ADVERTISEMENT

More Trouble Brewing in Ann Arbor?

A lot of meaningless words here. It doesn’t matter if there was impact if you have an ounce of integrity. Either they broke rules or they didn’t. I always let things play out before forming an opinion. What happens after potentially being caught is meaningless on the act itself. I
That is my point. There are a lot allegations being made by anonymous sources. Until some of this becomes actual fact, example an AD or coach stating that they have made a request for the Big10 to intervene, I don't believe it.
 
Wrong, it is a rules violation for CMU to assist in another team's advance scouting scheme - you keep saying that is not so, but you're absolutely wrong. CMU knew scUM was playing MSU in several weeks. CMU knew exactly who Stalions was and that it was not legal for him to be there on their sidelines for an opponent scUM was playing in several weeks. CMU is absolutely complicit in the NCAA Rules Violation (especially given that their is footage throughout the game of Stalions communicating with the CMU Staff. Absolutely a Rules Violation for CMU to provide access to their Team Sideline via a Sideline pass when they know exactly who he is and that scUM is playing their Opponent, MSU, in a couple weeks down the road. You saying it's okay, doesn't make it so.
I mentioned earlier in the thread that the speculation is Stalions was there not to steal signs for Michigan but to steal signs for CMU. The logic goes CMU does not have budget for a sign stealing analyst. Ergo, they bring in Stalions for a game. What are the odds that any of the MSU's signs are going to be relevant in what is a scrimmage game? I did not see a camera out.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
I mentioned earlier in the thread that the speculation is Stalions was there not to steal signs for Michigan but to steal signs for CMU. The logic goes CMU does not have budget for a sign stealing analyst. Ergo, they bring in Stalions for a game. What are the odds that any of the MSU's signs are going to be relevant in what is a scrimmage game? I did not see a camera out.
What an interesting theory. Fantastic, in fact. Really explains why he had a blank sheet on his clip board instead of MSU’s signs. Explains why he was recording for later review. And really explains why he was hiding in the background talking to no one. So just how was he helping CMU?
 
No. All of those players also have to go through the combine. There is plenty of examples of great college football players who get drafted down appropriately. Aiden Hutchinson did not get drafted second because a sign stealer made him look good. Are the Detroit Lions cheating because suddenly a team that has lost for decades is suddenly winning? Is Hutchinson cheating at the Lions and that is the only reason for is outstanding PFF numbers. College is about talent. That is why Georgia, Alabama, and OSU are always in the mix. It is why the recruiting season is more important than the regular season. You don't have the players, you have a ceiling no matter how good your staff is.
You are ignorant if you don't think the NFL spends HOURS watching film of each draft prospect. All the film of Michigan players from the past 2.5 year is tainted.
 
You're literally pretending that so you can be mad when they don't because you're not stupid. You know it's highly unlikely.
I believe the odds are as follows:

10% Big Ten does nothing
50% Big Ten suspends Harbaugh and/or coordinators for remainder of season
40% Suspensions, fines and post-season ban.
 
I mentioned earlier in the thread that the speculation is Stalions was there not to steal signs for Michigan but to steal signs for CMU. The logic goes CMU does not have budget for a sign stealing analyst. Ergo, they bring in Stalions for a game. What are the odds that any of the MSU's signs are going to be relevant in what is a scrimmage game? I did not see a camera out.
I think its near impossible to steals signs in game real time and everything points to him stealing MSU signs to compare to the plays that were run to help UW when they played MSU later - the connections are all there - I wonder if the can get Stallions under oath to see how far this Michigan Man will go to cover for UM cheating.
 
What an interesting theory. Fantastic, in fact. Really explains why he had a blank sheet on his clip board instead of MSU’s signs. Explains why he was recording for later review. And really explains why he was hiding in the background talking to no one. So just how was he helping CMU?
yeah...the theory is total BS. I'll guarantee that the employment contract forbade them from working for or sharing information with any other organization. The guy wasn't a free agent consultant, he was an employee of UM. The very fact he was wearing CMU gear with the CMU team tells you all you need to know. Somebody was doing somebody a favor that was cheating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dailybuck777
You are ignorant if you don't think the NFL spends HOURS watching film of each draft prospect. All the film of Michigan players from the past 2.5 year is tainted.
Yeah, they always talk about how a player “has great instincts “ …. Which are always way better when you know the plays!

The almighty unmeasurables…..🤷🏿‍♂️….
 
You are ignorant if you don't think the NFL spends HOURS watching film of each draft prospect. All the film of Michigan players from the past 2.5 year is tainted.
The lions should rework Hutchinson contract then. His college film was tainted. They could maybe save some money
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bluehair666
I think its near impossible to steals signs in game real time and everything points to him stealing MSU signs to compare to the plays that were run to help UW when they played MSU later - the connections are all there - I wonder if the can get Stallions under oath to see how far this Michigan Man will go to cover for UM cheating.

That’s why I don’t think Michigan wants to or will sue the big ten or NCAA. The NCAA and Conference don’t have subpoena power and it’s not a crime to lie to them. Whole nother ball game once you take it to court. I don’t think even the UM fans drinking all the kool-aid would argue Stalions testifying in court would be good for the program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psu00
You don’t know nor do I. But they can easily suspend pending investigation
That is not how law works. What would happen if it turns out it was nothing? And who is they? The NCAA or the Big10? The NCAA has to do their investigation and than do the equivalent of a grand jury to ask is there enough. I have no problem with a suspension if a formal accusation has been made. The NCAA has to follow their guidelines which is 90 days. You are sounding like frontier or southern justice and want someone on the end of the noose.
 
That is my point. There are a lot allegations being made by anonymous sources. Until some of this becomes actual fact, example an AD or coach stating that they have made a request for the Big10 to intervene, I don't believe it.
I mentioned earlier in the thread that the speculation is Stalions was there not to steal signs for Michigan but to steal signs for CMU. The logic goes CMU does not have budget for a sign stealing analyst. Ergo, they bring in Stalions for a game. What are the odds that any of the MSU's signs are going to be relevant in what is a scrimmage game? I did not see a camera out.
Interesting observations and conclusions. Based on the latest comments by the Purdue coach, I’d appreciate your opinion as to whether The American Civil War, The Holocaust, and 9/11 actually happened.
 
That is not how law works. What would happen if it turns out it was nothing? And who is they? The NCAA or the Big10? The NCAA has to do their investigation and than do the equivalent of a grand jury to ask is there enough. I have no problem with a suspension if a formal accusation has been made. The NCAA has to follow their guidelines which is 90 days. You are sounding like frontier or southern justice and want someone on the end of the noose.
What? It happens all the time. In fact, Michigan suspended your OC when suspicions came out and then fired him later when the investigation showed it was a fireable offense.
 
That is not how law works. What would happen if it turns out it was nothing? And who is they? The NCAA or the Big10? The NCAA has to do their investigation and than do the equivalent of a grand jury to ask is there enough. I have no problem with a suspension if a formal accusation has been made. The NCAA has to follow their guidelines which is 90 days. You are sounding like frontier or southern justice and want someone on the end of the noose.
This isn't a legal matter. This is a private member organization deciding how to enforce their rules. The Big Ten, who does not have well articulated rules for this sort of thing, can more or less do whatever they want (there are some rules about who has to approve punishments but that's about it).

Michigan could choose make it a legal matter post hoc but as other point out that opens up a lot of cans of worms regarding testimony from people who otherwise aren't required to make statements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bison13
So one theme from the Ann Arbor gaslighters is that the Big 10 won’t act while an investigation is ongoing. But then there’s this (emphasis mine):

“The most powerful message, according to sources familiar with the call, came from Michigan State athletic director Alan Haller. He mentioned the alterations Michigan State needed to undergo in order to prepare for its game with Michigan after receiving a call Wednesday of that game week about Michigan having Michigan State’s signals.

Haller worried about players potentially getting hurt because Michigan players, in theory, knew where they’d be going on plays.

He also referenced last year, when he said the Big Ten forced Michigan State to suspend numerous players after the tunnel incident in Ann Arbor before the league finished investigating the incident. He pointed out that it was hypocritical that this year, with Michigan under investigation, the league is now waiting for an investigation to unfold.

Haller is not typically one of the more vocal athletic directors on calls, so both his voice and the passion he spoke with resonated with the athletic directors and Big Ten officials on the call, sources said.”
Michigan State ran the play in for two series. Than they stopped. It was all show because MSU had changed up their calls as they always do. Haller has his own problems to take care of on his watch.
 
This isn't a legal matter. This is a private member organization deciding how to enforce their rules. The Big Ten, who does not have well articulated rules for this sort of thing, can more or less do whatever they want (there are some rules about who has to approve punishments but that's about it).

Michigan could choose make it a legal matter post hoc but as other point out that opens up a lot of cans of worms regarding testimony from people who otherwise aren't required to make statements.
You are correct. Unlike the NFL and Goodell, the NCAA nor the Big10 has the role hegemon. If the target school feels they are unfairly targeted they will call out the emperor has no clothes. If the investigation does show that Michigan coaches were aware of Stalions conduct I am fine with a suspension. If this was Stalions acting on his own and the NCAA still wants to put on a heavy hammer, I would hope Michigan resists.
 
What an interesting theory. Fantastic, in fact. Really explains why he had a blank sheet on his clip board instead of MSU’s signs. Explains why he was recording for later review. And really explains why he was hiding in the background talking to no one. So just how was he helping CMU?
It is a speculation. The speculation is he was actively assisting CMU in attempting to steal signs. A MAC teams does not budget for a dedicated sign stealer. I would argue that if Stallions was there to steal signs for future use, it would have been easier to be in the stands at elevation where he could record the entire game.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: okcpokefan12
It is a speculation. The speculation is he was actively assisting CMU in attempting to steal signs. A MAC teams does not budget for a dedicated sign stealer. I would argue that if Stallions was there to steal signs for future use, it would have been easier to be in the stands at elevation where he could record the entire game.
Well you sold me. Everyone knows that the Laws of Physics and Historic flaws in camera technology prevent their effective usage when one is standing closer to the target at the same elevation.
 
It is a speculation. The speculation is he was actively assisting CMU in attempting to steal signs. A MAC teams does not budget for a dedicated sign stealer. I would argue that if Stallions was there to steal signs for future use, it would have been easier to be in the stands at elevation where he could record the entire game.

The payments aren’t speculation, the dozens of preprinted and laminated signal sheets he’s photographed holding during games aren’t speculation, the videos of him interacting with both coordinators while they call plays while he is referencing the sheets are not speculation, the ticket purchases aren’t speculation and the video of people in the seats he purchased recording the sidelines aren’t speculation.

At this point you could walk in on Stalions banging your wife and call the affair speculation until the DNA test 9 months later
 
The payments aren’t speculation, the dozens of preprinted and laminated signal sheets he’s photographed holding during games aren’t speculation, the videos of him interacting with both coordinators while they call plays while he is referencing the sheets are not speculation, the ticket purchases aren’t speculation and the video of people in the seats he purchased recording the sidelines aren’t speculation.

At this point you could walk in on Stalions banging your wife and call the affair speculation until the DNA test 9 months later
It appears that would be the only way to convince him. Because he’d probably deny the evidence reflected on the films Stalions made of the affair.
 
I believe the odds are as follows:

10% Big Ten does nothing
50% Big Ten suspends Harbaugh and/or coordinators for remainder of season
40% Suspensions, fines and post-season ban.
During the season?
Flip 1 and 3 and then you're on the right page
After the season that make sense not I'm the next 60 days.
 
During the season?
Flip 1 and 3 and then you're on the right page
After the season that make sense not I'm the next 60 days.
If it doesn't occur before Dec 2nd, the league loses all credibility for competitive fairness. You'd have a team in the conference championship game (possibly) who cheated for more than half the season. Not acceptable.
 
If it doesn't occur before Dec 2nd, the league loses all credibility for competitive fairness. You'd have a team in the conference championship game (possibly) who cheated for more than half the season. Not acceptable.
This is what I mean my not being realistic. The odds of a post season ban by then is almost 0 regardless of what you think is acceptable.

Doesn't mean you can't want it. It's just unlikely. Michigan will fight unlike when they tool action against us
 
You are correct. Unlike the NFL and Goodell, the NCAA nor the Big10 has the role hegemon. If the target school feels they are unfairly targeted they will call out the emperor has no clothes. If the investigation does show that Michigan coaches were aware of Stalions conduct I am fine with a suspension. If this was Stalions acting on his own and the NCAA still wants to put on a heavy hammer, I would hope Michigan resists.
The converse of that is that if the schools that were harmed by this feel that they are being treated unfairly, they will call out the emperor for having no clothes. Last time I check 13 schools >>>> 1 school. That's part of why UM is screwed (well, that and they are guilty).
 
  • Like
Reactions: dailybuck777
The converse of that is that if the schools that were harmed by this feel that they are being treated unfairly, they will call out the emperor for having no clothes. Last time I check 13 schools >>>> 1 school. That's part of why UM is screwed (well, that and they are guilty).
You're still assuming all 13 ADs will support discipline because thr coaches want it.
 
Based on what?
Everything. Michigan will fight it. The Big Ten gains nothing financially by doing it. They won't rush an investigation. Michigan probably has a 95% of being post season eligible I'm 2023...maybe 99.999999%
The only incentive for the Big Ten to act is public pressure which won't force it. As long as Michigan is fighting nothing happens other than a postseason ban.
 
