar made me look rather foolish today. Nothing wrong with enjoying a high level match and calling it as you see it. You have 21 Guns, quit shooting BBs or go back to the football or basketball page.
Whoa now chief! Why you gotta bring that up? That was unacceptable!!I think one of those is right.Awesome, amiright? As for the Perry thing, I prefer to see it in a "Tears of Joy" kind of way after he beat Hendricks even though he did pull the old Bull Durham meeting at the pitcher's mound trick today.
Get some sleep. These posts by Chief and Turk are offending exactly 1 person here.
MD seems like a lot against a dominate returning national champ don't you think?
I don't know that IMar was using the front headlock to get a breather, I thought he was using it for the same reason Nolf used the head snaps in the first match-up: to wear out the other guy. Also, I thought Perry had a point about Imar getting hit with the stall warning when he was still inbounds, and does anyone know why the takedown was reversed? My point is just that we can point to things on either side, but either way it was a great match and I hope to see these kids in the NCAA finals!
It sure looked like a takedown. I thought I heard someone (one of the refs?) say something like "He only had one leg." That didn't make sense to me...looked like he had both...and maybe I heard it wrong, but the only other guess I had would have been that they had been ruled out of bounds at some point during the flurry. Again...didn't look like it, but I never saw a view that would have ruled that possibility out.
SR/BHF
I don't know that IMar was using the front headlock to get a breather, I thought he was using it for the same reason Nolf used the head snaps in the first match-up: to wear out the other guy. Also, I thought Perry had a point about Imar getting hit with the stall warning when he was still inbounds, and does anyone know why the takedown was reversed? My point is just that we can point to things on either side, but either way it was a great match and I hope to see these kids in the NCAA finals!
I honestly believe the loss will absolutely Jason. There will be a strategy change but I'm not sure it involves pushing the pace more. Nolf was also gassed IMO at the end of the match. He just has to stay out of the tie ups which favor IMAR. Great match
The closer the rematch is to weigh ins, the better it is for Nolf. If it's in the finals, you're going to see an absolute war just like this one.
Yeah, hence my question above.The closer the rematch is to weigh ins, the better it is for Nolf. If it's in the finals, you're going to see an absolute war just like this one.
Weigh-ins are at 10:00 AM each day of competition.Yeah, hence my question above.
IMAR's strategy was to slow Nolf down by tying him up and to grab his ankle when they got in a scramble and hope for a stalemate. It worked exactly how Perry had hoped it would work. IIRC IMAR was saved once maybe twice (can't remember) when the period ended as it looked like Nolf was seconds away from getting two. If people don't believe that Perry was trying to buy IMAR some time due to his challenge then they aren't being completely honest. Who has ever challenged a stall warning before especially when its a judgement call by the ref? It was called correctly in regards to how they are calling it this year. I thought the warning on Nico was bogus, but it's a judgement call by the ref. Nolf needs to create more scrambles, but do it earlier in the period so that he has more time to potentially score.
I thought J-No very clearly had the TD at the end of the 2nd. Not only that but after he had the TD, I believe I-Mar exposed himself to grab his leg. Nolf absolutely got squarely behind I-Mar with two points of contact on each of I-Mar's sides.
If you look at the replays, it appears that J-No is locked onto one-leg up high (effectively where a high-crotch would be). As they are rolling, Nolf's hand and arm become hidden, but when they become view-able again, you can see Jason locked on the leg. I believe that is why they waived the TD off. At the end of the video, Jason lets go of the leg and tries to get OB and this is where I-Mar grabs both his legs, BUT I don't think this part of the action applied because Nolf had let go of the leg because the official had already awarded a TD incorrectly (e.g., at the time the TD was called, Nolf still had the high-crotch locked - he only released it and attempted to go OB after the official incorrectly called the TD, that is why the action following the point at which the TD was called does not figure into the "challenge review" - only the situation at the moment the official called the TD counts and it was not a TD at the time the official made the call because Nolf had a high crotch locked in and I-Mar did not have the TD).