They feel a little like some of the Wisconsin teams of old. Run first, big tough O-line, sure, their qb is way more dynamic. I think we are going to have to beat them with speed, under Franklin we haven't proven we can out-tough an opponent like this. We should really have a pretty good understanding of what Harbs is trying to do because he ain't changed much. Ohio state, up until last year, whipped these guys with crossing routes and speed. I think we are going to need to throw a lot, im not sure our run game can be relayed upon yet in this type of environment.
I mean, it's as "good of a matchup" as we can probably get against a top 10 team. Michigan's not intimidating. They're beatable. We have to limit turnovers (can't see a repeat of the Northwestern game) and control the time of possession.Michigan strengths are O line and pass rush
Boy, not a critical reader at all. I said Franklin hasn't "out toughed" an opponent like this, hat on a hat, run when we need to. He has done well against Wisconsin and I think he can using the same principles against Michigan . Speed and the passing game.Franklin has struggled against Wisconsin??? Really? Franklin is 3-0 against Wisconsin @PSU including beating them in the CCG.
Well, as a team they have 15 sacks so far.Michigan lost their two great DEs from last season, so their pass rush is no where near as good as last year. The whole team is overrated and McCarthy is unimpressive. I like our chances.
In six games, against shabby competition, that doesn’t impress me.Well, as a team they have 15 sacks so far.
And 7 of those sacks came today vs Indiana. Like you said, shabby competitionIn six games, against shabby competition, that doesn’t impress me.
And 7 of those sacks came today vs Indiana. Like you said, shabby competition
To be fair, Penn St struggled against NorthwesternAnd 7 of those sacks came today vs Indiana. Like you said, shabby competition
Can’t wait to come back and call this outPretty simple Michigan’s defense line will smoke Psu offensive line won’t be close 27 -10
No, Penn State does not need to play "flawless". Nobody plays "flawless".Um is beatable, PSU has to play flawless and no stupid Special Teams calls or turnovers.
That's pretty much flawless lolNo, Penn State does not need to play "flawless". Nobody plays "flawless".
Penn State needs a good game plan, win or tie the turnover margin, and convert inside the red zone.
Penn State lost FIVE turnovers in ONE game and STILL won by 10 points. You're misusing the term "struggle".To be fair, Penn St struggled against Northwestern
No, it's not. It's solid football.That's pretty much flawless lol
To be fair, Penn St struggled against Northwestern
Think about this: Northwestern produced a total of 22 yards in the five possessions after the five turnovers...In a monsoon where they turned the ball over 5 times..... never trailed, led by two scores most of the game and ended up winning by two scores.
To clarify--if Michigan and Penn State play "solid football" who wins?No, it's not. It's solid football.
Whoever plays better in the red zone.To clarify--if Michigan and Penn State play "solid football" who wins?
Bro, Northwestern is terrible. Beating them by only 10 is not goodPenn State lost FIVE turnovers in ONE game and STILL won by 10 points. You're misusing the term "struggle".
Five turnovers. Quick, name all the power five teams who won this year with five turnovers. I'll wait...no I won't because I already know the answer is one. PSU. Nobody elseBro, Northwestern is terrible. Beating them by only 10 is not good
I think you are wrong on both counts. The transfer LBer/DE from Alabama is coming on strong. They have very strong DL. McCarthy is very mobile and throws accurately on the run. PSU has to keep Corum from breakout runs and keep McCarthy hemmed in as he seems to be a more dangerous passer when scrambling. Michigan also has an excellent group of receivers.Michigan lost their two great DEs from last season, so their pass rush is no where near as good as last year. The whole team is overrated and McCarthy is unimpressive. I like our chances.
So, we probably have to play better than solid football. I agree it's basically a toss up but I don't think "solid" football is enough for either team to win. Both have to bring their A game if they're going to win. Neither team is going to be sleepwalking through this one.Whoever plays better in the red zone.
Yea be fair with your assessment. Penn State struggled because of weather. I know , NW played in the rain too. Anyone who is being honest knows that if it's dry out for that game, there is no struggle.To be fair, Penn St struggled against Northwestern
Michigan has 15 sacks against lousy competition. If you look even deeper, their D Linemen are responsible for THREE of those 15 sacks. The rest are DBs/LBs. If Clifford is on his game, we don’t lose the turnover battle and the Referines are not a factor, we win.I think you are wrong on both counts. The transfer LBer/DE from Alabama is coming on strong. They have very strong DL. McCarthy is very mobile and throws accurately on the run. PSU has to keep Corum from breakout runs and keep McCarthy hemmed in as he seems to be a more dangerous passer when scrambling. Michigan also has an excellent group of receivers.
For PSU to win:
--Limit Corums big plays
--Contain McCarthy in the pocket
--PSU must pass protect on both sides of the OL Wallace must have a strong game
--Clifford must look more consistently to passing to RB, play calm limiting overthrows and no INTs
--PSU has to establish both inside/outside running game
--DL has to limit UM run game, LBers defend middle of the field and has to be pressure on McCarthy.
This game is definitely winnable for PSU.
Meanwhile, Northwestern is getting stomped 42-7 by a terrible Wisconsin team.Yea be fair with your assessment. Penn State struggled because of weather. I know , NW played in the rain too. Anyone who is being honest knows that if it's dry out for that game, there is no struggle.
Yeah but it's a Wisconsin team that is playing for the coach they want to keep long term. We sleepwalked through most of that game and the outcome was never truly in doubt. I don't see any concern from that game.Meanwhile, Northwestern is getting stomped 42-7 by a terrible Wisconsin team.
I’m concerned about coaching if we slept walked as you put itYeah but it's a Wisconsin team that is playing for the coach they want to keep long term. We sleepwalked through most of that game and the outcome was never truly in doubt. I don't see any concern from that game.
I’m concerned about coaching if we slept walked as you put it
Why? It was the game against an awful team before a bye week and Michigan. That happens like it happened to Harbaugh today. Georgia did it for 2 weeks before Auburn. Thankfully NW was so bad it didn't matter to the point where we didn't even have to turn it on late to win.I’m concerned about coaching if we slept walked as you put it
Russell Wilson say hi.They feel a little like some of the Wisconsin teams of old. Run first, big tough O-line, sure, their qb is way more dynamic. I think we are going to have to beat them with speed, under Franklin we haven't proven we can out-tough an opponent like this. We should really have a pretty good understanding of what Harbs is trying to do because he ain't changed much. Ohio state, up until last year, whipped these guys with crossing routes and speed. I think we are going to need to throw a lot, im not sure our run game can be relayed upon yet in this type of environment.
Oh my God, yes, Russell's 2 years not withstanding.Russell Wilson say hi.
Meanwhile Purdue just beat Maryland on the road.Meanwhile, Northwestern is getting stomped 42-7 by a terrible Wisconsin team.