ADVERTISEMENT

OK, time for sunday afternoon conpiracy theories re "new" sandusky victim

simons96

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2013
10,119
6,858
1
Plano, TX
Anthony Spinelli gets Oct 22 court date to argue that the OAG should file charges based on his allegations

ok, here's where I am having the disconnect, in light of the bogus PSU campus victims . . .

he went to law enforcement with his allegations in 2011. according to the OAG, they found his testimony "credible and compelling"

he was allegedly groomed from a PSU football camp and molested on campus.

why would the OAG take a pass on this guy? Seems like he would have been the perfect "victim" to tangibly connect Sandusky's crimes to Penn State. weird . . .
 
Anthony Spinelli gets Oct 22 court date to argue that the OAG should file charges based on his allegations

ok, here's where I am having the disconnect, in light of the bogus PSU campus victims . . .

he went to law enforcement with his allegations in 2011. according to the OAG, they found his testimony "credible and compelling"

he was allegedly groomed from a PSU football camp and molested on campus.

why would the OAG take a pass on this guy? Seems like he would have been the perfect "victim" to tangibly connect Sandusky's crimes to Penn State. weird . . .


Simple one to answer, I think. The guy's got a past that would not be good optics.
 
Anthony Spinelli gets Oct 22 court date to argue that the OAG should file charges based on his allegations

ok, here's where I am having the disconnect, in light of the bogus PSU campus victims . . .

he went to law enforcement with his allegations in 2011. according to the OAG, they found his testimony "credible and compelling"

he was allegedly groomed from a PSU football camp and molested on campus.

why would the OAG take a pass on this guy? Seems like he would have been the perfect "victim" to tangibly connect Sandusky's crimes to Penn State. weird . . .[/QUOTE
Wasn't there a statute of limitation issue?
 
How many other alleged victims were PSU football recruits?

How many other alleged victims were groomed and assaulted in the course of a PSU camp?

How many other alleged victims have the criminal record that he does?

How many were abused in dorms?

Nothing here fits what I have understood JS's pattern of abuse to be. Would need to here a pretty compelling story and probably witnesses to think think one has much standing.

But, one more chance to pay a victim $$$$ for PSU to cement their narrative, so he just may end up being a victim whether he was or wasn't.
 
Anthony Spinelli gets Oct 22 court date to argue that the OAG should file charges based on his allegations

ok, here's where I am having the disconnect, in light of the bogus PSU campus victims . . .

he went to law enforcement with his allegations in 2011. according to the OAG, they found his testimony "credible and compelling"

he was allegedly groomed from a PSU football camp and molested on campus.

why would the OAG take a pass on this guy? Seems like he would have been the perfect "victim" to tangibly connect Sandusky's crimes to Penn State. weird . . .

The "credible and compelling" wasn't coming from the OAG, it was put forward by the "victim's" lawyer.

When was the last time a lawyer said:

"The prosecutors found my client's story to be unreliable and dismissive"?
 
The "credible and compelling" wasn't coming from the OAG, it was put forward by the "victim's" lawyer.

When was the last time a lawyer said:

"The prosecutors found my client's story to be unreliable and dismissive"?



The above is correct.
 
The "credible and compelling" wasn't coming from the OAG, it was put forward by the "victim's" lawyer.

When was the last time a lawyer said:

"The prosecutors found my client's story to be unreliable and dismissive"?

yeah but still . . . the OAG flat out fabricated victims, but wouldn't take a live allegation to cement their narrative?

something about this just feels hinky
 
I thought the first court had decided the statue of limitations had run out on this alleged victim. Do I have the wrong plaintiff? Difficult to keep these things sorted out.
 
I thought the first court had decided the statue of limitations had run out on this alleged victim. Do I have the wrong plaintiff? Difficult to keep these things sorted out.
correct. it was a statute of limitations issue. And also the OAG did state that they found him to be compelling
 
You know, if I made accusations against someone and I had no proof of anything, would I get millions of dollars?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT