ADVERTISEMENT

Lubrano spoke at tonight's PSU Lake Erie Honor Joe Event

Hey, if you want to cop to being a pedophile enabler and someone who knew with certainty that Sandusky was fellating and sodomizing young boys for years and did nothing about it for the sake of football, go ahead and be my guest. I'm not. Anyone with an ounce of common sense would reject that idea in its entirety.


I'll go with Louie Freeh's take on things considering he had millions of documents, 300+ interviews, and grand jury testimony to base his conclusions. Testimony BTW that led to the criminal indictments of senior administrators for child endangerment that still stands today. What do you stand on? Blind faith, hope, and fingers crossed? Well that doesn't cut it for me.
 
I'll go with Louie Freeh's take on things considering he had millions of documents, 300+ interviews, and grand jury testimony to base his conclusions. Testimony BTW that led to the criminal indictments of senior administrators for child endangerment that still stands today. What do you stand on? Blind faith, hope, and fingers crossed? Well that doesn't cut it for me.
Good God, you actually believe your own bullshit. 300 plus interviews? Really. Everyone knows that's bs. Millions of documents? All reviewed, right? Wrong. It was physically impossible to do it in the time they had. Keep doubling down on your own ignorance. OGBOT PLANT!
 
  • Like
Reactions: biacto
I'll go with Louie Freeh's take on things considering he had millions of documents, 300+ interviews, and grand jury testimony to base his conclusions. Testimony BTW that led to the criminal indictments of senior administrators for child endangerment that still stands today. What do you stand on? Blind faith, hope, and fingers crossed? Well that doesn't cut it for me.

I stand on common sense. Do you have any?

You really think "everyone" knew that Sandusky was fellating and sodomizing kids and stood idly by in the name of football? "Everyone" isn't one or two individuals trying to hide something either.

Mistakes were made. No doubt. Those mistakes do not equate to standing by while knowingly allowing a pedophile to roam free sodomizing and fellating young boys (in the name of football).

Your trust in the Freeh report is your fatal flaw. May as well call it the Vicky report...... Only a total fool would believe that preconceived piece of shit....... Be that as it may. You are what you are.
 
I stand on common sense. Do you have any?

You really think "everyone" knew that Sandusky was fellating and sodomizing kids and stood idly by in the name of football? "Everyone" isn't one or two individuals trying to hide something either.

Mistakes were made. No doubt. Those mistakes do not equate to standing by while knowingly allowing a pedophile to roam free sodomizing and fellating young boys (in the name of football).

Your trust in the Freeh report is your fatal flaw. May as well call it the Vicky report...... Only a total fool would believe that preconceived piece of shit....... Be that as it may. You are what you are.

Well, I've come to believe Ira, Silvis, Suhey, Joyner, Garban, and Surma knew about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biacto
I'll go with Louie Freeh's take on things considering he had millions of documents, 300+ interviews, and grand jury testimony to base his conclusions. Testimony BTW that led to the criminal indictments of senior administrators for child endangerment that still stands today. What do you stand on? Blind faith, hope, and fingers crossed? Well that doesn't cut it for me.

Psst, they were charged before Louis was ever hired. That's not even taking into account the charges were thrown out for being utterly bogus and unsubstantiated. Other than that, you make a great punching bag for LA.
 
mvrcwl.jpg
 
My WINNING this battle for 5 years qualifies me. Watching and hearing people do the same thing over and over again for 5 years and ending up with defeat after defeat............and you think these people are competent and their behavior rational? Consider my advice as a message from God to those who have lost their way and are in need of an intervention so they can move on to more noble and winnable pursuits It's the Christian thing to do and God wants to reward them with victories, not more defeats. Are you saying I shouldn't do the Christian thing and do what he has asked me to do?
You live in a common shit hole in Jersey. STFU.
 
Psst, they were charged before Louis was ever hired. That's not even taking into account the charges were thrown out for being utterly bogus and unsubstantiated. Other than that, you make a great punching bag for LA.

would you kindly link the LA Lion reference?
 
You winning? What an arrogant jackass. What have you won? A car for one thing? My wife's hand in marriage for another. That you bury your head and are a coward? If I were a coward I wouldn't posting what I believe is the truth in this forum. How many times have you been proven wrong. Not many. What a joke. And you try to gloat. LMMFAO! Not gloating at all but tempted. Sitting here quietly with a Cheshire Cat grin secure in the knowledge that the the university is on the right track and prospering because of the courageous decisions made by the Board on/around and after November 9th, 2011. Also watching with amusement the Joebots turning on the PS4RS board members and fighting amongst themselves just as I predicted quite some time ago. The fact that we simply have a football team proves you and Corrupt Rodney wrong. The fact that our gpa's and grad rates are great and rising proves you wrong. The fact that nothing has gotten better for children in PA proves you wrong. Sanctions removed, wins restored proves you wrong. I think you have it backwards. All those things you just stated except for maybe the children proves Rod and the Board right. Now go away. Must I? LOL!
 
The mere fact that you support Rodney proves how little integrity you have. None. So you support the actions of a man that did not have authority to do what he did. You're beyond pathetic. What he did is absolutely against board and legal protocol of Penn State. No one has authority to spend 60 million dollars without board approval. You are wrong, again.
 

Man is that funny...... Zippy is acting if things weren't going to improve from the low point... crediting it to the morons on the BOT instead of time... You are a classic imbecile. I wish AL were posting to keep your silliness in check....
 
  • Like
Reactions: biacto
I'll go with Louie Freeh's take on things considering he had millions of documents, 300+ interviews, and grand jury testimony to base his conclusions. Testimony BTW that led to the criminal indictments of senior administrators for child endangerment that still stands today. What do you stand on? Blind faith, hope, and fingers crossed? Well that doesn't cut it for me.
So cruising let me ask you this. Will your position change if the remaining charges are dropped? If you are standing on the record, and the record Ganges to show that these administrators were not guilty of what they for indicted for, will that change your point of view? Or, will your point of view remain as it is without flexibility in response to the official record?
 
Take up a different cause where you can make a difference? Perhaps you should take your own advice, Mr. Connected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simons96
So cruising let me ask you this. Will your position change if the remaining charges are dropped? If you are standing on the record, and the record Ganges to show that these administrators were not guilty of what they for indicted for, will that change your point of view? Or, will your point of view remain as it is without flexibility in response to the official record?
Doubtful he'll change his tune. He'll say they admitted their guilt to Baldwin but were let off because her testimony was tossed.
 
Doubtful he'll change his tune. He'll say they admitted their guilt to Baldwin but were let off because her testimony was tossed.
He put it out there. I just want to know if he will be consistent with his beliefs relying upon the record or if he will change when it doesn't fit a certain narrative.
 
So we have a 4-5 year fight with these powerful people to prove the Freeh Report is not reliable, and now you say even if they agree it won't be good enough. Sure. That's reasonable .
Dem,
Nice to see you chiming in. I am not fond of SSS and his tirades but surely you must understand the frustration many folks [myself included] feel toward the A-9.
 
Good God, you actually believe your own bullshit. 300 plus interviews? Really. Everyone knows that's bs. Millions of documents? All reviewed, right? Wrong. It was physically impossible to do it in the time they had. Keep doubling down on your own ignorance. OGBOT PLANT!


He says these things just to get a rise out of people.

He based his opinion on Freeh which built its house on a foundation of sand that has been steadily crumbling since 2011.

Barron has already said he doesn't buy Freeh. Hell, Freeh himself folded when challenged in court. His "conclusions" suddenly went from 'evidence based factual conclusions' to.....well.....more like his personal "opinions". Scientific 'fact' suddenly got reduced to just a personal 'theory'.

The foundation has shifted and it's close to collapse...... but 66 will swear to you his house is rock solid and you should buy it (even as the second floor has already imploded with only the first floor still standing). ;)

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
My WINNING this battle for 5 years qualifies me. Watching and hearing people do the same thing over and over again for 5 years and ending up with defeat after defeat............and you think these people are competent and their behavior rational? Consider my advice as a message from God to those who have lost their way and are in need of an intervention so they can move on to more noble and winnable pursuits It's the Christian thing to do and God wants to reward them with victories, not more defeats. Are you saying I shouldn't do the Christian thing and do what he has asked me to do?
Do they grow them all as stupid as you up in Kingston? You better drop your version of the prosperity gospel here, because I'm warning you right now, it will come back to bite you in the ass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simons96 and biacto
I'll go with Louie Freeh's take on things considering he had millions of documents, 300+ interviews, and grand jury testimony to base his conclusions. Testimony BTW that led to the criminal indictments of senior administrators for child endangerment that still stands today. What do you stand on? Blind faith, hope, and fingers crossed? Well that doesn't cut it for me.

I bet that you still think that Richard Jewell bombed the Atlanta Olympics based on Freeh's say-so.
 
Said the ANONYMOUS poster guy on a message board.

Christ - Put your NAME to your outrage. ORGANIZE something. Speak IN PERSON. SPEAK to IRA yourself - if I can do it, you can too.

Wake the hell up and get your priorities straight. This barking at others while you sit on the front porch does what, exactly?

Thank you for putting your name to everything you have done. You have actually been basically a star when the school needs one the most. It deserves appreciation because you kick ass.
 
So we have a 4-5 year fight with these powerful people to prove the Freeh Report is not reliable, and now you say even if they agree it won't be good enough. Sure. That's reasonable .

I think he's saying the public (outside State College) won't give a rat's ass if you discredit Freeh because the media spiked the ball on the 4th quarter go-ahead TD in July & as far as most are concerned the game is over. The only way you can get the ball back & score is to prove to the world those 1970s "victims" are lying. You think Ira will back you on that? Good luck. Ira is a snake. You try to negotiate with a snake you'll inevitably get bitten. I am very thankful for all you & Anthony & the other A9 have done but we have every right to be POed about that vote. It's negotiating with snakes.
 
Last edited:
I think he's saying the public (outside State College) won't give a rat's ass if you discredit Freeh because the media spiked the ball on the 4th quarter go-ahead TD in July & as far as most are concerned the game is over. The only way you can get the ball back & score is to prove to the world those 1970s "victims" are lying. You think Ira will back you on that? Good luck. Ira is a snake. You try to negotiate with a snake you'll inevitably get bitten. I am very thankful for all you & Anthony & the other A9 have done but we have every right to be POed about that vote. It's negotiating with snakes.
FWIW:

The "media" didn't "spike the ball"......the A9 did. The media (whom we all like to blame) has had nothing to do with the A9's fiduciary failures (highlighted by the most recent actions of the July coronations)


The A9 has - repeatedly - "spiked the ball" on their ability to ever claim to be the righteous stewards of the University. EVER. (The actions of July were just the coup de grace.)

As such, nothing they say or claim will ever carry the weight that might be ascribed to the righteous. EVER

Those are our proxies we are talking about


Now, clearly, the only way for our voices to be equated with the voices of the righteous - something that is a prerequisite if we are ever to actually WIN the battles we are engaged in - is to (at the least) place new individuals into those seats.........and, even then, removing the tar of fiduciary failure from those seats, and attaching a meaningful sense of righteousness to our voices - even with new personnel - will be a daunting task. A task much MORE difficult than the task we faced 5 years ago


As just ONE example, and this is a relatively minor issue:

