I think, at a minimum, the rule should be modified so that if the wrestler in front immediately (however you want that to be defined) "reverses" his opponent and gains traditional takedown criteria beyond reaction time then the only points given would be to the wrestler who gained the traditional takedown criteria. I would even be OK with the rule going away altogether. I just don't see the logic of carving out an exception to the standard takedown criteria. Dean's match against Laird and Vito Arujau v. McGee are just two recent examples of what I believe are flaws in the rule. I was hoping to get some of your thoughts on the topic. Thanks