They might be left out of all of their games in the A.C.C. as well.
The ACC will roll over for them in spades, as they always have. Why do you think this?They might be left out of all of their games in the A.C.C. as well.
They might be left out of all of their games in the A.C.C. as well.
Yes, and conference members are in so much better positions.
Unless Notre Dame is willing to throw some NBC $$$ toward the ACC, I could see the conference passing on including them in so many games...
It probably doesn't sit to well with some of the ACC teams.
Is this when we should feel fortunate that Penn State is in the b1g? I get confused about that.
They might be left out of all of their games in the A.C.C. as well.
If NBC is primarily broadcasting ACC games, why wouldn't there be money?
Among other things.Is this when we should feel fortunate that Penn State is in the b1g? I get confused about that.
So you think that PSU would be in a better position in another conference or as an independent?
Olive branch is a nice civil way of putting it.ACC already extended the olive branch, no?
This - it's to the ACC's benefit to add more ACC teams to Notre Dame's schedule, especially if it comes with the caveat that one or two of those additional ACC games are added to the ESPN/ACC Network kitty.Not going to happen. ACC already said it will help Notre Dame fill its schedule if needed. So. They play more ACC schools, not less.
ND plays six games v ACC opponents. Three belong to NBC, the others to ESPN. ACC cuts ND out of its schedule, it loses revenue as well. Can't give you relative numbers because the ACC broadcast contracts don't breakdown by sport. Don't think that ND has a huge financial advantage per game.