And so it begins!
Michigan football may face postseason ban amid NCAA probe: report
A probe led by the NCAA could result in the Michigan football program receiving a Notice of Allegations as soon as this week, and the result may include an attewww.si.com
What a pathetic organization..cheating wins again.
Isn't he in the NFL now?And so it begins!
You're not even making sense. Where did I say whatever happened didn't happen?
Wonder why?
it's common knowledge he was taking calls and willing to interview as far back as 2020, his return to the nfl was always a question of when, not if..
Not only did Michigan not win, Michigan doesn't even exist. The university. The state. All imaginary. #LandoLogic
LOL: Finebaum the Foghorn Leghorn of college football. You would think with those ears he could hear the people laughing at him.
Take your own advice--I'm not the one lacking logic but I don't think you even know what the word means.
Oh, goodie. Show me where my logical syllogism was either invalid or unsound. As in, show the syllogism I put forth and explain which step was wrong and why. And ... go ...
You don't comprehend what logic is so I won't waste my team because you still won't understand it.
You didn't even make an attempt?!? Sad. This is like the stoner student carrying a solid F grade being asked to walk up to the board and show how he solved a problem and responding with "Math teacher, you don't even understand math, so I won't waste my team, or time ... or something ... I'm too cool for this, bro! I'm leaving!" Don't worry ... you totally pulled it off. No one suspects a thing. You look totally bad-ass not being able to carry out a basic function.
wjactv.com
there isn't a judge in america that would grant him an appeal regardless of the legal merits based on its optics.Convicted child abuser Jerry Sandusky loses latest appeal for new trial
Convicted child abuser Jerry Sandusky has lost another court appeal for a new trial.A state Superior Court ruling issued Thursday says new evidence presented by
He is just here to cause trouble . That post is 100% irrelevant to the thread. Probably a michigan cheater fan.
88 posts....every one on a Sandusky thread and then posting about Sandusky on a Michigan cheating thread.
www.ncaa.org
Penn State Sanctions
$60 million fine. The NCAA imposes a $60 million fine, equivalent to the approximate average of one year's gross revenues from the Penn State football program,
The NCAA rolled back some of the sanctions after PSU cooperated with them and their representative George Mitchell.
Penn State Sanctions
$60 million fine. The NCAA imposes a $60 million fine, equivalent to the approximate average of one year's gross revenues from the Penn State football program,
The NCAA rolled back some of the sanctions after PSU cooperated with them and their representative George Mitchell.
Not all sanctions were removed. Do you have a cite that says otherwise? PSU still had to pay $60 million and they had George Mitchell there ensuring their ethics compliance. Many other sanctions were rolled back before the lawsuit due to PS cooperation. The NCAA did find rules violations and those are cited in the letter that Emmert sent to Erickson. Namely, violations of Article 2 of the NCAA Constitution. PSU pled guilty to such by accepting the consent decree rather than a regular NCAA Investigation and relied on the Freeh report which the subsequent criminal convictions of Graham Spanier, Tim Curley and Gary Schultz with subsequent prison terms affirmed.
The NCAA agreed to the settlement and Emmert stated at the time that it was because of PSU's cooperation with the Ethics regulator (George Mitchell). The NCAA never admitted that the sanctions were "illegitimate" and no court ever found them so. If you have a cite for that then please provide.
But PSU still paid the money as a result of the sanctions. The argument was over where to spend it.
The NCAA had prior to the lawsuit rolled back some of the sanctions due to PSU's post Spanier cooperation with the Ethics monitor George Mitchell.
The NCAA lost the argument on keeping the money but never said the sanctions were not legitimate or legal nor did any court. Penn State still had to pay. Furthermore, the subsequent convictions and imprisonment of CSS justified the NCAA's charge of operating unethically as a institution as required by their constitution by covering up Sandusky's crimes by it's most senior leaders. The Paterno's kept their lawsuit on until a few years later when they voluntarily dropped their suit (which you do when you're losing).
As we have discussed before. Those saying Sandusky is innocent are doing so to absolve PSU and it's leaders of any wrongdoing. If Sandusky is not a pedophile then the whole scandal goes away they reason. But as you and I know, Sandusky is guilty.
Covering up Sandusky's crimes as Spanier, Curley and Schultz DID violate NCAA rules and that was explained in their initial letter to PSU. There are more to the NCAA rules than just sports recruiting. The NCAA Constitution mandates that members operate in an ethical manner and covering up a Pedophile to protect school image is a violation of NCAA rules. SO, to say PSU never violated any NCAA rules is incorrect.
I don't agree with the deniers logic but they push it nonetheless. As to PSU, the trial of Spanier and the guilty pleas of Schultz and Curley settles that institutional guilt. FWIW, I oppose any and all NCAA vacating wins and think it stupid. Further I have no love for the NCAA either. I think they are a dinosaur.
"In order to exonerate Joe Paterno, you have to exonerate me." - Jerry Sandusky