If tomorrow, the voices of the A9 - joined by a chorus of all 27 other members of the BOT - proclaimed, in a united cacophony, "THE FREEH REPORT IS CRAP"!!!
Who would care?
Who should care?
No one would, ......aside from a small handful of folks who have known that all along .......and no one should
And then those same folks can raise a hew and cry that the PUBLIC and the MEDIA just won't "get it"


Thanks guys. :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: biacto
I think he's saying the public (outside State College) won't give a rat's ass if you discredit Freeh because the media spiked the ball on the 4th quarter go-ahead TD in July & as far as most are concerned the game is over. The only way you can get the ball back & score is to prove to the world those 1970s "victims" are lying. You think Ira will back you on that? Good luck. Ira is a snake. You try to negotiate with a snake you'll inevitably get bitten. I am very thankful for all you & Anthony & the other A9 have done but we have every right to be POed about that vote. It's negotiating with snakes.
Well, if the ship sailed for the public, then it sailed. But the truth of the matter is still a valuable thing. I agree that if you wish to change the view of the public at large you have a pretty tough time of it, and since July of 12 that has been the case.

I want a hundred thousand people in that stadium to know, when they talk to their friends who have been giving them the business for 4-5 years, that there IS another side to this and they WERE RIGHT to have sustained the faith for so long.

Our elected trustees want the same thing. If some folks like Barry want to declare defeat, that's fine. I did not form my views of this by consulting him, and I won't change my views of it just because he has panicked.
 
Well, if the ship sailed for the public, then it sailed. But the truth of the matter is still a valuable thing. I agree that if you wish to change the view of the public at large you have a pretty tough time of it, and since July of 12 that has been the case.

I want a hundred thousand people in that stadium to know, when they talk to their friends who have been giving them the business for 4-5 years, that there IS another side to this and they WERE RIGHT to have sustained the faith for so long.

Our elected trustees want the same thing. If some folks like Barry want to declare defeat, that's fine. I did not form my views of this by consulting him, and I won't change my views of it just because he has panicked.
LOL

Awfully weak attempt at deflection.......but if you are trying to defend the actions of the A9, what else have you got?

You may think pounding your chest with some "friends" over a ballgame or a tailgate carries more meaning than actually ....... you know ........ providing righteous, accountable, stakeholder-driven governance (though I STILL don't think that you really believe a lot of what you have written, for several reasons I still want to give you that much credit)

I am the one who is NOT willing to surrender or - in your words - "declare defeat", in THAT effort....... despite the fact that the A9 have done so.


But, we - You and I - are obviously talking about different battles......
I never placed the highest priority on the battle you have now, for some reason, decided to sell your soul for.........
And you have - apparently - decided that the battle that you previously claimed to hold dear is a "fungible" goal that can be used as a bargaining chip to secure some other objective

We each ought to have the freedom to choose which hill we are going to fight for.....no doubt

Good luck in your efforts - - I do only wish those efforts didn't have such a negative impact on the battle that I feel is of paramount importance (the effort to establish accountable governance for the University), but it is what it is.
 
LOL

Awfully weak attempt at deflection.......but if you are trying to defend the actions of the A9, what else have you got?

You may think pounding your chest with some "friends" over a ballgame or a tailgate carries more meaning than actually ....... you know ........ providing righteous, accountable, stakeholder-driven governance (though I STILL don't think that you really believe a lot of what you have written, for several reasons I still want to give you that much credit)

I am the one who is NOT willing to surrender or - in your words - "declare defeat", in THAT effort....... despite the fact that the A9 have done so.


But, we - You and I - are obviously talking about different battles......
I never placed the highest priority on the battle you have now, for some reason, decided to sell your soul for.........
And you have - apparently - decided that the battle that you previously claimed to hold dear is a "fungible" goal that can be used as a bargaining chip to secure some other objective

We each ought to have the freedom to choose which hill we are going to fight for.....no doubt

Good luck in your efforts - - I do only wish those efforts didn't have such a negative impact on the battle that I feel is of paramount importance (the effort to establish accountable governance for the University), but it is what it is.

My efforts have always been chosen by me. I don't panic.
 
My efforts have always been chosen by me. I don't panic.
Why do you always argue this from a false premise?

[obviously - I think :) - a rhetorical question. What other options do you have?]

Good luck......but I gave up wallowing in the GTASCA-style nonsense with that group long ago - - - and I'm not going to engage with you in that type of "debate" (LOL, that's the nice word.....but we all know what it really is)

I have too much respect for what you have done - - - and I think I would rather just keep it that way
 
Why do you always argue this from a false premise?

[obviously - I think - rhetorical.......what choice do you have?]

Good luck......but I gave up wallowing in the GTASCA-style nonsense with that group long ago - - - and I'm not going to engage with you in that type of "debate" (LOL, that's the nice word.....but we all know what it really is)

I have too much respect for what you have done - - - and I think I would rather just keep it that way
I'll do the same things no matter what you do. So will the others you've criticized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psuted
My efforts have always been chosen by me. I don't panic.

I don't really care about the haters because they'll hate no matter what.

However, the more ammunition you have to discredit the haters and people on the fense, the better. Until, I hear some compelling information to the contrary, I'll never give up publically defending Joe and the FB program from false BS that's been thrown around now for 4 years.
 
I'll go with Louie Freeh's take on things considering he had millions of documents, 300+ interviews, and grand jury testimony to base his conclusions. Testimony BTW that led to the criminal indictments of senior administrators for child endangerment that still stands today. What do you stand on? Blind faith, hope, and fingers crossed? Well that doesn't cut it for me.

LMAO... Hey the liar is back.... Still waiting for the links to those documents you say are out there that Lubrano and Tom asked you for over 3 months ago now... Keep trolling and spreading lies as usual Zippy... FYI You should go to Wal Mart saw in the paper they are having end of season sales on window a/c units you can stuff in your 1,000 sq. ft. pad...

window_ac_thumb_200x260.jpg
 
Good Morning Dem,

If the A9 (& BOT at large) are going to repudiate the Freeh Report, I sure hope they are going to explain why, why now instead of 4 years ago. and what this means for PSU moving forward.

You may recall that the A9 had to actually sue the university, who had been illegally denying them access to the Freeh materials, in order to conduct their analysis. Unfortunately the wheels of justice grind slowly.
 
Good Morning Dem,

If the A9 (& BOT at large) are going to repudiate the Freeh Report, I sure hope they are going to explain why, why now instead of 4 years ago. and what this means for PSU moving forward.

My sincere wish if this happens that it is simply an interim step in addressing the culpability of those in charge as well as the inherent governance flaws of our university.
Bingo!

Unfortunately, the existing A9 have forfeited that right (at least the right to make those arguments without inducing "chuckles").
Perhaps - and this is my hope, because I am NOT willing to concede - others will be able to take up that fight.
 
CR66 does? What boards, Zeno?
I've had the pleasure of chatting with John (under various aliases) in comment sections of various articles related to Paterno. He's also been known to bash Paterno -- as well as child abuse advocates (let that one sink in a moment) who don't support the "Penn State scandal" narrative -- using various Twitter 'parody' accounts.

John is a willing participant in an activity that is commonly known as astroturfing, the primary goal of which is (or appears to be) the smearing of Joe Paterno's name.
 
I've had the pleasure of chatting with John (under various aliases) in comment sections of various articles related to Paterno. He's also been known to bash Paterno -- as well as child abuse advocates (let that one sink in a moment) who don't support the "Penn State scandal" narrative -- using various Twitter 'parody' accounts.

John is a willing participant in an activity that is commonly known as astroturfing, the primary goal of which is (or appears to be) the smearing of Joe Paterno's name.

Oh boy you did it now... countdown until zippy chimes in with he is going to sue you and tom for using his name LOL.... 3-2-1...
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT