I seem to remember seeing a Penn State player being flagged (Defensive holding) for this type of play but, I can't be sure. Iowa's DEs did this repeatedly on Saturday. This play it was Epenesa going against Fries but, they also did it to Nelson.
Question for you as I know you have a background in coaching ....Nothing wrong with that play, defense can use their hands
I seem to remember seeing a Penn State player being flagged (Defensive holding) for this type of play but, I can't be sure. Iowa's DEs did this repeatedly on Saturday. This play it was Epenesa going against Fries but, they also did it to Nelson.
I believe it was. I believe Johnson would typically run a corner route in that concept, and he told Joe that the defender was all over the corner route all day. They drew it up on the fly for Johnson to run the post and he knew he would be open as the defender was expecting the corner. Trace was looking for Johnson all the way.Question for you as I know you have a background in coaching ....
Do you really think the last play was run exactly as drawn up or did someone run a wrong route considering we had three receivers and three defenders in a very tight box? I can see where JJ's route would have made sense if one or two of the receivers on the left went left, but to have all three wind up in the same general area was really asking for the pass to be tipped or batted down, imo.
Scroll down I linked a YouTube of JM diagraming what I believe is this play (but not the drawn up in the dirt variation) while he was at Fordham if it wasn't this play it was closeI believe it was. I believe Johnson would typically run a corner route in that concept, and he told Joe that the defender was all over the corner route all day. They drew it up on the fly for Johnson to run the post and he knew he would be open as the defender was expecting the corner. Trace was looking for Johnson all the way.
I did watch that. I believe it was the same concept or very close. Backside drag and stick route, with frontside go/post and corner. Barkley stayed in to block so it appears to be modified for short yardage. Just a great play, and credit for JoMo for listening to his players, and for the players being smart enough to suggest a new concept they knew would work.Scroll down I linked a YouTube of JM diagraming what I believe is this play (but not the drawn up in the dirt variation) while he was at Fordham if it wasn't this play it was close
Sure the defensive player can use his hands, but it sure looks like he grabs Fries' jersey and pulls him to the ground. The OL can use their hands too, but I'd bet that play would be called holding if Fries did what was done to him. It's really legal for the DL to pull down like that?
YesSure the defensive player can use his hands, but it sure looks like he grabs Fries' jersey and pulls him to the ground. The OL can use their hands too, but I'd bet that play would be called holding if Fries did what was done to him. It's really legal for the DL to pull down like that?
Question for you as I know you have a background in coaching ....
Do you really think the last play was run exactly as drawn up or did someone run a wrong route considering we had three receivers and three defenders in a very tight box? I can see where JJ's route would have made sense if one or two of the receivers on the left went left, but to have all three wind up in the same general area was really asking for the pass to be tipped or batted down, imo.
Perfectly fine and well executed. When the OL gets off balance you pull around them using their loss of leverage to your advantage. If Fries grabbed hold of him to prevent him from going around him, then yes Fries would have and should have been called for holding.
Question for you as I know you have a background in coaching ....
Do you really think the last play was run exactly as drawn up or did someone run a wrong route considering we had three receivers and three defenders in a very tight box? I can see where JJ's route would have made sense if one or two of the receivers on the left went left, but to have all three wind up in the same general area was really asking for the pass to be tipped or batted down, imo.
They weren't in the exact same area. The wide receiver from the left side ran a "shallow" crossing slant pattern. Juwan Johnson ran a "hard post" from the slot. The "wide receiver" on Johnson's side also ran a parallel post to Johnson and was at least 10 yards to his right at the point JJ caught the ball. IOW, they were all running routes at "different levels" allowing McSorley to identify the best mis-match to throw to. The ball was clearly being thrown to Johnson not the receiver running the shallow crossing route from other side.
Your notion that there were lots of defenders around Johnson at the point in his route where he catches the ball is laughable and simply NOT TRUE - go watch the play in slow motion, Johnson's defender was completely burned on the inside cut and was at least 3 yards behind Johnson and to his right side (i.e. not on the inside where the ball was thrown)
I like this PaFootbalguy's input. Solid new poster (at least I haven't seen his posts before).
I hope you stick around this insane asylum
Why does every response of yours sound like you want to argue?They weren't in the exact same area. The wide receiver from the left side ran a "shallow" crossing slant pattern. Juwan Johnson ran a "hard post" from the slot. The "wide receiver" on Johnson's side also ran a parallel post to Johnson and was at least 10 yards to his right at the point JJ caught the ball. IOW, they were all running routes at "different levels" allowing McSorley to identify the best mis-match to throw to. The ball was clearly being thrown to Johnson not the receiver running the shallow crossing route from other side.
Your notion that there were lots of defenders around Johnson at the point in his route where he catches the ball is laughable and simply NOT TRUE - go watch the play in slow motion, Johnson's defender was completely burned on the inside cut and was at least 3 yards behind Johnson and to his right side (i.e. not on the inside where the ball was thrown)
They weren't in the exact same area. The wide receiver from the left side ran a "shallow" crossing slant pattern. Juwan Johnson ran a "hard post" from the slot. The "wide receiver" on Johnson's side also ran a parallel post to Johnson and was at least 10 yards to his right at the point JJ caught the ball. IOW, they were all running routes at "different levels" allowing McSorley to identify the best mis-match to throw to. The ball was clearly being thrown to Johnson not the receiver running the shallow crossing route from other side.
Your notion that there were lots of defenders around Johnson at the point in his route where he catches the ball is laughable and simply NOT TRUE - go watch the play in slow motion, Johnson's defender was completely burned on the inside cut and was at least 3 yards behind Johnson and to his right side (i.e. not on the inside where the ball was thrown)
Clearly CJF does not know what he's talking about!!Here are your words:
Your notion that there were lots of defenders around Johnson at the point in his route where he catches the ball is laughable and simply NOT TRUE
I found the transcript from Franklin's press conference yesterday. Here are his exact words:
Everybody is talking about that last play. I think that last play is probably a really good example of why we didn't execute as well as we would have liked in the red zone. If you watch that ball thrown, there's like eight people going for that ball, defensive players, offensive players. Our distribution wasn't really good. On the back side, our routes, we're kind of shortcutting routes, we're rolling routes. We're not getting to our depth. So that's why you saw way too many people near the ball.
Clearly, someone should tell Franklin that he doesn't know what he is talking about and there's a guy (Bushy, FRTT, etc.) on the PSU message board that knows better than him.
Why does every response of yours sound like you want to argue?