ADVERTISEMENT

Just vsited The Lair

Thanks...let those losers post whatever they want about PSU over there, but why stoop to their level? As for the 2017 reference, when was the Rose Bowl? Even after that loss, it was obvious this program was about to be elite again. Sorry, but the "back" portion is right. We haven't been a regular top 10 program for a while. Things are looking good.
But the Big championship was in 2016 as were all the games we won. But nice try.
 
Not that I'm one to brag or anything..... but totally called this back in August

FACT!

August 11th to exact.
I brought it up sometime in August in response to a LionJim post. Then I backed off but kept an eye on him. He started loosening up, posting more frequently, being cocky, and recently using an absolute - "I can now confirm yada yada yada." That convinced me.

I am, however, happy to give you full credit for your call. They try to hide but style betrays them eventually. FACT!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21.Guns
Not that I'm one to brag or anything..... but totally called this back in August
FACT!
August 11th to exact.
Yup! Here it is...
He's been quite the Bisybee, but you'd have to ask Mike...
And here was my reply:
LOL, Gunsie...
Female-Bodybuilder.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 21.Guns
But the Big championship was in 2016 as were all the games we won. But nice try.
Try doing some research by checking all my posts. We talk about lazy media, which they are, but if you took any time to look at all my posts, it is pretty obvious. But if name calling is your thing, have it.
 
I brought it up sometime in August in response to a LionJim post. Then I backed off but kept an eye on him. He started loosening up, posting more frequently, being cocky, and recently using an absolute - "I can now confirm yada yada yada." That convinced me.

I am, however, happy to give you full credit for your call. They try to hide but style betrays them eventually. FACT!

Poor fella just can't help himself. Gotta give him credit for trying to change his style at least for a little bit, but like all his other names over the years he'll expose himself sooner or later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artsandletters
Thanks...let those losers post whatever they want about PSU over there, but why stoop to their level? As for the 2017 reference, when was the Rose Bowl? Even after that loss, it was obvious this program was about to be elite again. Sorry, but the "back" portion is right. We haven't been a regular top 10 program for a while. Things are looking good.
I wouldn't have had the interest or taken the time but several good posters weighed in. So I wanted to know what's up.
And the loss in the Rose Bowl, as the game played out and with the background of the several years before it, really left me feeling like it was more a loss of the last 5 minutes of that game. There was so much of that experience to feel great about. In fact, I don't think I've ever felt as good about after a loss.
 
Thanks...let those losers post whatever they want about PSU over there, but why stoop to their level? As for the 2017 reference, when was the Rose Bowl? Even after that loss, it was obvious this program was about to be elite again. Sorry, but the "back" portion is right. We haven't been a regular top 10 program for a while. Things are looking good.

So in 2016 after an 11-2 regular season and a rose bowl loss to USC (and a 3-0 start to 2017)... PSU is now a "regular" top 10 program?

But in 2008 after an 11-1 regular season and a rose bowl loss to USC (and a 3-0 start to 2009)... PSU wasn't "back" as a regular top 10 program?
 
So in 2016 after an 11-2 regular season and a rose bowl loss to USC (and a 3-0 start to 2017)... PSU is now a "regular" top 10 program?

But in 2008 after an 11-1 regular season and a rose bowl loss to USC (and a 3-0 start to 2009)... PSU wasn't "back" as a regular top 10 program?
Seriously? One top 10 and a 3-0 start is not regular top 10. This group has a chance to make this a regular occurrence. Seriously though, are you really analyzing my handle? Check my prior posts
 
Seriously? One top 10 and a 3-0 start is not regular top 10. This group has a chance to make this a regular occurrence.

Thanks Captain Obvious. That was the entire point of my post. I damn near posted the definition of the word "regular". So now that we have that out of the way, I see you are backpedaling from:

PSUisBack2017 said:
Sorry, but the "back" portion is right. We haven't been a regular top 10 program for a while.

to

PSUisBack2017 said:
This group has a chance to make this a regular occurrence.

So since PSU only has a chance to be a regular top ten team, does that mean they are not "back"? If they are "back".. how is that any different than 2008/2009? Asking for a friend.
 
Thanks Captain Obvious. That was the entire point of my post. I damn near posted the definition of the word "regular". So now that we have that out of the way, I see you are backpedaling from:



to



So since PSU only has a chance to be a regular top ten team, does that mean they are not "back"? If they are "back".. how is that any different than 2008/2009? Asking for a friend.

He's got a long way to go before he gets to "Joedidntknow" Jedi troll level. Something tells me this isn't going to be a very long con.
 
Thanks Captain Obvious. That was the entire point of my post. I damn near posted the definition of the word "regular". So now that we have that out of the way, I see you are backpedaling from:



to



So since PSU only has a chance to be a regular top ten team, does that mean they are not "back"? If they are "back".. how is that any different than 2008/2009? Asking for a friend.

The more I think of it, I don't have to prove anything to you. If it isn't obvious that PSU has the chance to be very relevant over the next 5-10 years...hence the "back" comment. Again, check all my prior posts...you won't do that because you are probably the same as the lazy media we all gripe about. Oh and you'd have to admit your wrong.
 
The more I think of it, I don't have to prove anything to you. If it isn't obvious that PSU has the chance to be very relevant over the next 5-10 years...hence the "back" comment. Again, check all my prior posts...you won't do that because you are probably the same as the lazy media we all gripe about. Oh and you'd have to admit your wrong.
Well, you don't have very many posts to check.
 
Well, you don't have very many posts to check.
I have enough to show I joined after the BIG Championship and right before the Rose Bowl.

The funny thing is, I got torn up because I don't get why anyone cares about Pitt anymore. The game is over and they are irrelevant. True fans know, just like the team and coaches know, the next bog step is Iowa.
 
I have enough to show I joined after the BIG Championship and right before the Rose Bowl.

The funny thing is, I got torn up because I don't get why anyone cares about Pitt anymore. The game is over and they are irrelevant. True fans know, just like the team and coaches know, the next bog step is Iowa.
They're the other main state school, we recruit against them, we play them for two more years, their looking bad helps us in future recruiting, etc etc etc.
 
They're the other main state school, we recruit against them, we play them for two more years, their looking bad helps us in future recruiting, etc etc etc.

Yea, except PSU is on a different level. Our recruiting hasn't really "competed" against Pitt for a while. I saw the numbers posted a while back, but head-to-head we crush them.

I guess I don't get all the posts about what they are talking about. Who cares? They are 1-2 and on their way to a looooong season.
 
Yea, except PSU is on a different level. Our recruiting hasn't really "competed" against Pitt for a while. I saw the numbers posted a while back, but head-to-head we crush them.

I guess I don't get all the posts about what they are talking about. Who cares? They are 1-2 and on their way to a looooong season.
They don't get a lot away from PSU, but they do get some. The goal is to get that to the point where they don't get any that PSU wants....that's why pointing out their weaknesses is a good thing.
 
They don't get a lot away from PSU, but they do get some. The goal is to get that to the point where they don't get any that PSU wants....that's why pointing out their weaknesses is a good thing.
I can see that. I guess my feeling is by even acknowledging them we are giving them some "value" that they don't really have.
 
The more I think of it, I don't have to prove anything to you. If it isn't obvious that PSU has the chance to be very relevant over the next 5-10 years...hence the "back" comment. Again, check all my prior posts...you won't do that because you are probably the same as the lazy media we all gripe about. Oh and you'd have to admit your wrong.

Yeah, that wasn't predictable. You get called out and instead of answering a tough question, "your" just deflecting.... weak! I don't care about your prior posts, I'm asking you about your posts in this thread. They are your words, you should defend them or admit what you said makes no sense.

I realize it's just an attempt to change the subject, but all I've done is ask you questions, what could I possibly be wrong about?
 
He's got a long way to go before he gets to "Joedidntknow" Jedi troll level. Something tells me this isn't going to be a very long con.

Notice the overuse of "we" or "us", a common troll mistake? Also... what's with the odd fixation on the "lazy media"?

Can't wait to the big unmasking where he/she reveals that they were actually a troll the entire time... and they would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you pesky kids and dog.
 
Yeah, that wasn't predictable. You get called out and instead of answering a tough question, "your" just deflecting.... weak! I don't care about your prior posts, I'm asking you about your posts in this thread. They are your words, you should defend them or admit what you said makes no sense.

I realize it's just an attempt to change the subject, but all I've done is ask you questions, what could I possibly be wrong about?

Ok, tell me how I prove my fandom to you? Premise behind PSUisBack 2017 is I truly feel from 2017 and on this program will be top 10. It's been a while since we could feel we would have a chance to maintain that status. Also, if you look at when I joined, it was 3 days before 2017....
 
Ok, tell me how I prove my fandom to you? Premise behind PSUisBack 2017 is I truly feel from 2017 and on this program will be top 10. It's been a while since we could feel we would have a chance to maintain that status. Also, if you look at when I joined, it was 3 days before 2017....

I've heard your alleged backstory before, please stop with the repetitive distraction. I'm not asking you to prove your fandom, I'm asking you to prove your logic, the same thing I've been asking in every post:

So since PSU only has a chance to be a regular top ten team, does that mean they are not "back"? If they are "back".. how is that any different than 2008/2009? Asking for a friend.

I'm also curious as to what I could be wrong about since I've only been asking you questions?

Oh and you'd have to admit your wrong.
 
Not sure how to prove me fandom, nor do I need to. Funny thing is I attended two PSU games this year and the one I didn't attend was Pitt.

I understand talking crap when we play them, but the game is over. PSU won and has much bigger and tougher games coming up. Just because I think it is weird that anyone still is talking about Pitt doesn't make me a Pitt fan or troll.

Didn't mean you- I was agreeing with you :)
 
Pitt could very well lose 7 games this season.

but they are winners because, time of possession

You might be right on with this statement. It was a pretty sad state of affairs this past weekend. I see VaTech,Miami,UNC as clear loses. NC.State as a toss up/leaning towards the NC.State side. UVA is much improved as is Duke. Cuse is just bad but then again last years shootout
 
Curious if there is a program that has fallen as far and as long as as Pittsburgh has? Thinking about 42-14 onward they've really sunk more than any program. ND? Tennessee? Syracuse was never top tier. Miami? Who else fits the bill?

The early and Mid 90's really killed us. Hackett and Majors two, along with the administration basically giving up on football didn't help. I have been a long time Pitt man, as well as a former player. I am just really starting to lose hope on the program. Saturday was bad
 
I've heard your alleged backstory before, please stop with the repetitive distraction. I'm not asking you to prove your fandom, I'm asking you to prove your logic, the same thing I've been asking in every post:



I'm also curious as to what I could be wrong about since I've only been asking you questions?
I've answered you Pandaczar...don't really care what that is your handle, but it's pretty pathetic that this consumes you. Just because I don't post every day about every topic doesn't make me less of a fan.
 
Was Lionrevival banned on BWI?
Yes but he's still going strong on the Lair....and the idiots on there think he's actually a PSU fan and the only reasonable one there is. He'll be back (and may already be) under a new name, but it's not as much fun for him when PSU is winning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: denniskembala
I've answered you Pandaczar...

And your answer was distraction. I'm not looking for that sort of answer. I want you to explain your logic. You've also not explained what I could be wrong about since I've only been asking you questions?

don't really care what that is your handle

Can you try again in English?????

but it's pretty pathetic that this consumes you. Just because I don't post every day about every topic doesn't make me less of a fan.

Not sure how it is pathetic or consuming to ask you a simple question. Now your avoidance of a simple question... that's pathetic and consuming.

Just because I don't post every day about every topic doesn't make me less of a fan.

What does this have to do with anything? Can't you read? I'm asking you to defend your logic, not your fandom.
 
And your answer was distraction. I'm not looking for that sort of answer. I want you to explain your logic. You've also not explained what I could be wrong about since I've only been asking you questions?



Can you try again in English?????



Not sure how it is pathetic or consuming to ask you a simple question. Now your avoidance of a simple question... that's pathetic and consuming.



What does this have to do with anything? Can't you read? I'm asking you to defend your logic, not your fandom.
Ok, so if I change it to 2016, all is good? Why do you even care? Hateto tell you this, number of posts doesn't make you a better fan...hate to burst your bubble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rlmpsucpa
Ok, so if I change it to 2016, all is good? Why do you even care? Hateto tell you this, number of posts doesn't make you a better fan...hate to burst your bubble.

So now you are saying they were "back" in 2016? Is that when it was obvious this program was about to be elite again, and they become a regular top 10 program? Were they also back in 2008?

Why this obsession with number of posts? You are the only one bringing that up.
 
Penn State never left. Sure, they weren't in the top ten for several years before last season, but given the horrific, unjust circumstances they were put through (that no other ever has), they did much more than merely survive. From 2012 to 2015, Penn State had a better record than a number of reputable programs. Penn State won a bowl game and played competitively in another bowl (against Georgia). Few, if any, programs could have done as well under the circumstances. Some likely would have shut down. All the while, recruiting improved year on year. All this with three coaching changes post-Joe (counting Bradley as one; I could also count LJ and make it four).

Going back a few more years, Penn State and Wisconsin are the only b1g schools with consecutive winning seasons since 2005. When you consider the sanctions that were intended to destroy the program, the fact that Joe was slowing down in his last 10 or so years, and that Penn State is still one of the few power programs to openly focus on academics and rules compliance, it's a wonder that they have been able to have such success.

Once and for all, everyone just stop with the "we are back" mantra. It's insulting.
 
So now you are saying they were "back" in 2016? Is that when it was obvious this program was about to be elite again, and they become a regular top 10 program? Were they also back in 2008?

Why this obsession with number of posts? You are the only one bringing that up.

Elite isn't a one year trend (2008)....seriously....elite programs that are regularly in in the top 10.....thinking Ohio State, Alabama, Oklahoma, and Clemson recently over the past few years.

I honestly feel PSU is BACK and turning into one of those types of programs. If you feel PSU has been to that regular level of relevance over the past 15 or so years, well then you don't really know college football. And before you go claiming I am insulting PSU, I am not. I truly believe they are here to stay for a while at this elite level.
 
Penn State never left. Sure, they weren't in the top ten for several years before last season, but given the horrific, unjust circumstances they were put through (that no other ever has), they did much more than merely survive. From 2012 to 2015, Penn State had a better record than a number of reputable programs. Penn State won a bowl game and played competitively in another bowl (against Georgia). Few, if any, programs could have done as well under the circumstances. Some likely would have shut down. All the while, recruiting improved year on year. All this with three coaching changes post-Joe (counting Bradley as one; I could also count LJ and make it four).

Going back a few more years, Penn State and Wisconsin are the only b1g schools with consecutive winning seasons since 2005. When you consider the sanctions that were intended to destroy the program, the fact that Joe was slowing down in his last 10 or so years, and that Penn State is still one of the few power programs to openly focus on academics and rules compliance, it's a wonder that they have been able to have such success.

Once and for all, everyone just stop with the "we are back" mantra. It's insulting.

I don't find it insulting because Penn State has been underperformed since we joined the Big 10. We have what, 4 conference titles in 25 years? That is not acceptable at Penn State nor is 8-4 or 7-5. A school with the football budget, facilities, alumni / fan base that we have should aspire to much more than that. We have really only had one great team since joining the conference (1994). 2005 was close but as much fun as that was, if we are honest with ourselves we were not on the level of USC or Texas that year. Franklin has brought something to the program that we have needed for almost two decades and it is so much fun to see it all play out in front of us. Enjoy the ride fellas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSUisBack2017
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT