-nus? or -na?
Curious choice of words. One could read all kinds of meanings into it.
Jemele Hill goes after Scott Paterno on twitter, avoids his point
- Thread starter TenerHallTerror
- Start date
Curious choice of words. One could read all kinds of meanings into it.
Ok, well then whoever was involved in the coverup would have found out and started corresponding with each other. Surely, if you believe in 2001 they could send e-mails blatantly stating they didn't intend to notify the police, DPW, CYS, or TSM, they'd be as dumb to tell each other "oops, looks like Corbett is on to us."
You are not one that should be critical of someone's concept of memory. You have asked the same question 40 times and can't seem to remember the answer. You seem to have difficulty with that simple concept.
You might state that Paterno was the most powerful man in the state or on campus. I do not.
This isn't match.com. Take your perversions elsewhere.
Joe WAS very powerful. He had, what amounted to, absolute power, but he used it to help people. He used his power to make a real difference, a POSITIVE difference, in the lives of so many, many, many people. He touched so many lives in such a positive way. He was a great, great man, and to me, he will not be defined by the heinous crimes of a monster, who was an evil mastermind who hid in plain sight, and fooled an entire community and it's law enforcement, for two decades.
That's my take. In my view, and from what I have experienced, having brothers in both law enforcement, AND behind bars, these pedophiles, are masterminds at what they do. They'll be the first to tell you that.
I don't think ANYONE "Knew" jack shit, outside of the children he preyed on, and the handful of powerless counselors who at least attempted to report it.
But it's the narrative the you and your pals claim is believed by 95% of the nation, to which we must also conform. If you don't believe that, then you must believe that the janitors who allegedly witnessed Jerry abusing a kid in a hallway are guilty of failure to report, because their claims that they were afraid to say anything because of fear of reprisals from Joe Paterno are false.
Then you must ask why the supposed victims from 1971 and 1976 didn't report their abuse to anyone else after allegedly speaking to Paterno.
If that's the thought you go into it with, they do. Similarly, if you go into the whole Sandusky situation thinking he wasn't guilty you can find reason to believe that. I think both beliefs are offbase.
Last edited:
Paterno also stated he had no idea what really happened, not what he would call it. I hardly think that's backing up diddly-poop. Furthermore, two men that are alive that have testified recently stated that they did not think what happened was worthy of a call to police.
LMAO. Ok Mr. Freeh. You are making some MAJOR leaps based on the way you want to interpret something that is anything from clear. But hey, why even try to get a clear determination of stuff like that, it's much more fun to simply jump to conclusions.
And, Einstein, what are your thoughts on Second Mile not being investigated at all in this whole thing? You're ok with that huh? Yeah, you really care about protecting children alright.
You are the worst kind of moron. You are a moron that thinks you are smart.
Thank you for confirming how right she is. You know, since you are wrong about everything.
You trolls are pathetic human beings. Why is it exactly that you don't care about the victims, past or future? Is it about football? Is it because Joe's team beat your team?
From your posts, I don't believe you are a graduate of high school, let alone PSU.
Don't mistake influence for power. Joe had a ton of influence, not a ton of real power.
I said before that TSM should have been reamed out by an investigation a long time ago. Now who's taking leaps?
Seriously? What kind of power did he have outside of the football program? At one time I think he had power within the broader athletic department, but even that didn't seem to be the case towards the end. Anyone who followed things closely during his final five to ten years could see that he was increasingly marginalized
It's a separate argument and tangental at it's most serious. I was making a different point. Not into straying that far off today, whatever.
Well look at the power he has from the grave... getting numerous people to blindly defend him to the point where some are trying to "prove" that a serial pedophile is innocent. It's pretty crazy stuff.
That's the problem with this case is there's very little hard evidence and a lot of innuendo and speculation.
You'll have to explain; what Emails constituted hard evidence? Or gave a true and complete picture?
The Emails I have seen are inconclusive at best, more likely dubious or meaningless.
Give us your case, which you say consists of testimony and hard evidence. You're a skeptic with other points of view here, but you spend little time or effort actually making a point. And have you convinced anyone here?
I cannot speak for my "pals," but I do not say that. The old chestnut that "Joe ran everything," has not held up, even after (and, in part, because of) the Freeh Report.
1971 told his foster parents. We would need a lot more information about 1976 before reaching any conclusions.
It sure sounds like you want to blame Paterno, though.
Yet his call to Curley and Schultz triggered the call to Courtney. Paterno never knew the details and McQueary said he didn't tell him the details.
Joe knew, and Joe told. That is what he was suppose to do.
Yes, Mr. Freeh. Exactly. You are doing exactly what Freeh did, take one vague email and go way overboard trying to twist what it said to fit your needs. I know why a lot of other non-PSU people would want to do that, but why would you (lol a PSU alum) want to also do that without any basis in logic or reason? Because you are a complete moron, that's why. Your "arguments" are beyond weak. You are simply an argumentative person that gets into fights with people all the time, and at the same time you wonder why no one in your life seems to get along with you.
Hitting a little close to home am I? I have met people like you before. No one wants to be around you. Even your family.
proving what?
You need to be more specific if you have any hope of credibility here.
Let's hear it -- is this a mass conspiracy that happened to protect the football program? Is that what you are getting at?
Or JUST WHAT are you saying?