You are correct. Unlike the NFL and Goodell, the NCAA nor the Big10 has the role hegemon. If the target school feels they are unfairly targeted they will call out the emperor has no clothes. If the investigation does show that Michigan coaches were aware of Stalions conduct I am fine with a suspension. If this was Stalions acting on his own and the NCAA still wants to put on a heavy hammer, I would hope Michigan resists.
Again, how is Stalions "acting on his own"? He is on camera standing next to Michigan coordinators and the Head Coach relaying signals such as "edge pressure" to them, right before an opponent brings edge pressure. I will hang up and wait for your response. This should be rich.
 
You are correct. Unlike the NFL and Goodell, the NCAA nor the Big10 has the role hegemon. If the target school feels they are unfairly targeted they will call out the emperor has no clothes. If the investigation does show that Michigan coaches were aware of Stalions conduct I am fine with a suspension. If this was Stalions acting on his own and the NCAA still wants to put on a heavy hammer, I would hope Michigan resists.

That's nonsense as anyone who knows anything about the "Institutional Control" clause can tell you. If Hairball used the work product without vetting it whatsoever, he's toast. Hairball hired this guy and commissioned him to investigate opponent plays and accompanying signals - if he took a "don't ask, don't tell" approach with the guy, that's on Hairball.
 
Everything. Michigan will fight it. The Big Ten gains nothing financially by doing it. They won't rush an investigation. Michigan probably has a 95% of being post season eligible I'm 2023...maybe 99.999999%
The only incentive for the Big Ten to act is public pressure which won't force it. As long as Michigan is fighting nothing happens other than a postseason ban.
Fight it how? Through the courts? They file for a stay order? Does B10 not have a reasonable opportunity to present its side? Obviously, it wouldn't be the same as UM suing B10 which would make UM open to discovery--something they may not want but the B10 could use that as an opportunity to share information they have that all of us don't have. Would that be good or bad for UM? I would assume not good. Also, if UM were to sue or file a stay order, B10 would respond but perhaps, some or all of the individual schools would file a briefing in support of the B10 as damaged parties?
 
Fight it how? Through the courts? They file for a stay order? Does B10 not have a reasonable opportunity to present its side? Obviously, it wouldn't be the same as UM suing B10 which would make UM open to discovery--something they may not want but the B10 could use that as an opportunity to share information they have that all of us don't have. Would that be good or bad for UM? I would assume not good. Also, if UM were to sue or file a stay order, B10 would respond but perhaps, some or all of the individual schools would file a briefing in support of the B10 as damaged parties?

scUM will use Dewey, Cheatum & Howe.
 
So one theme from the Ann Arbor gaslighters is that the Big 10 won’t act while an investigation is ongoing. But then there’s this (emphasis mine):

“The most powerful message, according to sources familiar with the call, came from Michigan State athletic director Alan Haller. He mentioned the alterations Michigan State needed to undergo in order to prepare for its game with Michigan after receiving a call Wednesday of that game week about Michigan having Michigan State’s signals.

Haller worried about players potentially getting hurt because Michigan players, in theory, knew where they’d be going on plays.

He also referenced last year, when he said the Big Ten forced Michigan State to suspend numerous players after the tunnel incident in Ann Arbor before the league finished investigating the incident. He pointed out that it was hypocritical that this year, with Michigan under investigation, the league is now waiting for an investigation to unfold.

Haller is not typically one of the more vocal athletic directors on calls, so both his voice and the passion he spoke with resonated with the athletic directors and Big Ten officials on the call, sources said.”
haller was the team connection in the ELPD before he got the AD gig....and his players were suspended immediately because they were on film commiting crimes...later charged with both misdemeanors and felonies, comparing apples and oranges
 
Fight it how? Through the courts? They file for a stay order? Does B10 not have a reasonable opportunity to present its side? Obviously, it wouldn't be the same as UM suing B10 which would make UM open to discovery--something they may not want but the B10 could use that as an opportunity to share information they have that all of us don't have. Would that be good or bad for UM? I would assume not good. Also, if UM were to sue or file a stay order, B10 would respond but perhaps, some or all of the individual schools would file a briefing in support of the B10 as damaged parties?
They have a ton of options to consider and have attorneys well versed to advise.
What do you think Michigan would do if the Big Ten tried to place any sanctions, especially a ban on this postseason on them? You think they're going to just accept it? Come on now.
We all know what's most likely to happen here--people just don't like it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT