very good article, replete with a mischaracterization of Joe's activities (complete with a link to a 2012 article) linking monsters like JS and Nassar.
Putting the poor research done on Paterno aside, a good article.
Having said that: I don't know why these writers do nothing in regard to addressing the challenges organizations have in realizing they have a child-predator in their midst. The article mentions Penn State, Michigan State, the Roman Catholic Church, The Boy Scouts of America.....why can they not see that all of these cases involve very good people who were fooled and are victims in and of themselves? Why is it that these articles suggest that people at PSU, MSU, RCC, BSA are all criminal elements who purposely covered up?
Until we can get past that, until we can understand that these good guy pedophiles are very good at what they do, until these people in authority build profiles, unearth red flags, install best practices for prevention....until we can admit that many people being burned and scotched were victims as well, we are sentencing ourselves to having to read these kinds of sunday morning articles for several more decades.
Sorry for the rant. I just don't understand why this writer, and just about all of the other writers, go down the path of demonizing these organizations when they are clearly victims too.
Putting the poor research done on Paterno aside, a good article.
Having said that: I don't know why these writers do nothing in regard to addressing the challenges organizations have in realizing they have a child-predator in their midst. The article mentions Penn State, Michigan State, the Roman Catholic Church, The Boy Scouts of America.....why can they not see that all of these cases involve very good people who were fooled and are victims in and of themselves? Why is it that these articles suggest that people at PSU, MSU, RCC, BSA are all criminal elements who purposely covered up?
Until we can get past that, until we can understand that these good guy pedophiles are very good at what they do, until these people in authority build profiles, unearth red flags, install best practices for prevention....until we can admit that many people being burned and scotched were victims as well, we are sentencing ourselves to having to read these kinds of sunday morning articles for several more decades.
Sorry for the rant. I just don't understand why this writer, and just about all of the other writers, go down the path of demonizing these organizations when they are clearly victims too.
Last edited: