ADVERTISEMENT

Lee/Bartlett

It was 10-8 beau. Nick walked him out and Beau let him. 1pt step out 1pt caution. That tied the score and on criteria, it went to the fact that Beau had a caution and he lost. horrible way to lose. The mat scorekeeper charged the caution to Nick, so it appeared that Beau won - incorrectly.
 
In all seriousness, I am seeing a lot of people say that the caution & one was unmerited. But I think it was completely merited, and an illustration of the new-this-year rule:
You can now get a takedown or a step out PLUS a caution and 1 point in the same sequence for fleeing the mat.

My biggest beef with officiating in both styles is that fleeing the mat isn’t called enough. This change, and how the US officials called it this week, is a great step in the right direction (no guarantee about the uww crew). Just need to call diving to your knees on the edge fleeing now too. If Beau had just dug an underhook and tried to circle in that sequence, he wins 10-9. Crappy way to lose, but generally better than the ice skating phase of any close match, IMO.
 
Last edited:
In all seriousness, I am seeing a lot of people say that the caution in one was unmerited. But I think it was completely merited, and an illustration of the new-this-year rule:


My biggest beef with officiating in both styles is that fleeing the mat isn’t called enough. This change, and how the US officials called it this week, is a great step in the right direction (no guarantee about the uww crew). Just need to call diving to your knees on the edge fleeing now too. If Beau had just dug an underhook and tried to circle in that sequence, he wins 10-9. Crappy way to lose, but generally better than the ice skating phase of any close match, IMO.
#CALLMOREFLEEING

*I haven't watched the match, yet... Just generally always in favor of a negative consequence for leaving the competitive surface.
 
I'm increasingly coming to learn that freestyle scoring is sort of like the "ranked choice voting" systems that people are pushing these days. If you can't explain, simply and precisely, what it takes to win, and it's going to take days to figure it out, maybe it's not that great to begin with.
 
I'm increasingly coming to learn that freestyle scoring is sort of like the "ranked choice voting" systems that people are pushing these days. If you can't explain, simply and precisely, what it takes to win, and it's going to take days to figure it out, maybe it's not that great to begin with.
It is a new rule, but I think the rules are pretty straightforward. More so than the new loophole in rideout criterea w/ UTB, anyway, and probably more straightforward than the proposed riding time change. Somebody made an error at the scorer's table. That definitely never happens in folkstyle, right? :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: hlstone and Fatmarc
In all seriousness, I am seeing a lot of people say that the caution & one was unmerited. But I think it was completely merited, and an illustration of the new-this-year rule:


My biggest beef with officiating in both styles is that fleeing the mat isn’t called enough. This change, and how the US officials called it this week, is a great step in the right direction (no guarantee about the uww crew). Just need to call diving to your knees on the edge fleeing now too. If Beau had just dug an underhook and tried to circle in that sequence, he wins 10-9. Crappy way to lose, but generally better than the ice skating phase of any close match, IMO.
I didn’t see the match. That said, my question concerns the spirit vs the letter of the law. Perhaps the ruling was technically correct, but do you honestly believe Beau was “fleeing the mat” in that instance?
 
I didn’t see the match. That said, my question concerns the spirit vs the letter of the law. Perhaps the ruling was technically correct, but do you honestly believe Beau was “fleeing the mat” in that instance?
Yes. If he’d been aware of the situation, there are many things he could have done to win the match.
 
I didn’t see the match. That said, my question concerns the spirit vs the letter of the law. Perhaps the ruling was technically correct, but do you honestly believe Beau was “fleeing the mat” in that instance?
Watched the match and he wasnt exactly “on his bike” (like he should have been) I dont think he intentionally left the mat.

Is it a caution and one if you were too start sprinting in a circle? Wouldnt this be more of a clock killer than intentionally stepping out, which KILLS the clock?


Edit.. judging by the way lee was acting as the clock wore down, he assumed he had lost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob_Anderson
Yes. If he’d been aware of the situation, there are many things he could have done to win the match.
Actually, that wasn’t what I asked. Surely, Beau could have been smarter about the rules in that situation. My question is do you think it was Beau’s intent to “flee the mat”, which the rule is in place to deter?
 
Is it a caution and one if you were too start sprinting in a circle? Wouldnt this be more of a clock killer than intentionally stepping out, which KILLS the clock?
I think they call that fleeing the hold, and it's also a Caution & 1.

I will say--whenever new rules come out, it seems like USA Wrestling refs usually actually embrace them, and try to incorporate them as best they can into their calling of matches, whereas, UWW refs take a much more liberal "spirit of the rule" type of interpretation.

In Vegas, it looks like the refs conferred after every step out "Is it also fleeing?" and if a majority was yes, they'd issue the caution. AB (or should we call him American Yazdani?) cautioned a dude out yesterday doing just that.

