Noon Games Thread

[lazydave841]

You claimed if he called it in then it goes to replay. It goes regardless.

I don't think he meant calling it in sends it to replay.

I think he meant that a called TD would be easier to correct if replay showed no possession while in bounds vs a called incomplete pass being overturned to a TD.

The replay went quick. They didn't sync the feet with the hands like they usually do (didn't have time).

I didn't see indisputable evidence that it was a TD on what they showed. I was shocked it was changed.

 

[knickslions]

I don't think he meant calling it in sends it to replay.

I think he meant that a called TD would be easier to correct if replay showed no possession while in bounds vs a called incomplete pass being overturned to a TD.

The replay went quick. They didn't sync the feet with the hands like they usually do (didn't have time).

I didn't see indisputable evidence that it was a TD on what they showed. I was shocked it was changed.

No sense engaging him. He always just says opposite. He’s in ignore going forward

 

[LMTLION]

Pathetic fan support at USC! Look at the empty seats.

 

[LandoComando]

I don't think he meant calling it in sends it to replay.

I think he meant that a called TD would be easier to correct if replay showed no possession while in bounds vs a called incomplete pass being overturned to a TD.

The replay went quick. They didn't sync the feet with the hands like they usually do (didn't have time).

I didn't see indisputable evidence that it was a TD on what they showed. I was shocked it was changed.

That's not what he said--and why does it matter how it's called on the field if it goes to replay?
If it was tough to determine on the replay isn't that even more of a reason the ref would have called it how he did?

 

[LandoComando]

No sense engaging him. He always just says opposite. He’s in ignore going forward

Oh no--who's going to tell me to drink?

 

[lazydave841]

If it was tough to determine on the replay isn't that even more of a reason the ref would have called it how he did?

Ref on the field should call what he saw. Replay should be irrelevant to that.

 

[LandoComando]

Ref on the field should call what he saw. Replay should be irrelevant to that.

And he did call what he saw, right?
He didn't believe possession occurred before the catch
Obviously the ref didn't believe it was a TD--replay was close so I'm not going to be critical of the ref. I mean, isn't that type of play the exact reason for replay? It's too close, too fast for any human to be certain.

 

[PSU63-OSU14]

Wisconsin up 14 on the road against 1-loss Rutgers. That game in Madison in a couple weeks is not going to be easy.

At WVU -- no longer a good win, let alone signature win. Beat Illinois? Nope -- apparently not a significant win. Win at U$C? Nope. But Wisconsin wins at Rutgers -- THE SIGNATURE WIN OF THE CENTURY!

 

[Jerry]

At WVU -- no longer a good win, let alone signature win. Beat Illinois? Nope -- apparently not a significant win. Win at U$C? Nope. But Wisconsin wins at Rutgers -- THE SIGNATURE WIN OF THE CENTURY!

Uh, you've evidently confused me with another poster whose screen name begins with L and rhymes with Bando.

From the beginning, I talked up WVU, Illinois, and USC...all three of them...and still consider them all good wins.

In fact, the point I'm making in the post you quoted has nothing to do with Rutgers and everything to do with Wisconsin: namely, they're a good team and beating them in Madison, which hopefully we'll do, would be a good win.

 

[LandoComando]

Uh, you've evidently confused me with another poster whose screen name begins with L and rhymes with Bando.

From the beginning, I talked up WVU, Illinois, and USC...all three of them...and still consider them all good wins.

In fact, the point I'm making in the post you quoted has nothing to do with Rutgers and everything to do with Wisconsin: namely, they're a good team and beating them in Madison, which hopefully we'll do, would be a good win.

Since you're obsessed with me
What makes 3-4 WVU or USC good?
His point is correct. People on this board downplay our wins they hype up teams like Wisconsin for beating MAC level opponents. Wisconsin hasn't shown they're good yet. Maybe they will against us but I doubt it. They don't have the talent USC does.

 

[Jerry]

Since you're obsessed with me
What makes 3-4 WVU or USC good?
His point is correct. People on this board downplay our wins they hype up teams like Wisconsin for beating MAC level opponents. Wisconsin hasn't shown they're good yet. Maybe they will against us but I doubt it. They don't have the talent USC does.

Lando, you're the obsessed one...driven to answer every competing post...to the point of 20 pages...so you can have the last word.

The dude's point was meant to be sarcastic. He just got a little confused about who to aim his sarcasm at. So I enlightened him.

Your shtick is to poor-mouth all our opponents. And right on schedule, now it's Wisconsin that supposedly sucks. The whole act gets old.

 

[LandoComando]

Lando, you're the obsessed one...driven to answer every competing post...to the point of 20 pages...so you can have the last word.

The dude's point was meant to be sarcastic. He just got a little confused about who to aim his sarcasm at. So I enlightened him.

Your shtick is to poor-mouth all our opponents. And right on schedule, now it's Wisconsin that supposedly sucks. The whole act gets old.

You mentioned me. I promise I never mention you.
Illinois was a solid win. Hopefully they keep winning. Wisconsin hasn't beat anyone with a pulse. Fact not opinion. It's another WVU type game. Wisconsin is a game we'll win easily because we're far superior and a legit top 5 team.
Making your opponents better than they are doesn't make you a better fan. It just makes you desperate. We all know Wisconsin isn't good. Watch them against Bama and USC. Talent won out. Like it will Saturday.