Do you really believe academics account for anything at this point?None of these 4 measures up academically. Won't happen.
Do you really believe academics account for anything at this point?None of these 4 measures up academically. Won't happen.
I think there's an academic floor that the Big Ten has, though I don't think AAU membership per se is a deal breaker (e.g. Notre Dame is a take regardless of their lack of membership there). But most Power 5 teams would be acceptable to the Big Ten or at least any worth taking. I think the one fringe case is Clemson who has the football prowess to be "worth it" but is definitely below existing Big Ten schools and is not AAU; Oregon at least is an AAU school and flagship state university though they are also kinda borderline.Do you really believe academics account for anything at this point?
Sounds like the Big10 wants UW, Oregon, Stanford and ND to make 20-no link just what I am reading on twitter. UW and Oregon could be announced by next week.
I do believe that perceived survival risks will trump academics , but so far, everyone being thrown around is AAU at least...USC, UCLA, UW, Oregon, Stanford. ND is the exception.Do you really believe academics account for anything at this point?
Sounds like the Big10 wants UW, Oregon, Stanford and ND to make 20-no link just what I am reading on twitter. UW and Oregon could be announced by next week.
I wouldn't believe anything on twitter. People are just throwing crap on the wall and seeing what sticks.
I'm sure the Big Ten would be open to Notre Dame (plus likely Stanford) if that were an option but it would need a paradigm shift from the Irish for it to occur. I'm also sure the Big Ten is looking at Oregon and Washington to consider if they would make sense - the schools would absolutely jump if accepted - but I doubt that's impending. I really don't see any other schools making any sense for the Big Ten at this time.
I think AAU membership is a big factor. So far, every school that has been admitted has had AAU membership - although Nebraska was forced to give theirs up over some kind of issue with their hospital moving.Do you really believe academics account for anything at this point?
YesBut the question remains, would UCLA/USC make the B1G west better?
not in the short term. I think the ACC is probably stable for the time being.You dont see UNC or Clemson being in play if they asked? FSU?
not in the short term. I think the ACC is probably stable for the time being.
And when the time comes for "something" to happen, it will almost certainly be Clemson and FSU finding a way into the SEC not the Big Ten. I think all sides will realize that they make more sense for the SEC and that will be their preference and helps the Big Ten having to avoid whether to consider them and their academics.
None of the schools on you list would add anything to the Big. They would just suckle from the money trough created by the current members. Schools like GT, Vandy, Colorado, pitt, Mizzou aren't Big caliber schools.I do believe that perceived survival risks will trump academics , but so far, everyone being thrown around is AAU at least...USC, UCLA, UW, Oregon, Stanford. ND is the exception.
If the B1G would try to stay with AAU schools, the addl P5 candidates would be:
UVA
Colorado
UNC
Duke
Pitt...jk
Mizzou
Cal
Vandy
GT
AZ
UT
Kansas
I'll you guys chime in on who would be likely/viable/beneficial
I think it’ll come down to whether Notre Dame leaves for the Big Ten. That has to happen first; they have the easiest path out of the ACC and their exit could allow the schools with value to the Big Ten/SEC (Clemson, Florida State, Miami, North Carolina) to use it as a way out of the grant of rights agreement.You dont see UNC or Clemson being in play if they asked? FSU?
Do you truly think academics are a driving factor any more?
Fair enough--I guess we'll see how it plays out. I don't think that's true at all but time will tell.For the Big Ten yes. Not a huge factor or certainly the first one, but I think the Big Ten presidents would have a "floor" of academic quality that they would consider. They are in a position where they can be choosey.
honestly, it doesn't matter that much. the only school of significant value but questionable academics would be Clemson and they will end up in the SEC over the Big Ten. Any other school the Big Ten would want is fine academically.
I think it’ll come down to whether Notre Dame leaves for the Big Ten. That has to happen first; they have the easiest path out of the ACC and their exit could allow the schools with value to the Big Ten/SEC (Clemson, Florida State, Miami, North Carolina) to use it as a way out of the grant of rights agreement.
I think we need to stop looking at conferences like we have in the past and look at them as leagues with multiple divisionsPersonally I think 16 teams is plenty big enough and dont even want ND or the ACC schools, but I do think the B1G will be approached by a number of schools looking to cash in. Its a fact now other schools from the smaller conferences are going to want in.
I think this is bigger than that. I think what you are going to see is schools peeling away from the NCAA and creating their own power structure. The "bigs" no longer need the NCAA. it was a marriage of convenience. What we are seeing is that the big spots schools are pooling to two conferences: B1G and SEC. As that happens, the need for an NCAA is less and less. Ultimately, ten years, you'll see these organizations have their own CBA with the players. And when that happens, there will be the one or two big power conferences and a whole load of secondary schools with the NCAA.Personally I think 16 teams is plenty big enough and dont even want ND or the ACC schools, but I do think the B1G will be approached by a number of schools looking to cash in. Its a fact now other schools from the smaller conferences are going to want in.
There's no way--they see the big picture.I see ND wimping out and jumping full time to the ACC.
I think this is bigger than that. I think what you are going to see is schools peeling away from the NCAA and creating their own power structure. The "bigs" no longer need the NCAA. it was a marriage of convenience. What we are seeing is that the big spots schools are pooling to two conferences: B1G and SEC. As that happens, the need for an NCAA is less and less. Ultimately, ten years, you'll see these organizations have their own CBA with the players. And when that happens, there will be the one or two big power conferences and a whole load of secondary schools with the NCAA.
Agree that these are two most likely. Notre Dame is a given should they decide to join a conference. Stanford would be a great get on so many levels. First it adds the San Jose/San Francisco tv market which is a huge desire of advertisers. And we all know this is about money.I wouldn't believe anything on twitter. People are just throwing crap on the wall and seeing what sticks.
I'm sure the Big Ten would be open to Notre Dame (plus likely Stanford) if that were an option but it would need a paradigm shift from the Irish for it to occur. I'm also sure the Big Ten is looking at Oregon and Washington to consider if they would make sense - the schools would absolutely jump if accepted - but I doubt that's impending. I really don't see any other schools making any sense for the Big Ten at this time.
FSU and Clemson aren’t staying put. No way ND can join a 2nd tier league.I see ND wimping out and jumping full time to the ACC.
Notre Dame knows that Clemson, Florida State, and Miami will likely bolt to the SEC. Notre Dame isn't going to stay put in a MAC level conference. They will be courted by the Big and SEC, and then they will pick the one to join. After that the remaining chaff in the ACC will join the MAC and provide them with two new divisions. The remaining ACC slugs will probably never again sign any football recruit above 3-stars and eventually their football programs will regress to club level.I see ND wimping out and jumping full time to the ACC.
Agree that these are two most likely. Notre Dame is a given should they decide to join a conference. Stanford would be a great get on so many levels. First it adds the San Jose/San Francisco tv market which is a huge desire of advertisers. And we all know this is about money.
Stanford is perhaps the number one academic institution which would be a tremendous boost to Big Ten research schools. And it is tied very closely to Silicon Valley which brings more research, more tech, and huge monies from wealthy alumni.
Both help in recruiting by being on the schedule and playing three different Ca teams helps get kids in so they get to play the west coast every year. And it opens up more recruiting in California.
No other teams add near that much to the league.
Appears that no other PAC members knew of this move. Perhaps if Stanford knew what was happening and also asked they would have been brought in ahead of UCLA.But why not add Stanford instead of UCLA if they're so desirable?
UCLA has almost 50k students whereas stanford has less than 18k (undergrad). UCLA may have been brought in to reserve the traditional USC/UCLA rivalry. I get Standord's academic and sports ratings, but it would be a pretty touch choice if you had to only have one.Appears that no other PAC members knew of this move. Perhaps if Stanford knew what was happening and also asked they would have been brought in ahead of UCLA.
Stanford wins the President’s Cup every year because they undoubtedly have the top sports program in the country. And it isn’t even close in the points generated.UCLA has almost 50k students whereas stanford has less than 18k (undergrad). UCLA may have been brought in to reserve the traditional USC/UCLA rivalry. I get Standord's academic and sports ratings, but it would be a pretty touch choice if you had to only have one.
Maybe the needle has changed though. It's not just about market and shares. It's about the bigger picture. Also, we don't know the Big Ten doesn't want Oregon--it's probably that they have other things in the works firstI've seen this theory floating around often. Just dont see many teams left out there that move the needle. ND everyone seems to want I'd just rather not add them. But they may decide to want in. The B1G reportedly doesn't want Oregon, that goes against the mega conference theory if true.
yep..no arguing that Stanford isn't one of the "cool kids" and a great get. But UCLA is no slouch and may have been necessary to get UCA (which breaks the log jam and kills the Pac Ten). Stanford will land somewhere and that probably won't be the pac ten. I'd also say nobody cares about any other college sports than football and basketball. All of the others a break-even or money losers. Most are paid for by football and basketball. If Standford's fencing or skull teams fold up, few will shed tears.Stanford wins the President’s Cup every year because they undoubtedly have the top sports program in the country. And it isn’t even close in the points generated.
Many also consider them the top academic university in the country, ahead of Harvard. Add in a tv market full of filthy rich youngins that blow through cash like Hunter on a cocaine/hooker binge. TV networks would kill for that market.
Some of top researchers in the world. Great connections to all massive global tech companies. Great connections to China, all of Asia, and more that will help make the Big a global network.
That's about right. Oregon and Washington will still be there at any point if the Big Ten wants them. The SEC isn't going after them and it doesn't matter what goes on with the Pac-12 or Big 12 - any team will jump from those conferences when given a chance.
That's about right. Oregon and Washington will still be there at any point if the Big Ten wants them. The SEC isn't going after them and it doesn't matter what goes on with the Pac-12 or Big 12 - any team will jump from those conferences when given a chance.
Notre Dame is the next target for the Big Ten so they'll go full press there for now. No reason they can't sign the TV deals with the current 16 teams.
The list of other possible candidates for the Big 10 likely starts and ends with the list of AAU members + Notre Dame. Watch them bring in Stanford, ND, OU and UW and then let the divisions be named by sponsors. West becomes the Nike division and the East becomes Under Armor. Puke.To be fair, Oregon and UDub may not be able to bring in an additional $100 million either, but there's always the possibility of Phil Knight buying Oregon's way in with a monster conference endorsement deal (9-10 figures) to the chagrin of UA.
I suspect you are right with ND. I think they will be joining the Big 10 in relatively short order.I wouldn’t get too excited. I’d imagine Notre Dame will spurn the ACC and accept a deal with the Big Ten sooner than later. At that point, we are sitting ducks for the SEC.
I think "for now" in that context means "until ND makes a decision."I've seen the opposite reported that the B1G is done with the PAC 12 for now.
Texas won the all sports director's cup the last 2 years, dethroning Stanford's long streak.Stanford wins the President’s Cup every year because they undoubtedly have the top sports program in the country. And it isn’t even close in the points generated.
That's the same I'm seeing in travelling around from board to board with ND and Stanford their 1st two choices. I'm also seeing that both UW and Oregon have applied for admittance into the conference but were put in a "wait and see' mode by the B1G. All kinds of rumors flying around right nowSounds like the Big10 wants UW, Oregon, Stanford and ND to make 20-no link just what I am reading on twitter. UW and Oregon could be announced by next week.
20 is 4 pods of 5---the Pac XII obviously makes up 1--it will be interesting to see what they do with the rest if they get to 20 using that groupThat's the same I'm seeing in travelling around from board to board with ND and Stanford their 1st two choices. I'm also seeing that both UW and Oregon have applied for admittance into the conference but were put in a "wait and see' mode by the B1G