Anyway, here's the exchange:
giphy.gif


@NittanyChris I think Beau was trying to secure the win by not engaging in wrestling, and backed straight off the mat with little effort to stay in bounds and/or engage. I know we see it ALL THE TIME in sub-20 second close match situations, which is why I think they added the rule this year. It's not the way I wanted that match to end at all, but I think it was the correct call.

I do have my doubts about the "grounded" call when Beau looked to score his own step out point on the immediately preceding exchange, though. Nick was grounded in the circle, and then he got up as he went out.

For me, the bottom line of this match was how good it was! These dudes went at it, and Beau is clearly at a new level with his confidence. Medals for them all in the future!
 
Last edited:
Watched the match and he wasnt exactly “on his bike” (like he should have been) I dont think he intentionally left the mat.

Is it a caution and one if you were too start sprinting in a circle? Wouldnt this be more of a clock killer than intentionally stepping out, which KILLS the clock?


Edit.. judging by the way lee was acting as the clock wore down, he assumed he had lost.
It was a pretty sad way to lose that match. Didn’t like the referee’s call there. Has to be a heartbreaker for the kid. I was actually rooting for a criteria win for Nick, just because he is all-in on freestyle at this point, and Beau would get a huge shot of confidence going into next folkstyle season. That’s a really tough way to lose, though. I hope Beau and Nick are cool with each other and will help each other become the best wrestlers they can going forward.
 
I think they call that fleeing the hold, and it's also a Caution & 1.

I will say--whenever new rules come out, it seems like USA Wrestling refs usually actually embrace them, and try to incorporate them as best they can into their calling of matches, whereas, UWW refs take a much more liberal "spirit of the rule" type of interpretation.

In Vegas, it looks like the refs conferred after every step out "Is it also fleeing?" and if a majority was yes, they'd issue the caution. AB (or should we call him American Yazdani?) cautioned a dude out yesterday doing just that.

Anyway, here's the exchange:
giphy.gif


@NittanyChris I think Beau was trying to secure the win by not engaging in wrestling, and backed straight off the mat with little effort to stay in bounds and/or engage. I know we see it ALL THE TIME in sub-20 second close match situations, which is why I think they added the rule this year. It's not the way I wanted that match to end at all, but I think it was the correct call.

I do have my doubts about the "grounded" call when Beau looked to score his own step out point on the immediately preceding exchange, though. Nick was grounded in the circle, and then he got up as he went out.

For me, the bottom line of this match was how good it was! These dudes went at it, and Beau is clearly at a new level with his confidence. Medals for them all in the future!
Wasnt Beau our U23 rep last year, I fully expect him too take that title this year.
 
Actually, that wasn’t what I asked. Surely, Beau could have been smarter about the rules in that situation. My question is do you think it was Beau’s intent to “flee the mat”, which the rule is in place to deter?
100% he was fleeing the mat. I understand that is fairly common in wrestling in the last few seconds of a close match but he took like 7-8 steps straight backwards and out of bounds. If he circles at all he wins the match. I hate him losing like that but it was the correct call
 
I'm increasingly coming to learn that freestyle scoring is sort of like the "ranked choice voting" systems that people are pushing these days. If you can't explain, simply and precisely, what it takes to win, and it's going to take days to figure it out, maybe it's not that great to begin with.
My wife is a wrestling fan but doesn’t know a lot about it.
1) she was noticing how much more action the US Open had, compared to the NCAAs last month. It is a lot more exciting. She thought the wrestlers trying to score a point with riding time was a factor in making the NCAAs dull sometimes.
2) admittedly the scoring is confusing. How does criteria work? Why do some exposures score points and others don’t? Why did one wrestler go on the clock? The announcers did a pretty good job trying to explain but it’s hard for fans to understand, any simplification is great.

Hated to see Beau lose that way! Seems he didn’t fully understand the risks of backing off the mat without more of a struggle, either.
 
BB looked great. Nick did not. Beau was the better wrestler in this match. Hope Nick takes advantage of the solid done him on this one.
I disagree. Nick shut it down too early but looked good up to that point. Lesson for both!
 
I'm glad it was against Nick because I would be fuming (and still kind of am because I feel Beau earned it) against any other wrestler. Referee inserted himself way too much by hitting that C1 as @CSauertiegPSU mentioned and Beau clearly still thought he was okay since they messed up criteria (showing he had it) and wrestled accordingly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldenanimal
I'm glad it was against Nick because I would be fuming (and still kind of am because I feel Beau earned it) against any other wrestler. Referee inserted himself way too much by hitting that C1 as @CSauertiegPSU mentioned and Beau clearly still thought he was okay since they messed up criteria (showing he had it) and wrestled accordingly.
Just to clarify, it was at least 2 of the 3 officials that made the call, not just the referee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoosier Lion
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT