It was that painful. I mean just watching it. The loss was anti-climactic. We were all numb.I felt like one of your Norse soldiers standing on a bridge fully knowing that I was going to get stabbed from below.
It was that painful. I mean just watching it. The loss was anti-climactic. We were all numb.I felt like one of your Norse soldiers standing on a bridge fully knowing that I was going to get stabbed from below.
It was weird....One could predict the outcome midway through Q3, but not the painful process.It was that painful. I mean just watching it. The loss was anti-climactic. We were all numb.
That’s pretty much next weeks game thread right there.You should start a thread with this title. It will be a great place to vent and laugh.
They'll march SC out until he can't walk. They have nothing else.Next week could be a loss of epic proportions. Maybe 75-0. I see no point in playing a hurt SC. Season is over folks. May not be another win between bad coaching combined with injuries.
This is the most damning stat by far.
This was worse. 2000 team was not good at 5-7. Illinois won throwing for 30 yards iirc. And losing turnovers 3-0.Worst lost since Toledo
That was my takeaway. Lack of running attack on offense and incapable of stopping the run on defenseNot surprising when you are absolutely incapable of running the ball.
Correction, my friend. Penn State is a team full of good athletes. But they are not a good team. There is a difference.Shame, this was a good team. Punched a little above their weight class at times, but injuries killed it. Coaching is what it is, CJF and Co. can recruit and put guys in the league, but in-game adjustments are not their thing.
The consequence of "Smurf Football".That was my takeaway. Lack of running attack on offense and incapable of stopping the run on defense
Woeful offense vs. a defense not ranked in the top 100. Ranked #102 allowing 427.9 yards per fame. We got 1/2 of that. And 1/7 on OT plays. Playing at home, not bothered by crowd noise. That's how you lose.I need someone to blame for this loss. I choose Yurcich. How do you score 18 points in four quarters, plus nine overtimes, against a 2-5 team?
Agree. 2 weeks to prepare Robison and have a mobile QB. Clifford looked like Roethlisberger back there.I like Franklin but that stat is 100% on him
Don't be so critical. We did succeed once. 1/7 is not bad vs a #102 ranked defense.Agree. Probably the most damaging loss in memory.
For the number of OTs that occurred, it will be replayed over and over again on national TV highlight shows for years to come.
Fluke plays, penalties, turnovers aside. Fair or not, we will be viewed as the team that could not line up and put away a conference bottom-feeder given nine tries at it.
So they try it 3 or 4 times in OT when an INT means nothing when going for 2. UnbelievableNot surprising when you are absolutely incapable of running the ball.
Ilinois 67 carries for 357 yards.Woeful offense vs. a defense not ranked in the top 100. Ranked #102 allowing 427.9 yards per fame. We got 1/2 of that. And 1/7 on OT plays. Playing at home, not bothered by crowd noise. That's how you lose.
Everybody gets upset once in awhile but has Penn St ever lost when the the other team threw for 38 yards?Paging Iowa fans ....we deserve it
Hand it off to 21 again! It'll work this time! Dotson has to be pissed!!!Don't be so critical. We did succeed once. 1/7 is not bad vs a #102 ranked defense.
Don't know but the team that threw for 38 ran for 357. Ouch.Everybody gets upset once in awhile but has Penn St ever lost when the the other team threw for 38 yards?
Ilinois 67 carries for 357 yards.
PSU 29 carries for 62 yards.
Talk about getting handled on the LOS.
And they turned it over 3 times, 4 really but heyEverybody gets upset once in awhile but has Penn St ever lost when the the other team threw for 38 yards?