133: Bravo-Young 1 seed
141: Bartlett 6 seed
149: Van Ness 13 seed
157: Haines 2 seed
165: Facundo 13 seed
174: Starocci 1 seed
184: Brooks 3 seed
197: Dean 9 seed
285: Kerkviliet 3 seed
Seems like we got shafted a couple of times here to me.
We didn’t get “shafted” …. there’s a formula that’s used and our guys pretty much got what they earned based on the metrics of the formula. If you think we got “shafted” you might want to go to the Iowa board and see how they feel…. lol
133: Bravo-Young 1 seed
141: Bartlett 6 seed
149: Van Ness 13 seed
157: Haines 2 seed
165: Facundo 13 seed
174: Starocci 1 seed
184: Brooks 3 seed
197: Dean 9 seed
285: Kerkviliet 3 seed
Seems like we got shafted a couple of times here to me.
Dean I think did and Brooks maybe but I understand why.We didn’t get “shafted” …. there’s a formula that’s used and our guys pretty much got what they earned based on the metrics of the formula. If you think we got “shafted” you might want to go to the Iowa board and see how they feel…. lol
Brooks didn't wrestle enough matches (only 13 and took a loss) for a 1 seed. So I get it but who would bet that he isn't going to be the #1 wrestler at that weight?That seeding is horrible in a few spots. Brooks a 3 seed???
A. Brooks is going to win the title - he was a machine at Big Tens. Feel bad for the 2 seed, whose trip to the finals will be ended in the semis!Brooks didn't wrestle enough matches (only 13 and took a loss) for a 1 seed. So I get it but who would bet that he isn't going to be the #1 wrestler at that weight?