This pretty much nails it.I'm afraid there's only so much that can be done absent finding an entirely different type of treatment, because it's tough to counter all the side effects of essentially poisoning someone.
This pretty much nails it.I'm afraid there's only so much that can be done absent finding an entirely different type of treatment, because it's tough to counter all the side effects of essentially poisoning someone.
Agree 100%. In fact, my clinical GI oncologist is a man named Alan Venook at UCSF. He’s one of the best in the world and why I’m still around. He doesn’t even suggest using PET scans because of the high rate of false positives. The only reason I still get them is 1) for continuity of scans (I started by getting one) and 2) because my heath insurance is fantastic and has covered up to 4 per year.Unless your specialist is a diagnostic radiologist with a fellowship in Nuclear Medicine, then I would advise against having them interpret a PET scan. A PET scan (Positron Emission Tomography) is a totally different imaging technology than an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and requires special expertise in the associated complexities of diagnostic imaging to interpret properly. PET CT is the way to go as it adds additional benefits and specificities in image rendering such as attenuation correction.
I also have never heard of a $2000 interpretation fee, as that is just ridiculous and way, way off from the norm. Now the entire PET scan may cost that much, because the radionuclides used in image generation are very expensive. And don’t get me started on ProScan.
Agree 100%. In fact, my clinical GI oncologist is a man named Alan Venook at UCSF. He’s one of the best in the world and why I’m still around. He doesn’t even suggest using PET scans because of the high rate of false positives. The only reason I still get them is 1) for continuity of scans (I started by getting one) and 2) because my heath insurance is fantastic and has covered up to 4 per year.
Interesting. Thanks for sharing. I’m admittedly not on top of the latest a couple of years out. I should do a better job there.Mayo now uses a PET MRI. They may be the only place in the country using them yet, but supposed to offer the best images.
That is one beautiful 10 pointer. Wow!!!!!!!!!!Personal cathartic update:
My dad's 3rd round of chemo is tomorrow. His beard has turned into a goatee, which is now on the cusp of being a clean-shaven face. While he suffers many of chemo's side effects (hair loss, fatigue, mouth sores, neuropathy, etc), he has been extremely fortunate nonetheless as he has no debilitating nausea. He discussed with me this past week the depression that comes with the couple days following a chemo session. It was something he was completely unprepared for, having no life experience with depression or the dark places it can take you. Understanding it now, he's hopeful he'll be able to handle it better going forward.
Of course, being the type of man he is, he continues to be concerned with others rather than himself. I can't recall if I mentioned this previously in this thread, but when the word finally came that he had pancreatic cancer, the first thing my dad did was to tell my mom that he was sorry. Having just been told that his own life was likely nearing its end, all he could think of immediately was to be sorry for what it would mean to others. My dad is a blessing and a curse in that regard, being exactly the type of father anyone should hope for, but also creating a standard I can't ever meet as a father myself.
I had a call with the head of pancreatic surgery at the Mayo Clinic last week, and I thought it was worth mentioning because it's pretty cool for the guy to take time and discuss my dad's case with me despite my making clear he would not be a patient there. Dr. Truty is a former college football player who lost his father to pancreatic cancer, and he is worth mentioning here for being a decent human being, and for doing great things in advancing PC treatment.
I've tried to calm down about the PET scan thing. It hasn't happened, and at this point any metasteses could be dead and wouldn't show up on a PET anyway. They should see it when they open him up if it has spread, and close him back up quickly. I'll be sure to bring this up in advance. I don't want to be paranoid, but I want to make sure they know they shouldn't be looking to cash in on a surgery unless it's warranted.
Also, not bad for a pancreatic cancer patient undergoing chemo:
Cincy,Mayo now uses a PET MRI. They may be the only place in the country using them yet, but supposed to offer the best images.
Quick update.
When I showed up at my parents' place for the holidays and my father and I went for a walk with our dogs, he immediately started telling me what he planned to ask his oncologist with respect to CA19-9. He ended it with "so that's that." It was clear to me that my mother had been telling him what I intended to talk to him about and that walls were already up to combat my protestations. I let it go for a couple days. Then, on the night of December 22 (knowing he was to meet with his oncologist the morning of Dec. 23), when it was just my father and I, I decided to show him a video that supports my position (a lecture by Mayo Clinic pancreatic expert Mark Truty, you can watch HERE, he's incredible). My position is that you have to normalize your CA19-9 if you can. It doubles your life expectancy, and when someone is responding as well to chemo as my father, that may mean 1 or 2 more treatments of chemo adds years to his life. Well, his response is immediately combative. Everything is "I already know this," "you've already told me this." Except he also says "this is just one person's opinion, I'm sure there's another study that says the opposite." Problem is, I've put hundreds of hours into reading these studies, there is no counter-study. He wants to treat it as though I'm reading WebMD, or this is "eggs are bad for you, eggs are good for you." It's not. Within 5 years, it will be standard treatment for pancreatic cancer that, if possible, CA19-9 must be normalized before proceeding with surgery, otherwise it's a waste of time. But for now, it's not.
My father tells me "at some point I have to just trust my doctor." My reaction is...why? Trust, but verify. We have unlimited knowledge available to us, I don't have to trust a doctor who finished in the bottom half a mid-tier medical school, why should I? This doctor has no information available to him that I don't as well. He's following presently acceptable protocol, I'm studying what will be the protocol 5 years from now. He told me that I don't understand what I was asking him to go through. I stated I wasn't asking him to go through anything, just that I needed him to know what he was deciding, but he was free to decide whatever he wanted. Very long story short, it was the most difficult conversation I've ever had with my father. I'm trying harder than anyone involved here to save his life, but I'm the enemy. He just wants to listen to the oncologist and surgeon, who are spreading nothing but rainbows and sunshine, and not hear from me, who is saying you have to do this or you cut your life in half. He told me that it is vital he remain hopeful, and I'm destroying that. I say I'm offering the same hope, just that I'm offering the only path to actually achieve it.
The next day my father met with his oncologist and asked to have an additional round of chemo. He had that chemo on New Year's Eve. So, I'm treated as the enemy, but my advice followed. His CA19-9 was down to 144 on Dec. 19. I'm hopeful it will normalize with one final round of chemo (under 37, he started at 3200). I won't fight him to do more. He did not have his CA19-9 drawn at his latest treatment. I said he should and was told "it doesnt matter anyway." Yet now he's going to have it drawn next week at his request. Once again, i'm the bad guy, but then he does what I say he should.
His Whipple surgery is now scheduled for January 30. I'm going to be concerned up until the surgery is complete because I'm worried that with his initial CA19-9 being extremely high, they'll find its spread upon opening him up.
Good news is the most recent CT scan couldn't even identify the tumor. However, I viewed this a bit differently. We know its there, yet the CT cant show it. That's why I argued from the start a CT wasn't sufficient, because there could be tumors elsewhere it wouldn't even show.
Regardless, I've informed my father of what I know. He may not like it or accept it, but he knows it. He can choose whatever he likes moving forward, and I will only be supportive and positive. If his CA19-9 normalizes because of this extra treatment, the hurt I've felt from the reaction to me will have been worth it. Even if it doesnt, I'll know I did all I could.
One final aside. I wish I had brothers more like me. I have two older brothers, one 11 years older than me, the other 3. The oldest barely graduated high school and takes pride in being trash, but is a veteran and lieutenant at a prison. But he has come here from PA to visit my father 0 times since his diagnosis. The other is a high school dropout who likes to be drunk or high more than make anything of himself. He lives a perfectly fine life if drinking and playing video games with your friends is all you need from life. Anyway, on Christmas Eve, when my father tells that brother that he's going to have another chemo treatment, his response is, alcohol aided "that's stupid, you're supposed to be done already." It's a minor thing, but it's just so frustrating that I spend hundreds of hours immersing myself into this, and I have brothers who don't care, and don't care how ignorant their comments are. But they're the good guys for simply being supportive. I'm the bad guy for saying we have to do X.
I'll post again after the surgery. Here's hoping nothing is found to have spread and the surgery goes well.
Quick update.
When I showed up at my parents' place for the holidays and my father and I went for a walk with our dogs, he immediately started telling me what he planned to ask his oncologist with respect to CA19-9. He ended it with "so that's that." It was clear to me that my mother had been telling him what I intended to talk to him about and that walls were already up to combat my protestations. I let it go for a couple days. Then, on the night of December 22 (knowing he was to meet with his oncologist the morning of Dec. 23), when it was just my father and I, I decided to show him a video that supports my position (a lecture by Mayo Clinic pancreatic expert Mark Truty, you can watch HERE, he's incredible). My position is that you have to normalize your CA19-9 if you can. It doubles your life expectancy, and when someone is responding as well to chemo as my father, that may mean 1 or 2 more treatments of chemo adds years to his life. Well, his response is immediately combative. Everything is "I already know this," "you've already told me this." Except he also says "this is just one person's opinion, I'm sure there's another study that says the opposite." Problem is, I've put hundreds of hours into reading these studies, there is no counter-study. He wants to treat it as though I'm reading WebMD, or this is "eggs are bad for you, eggs are good for you." It's not. Within 5 years, it will be standard treatment for pancreatic cancer that, if possible, CA19-9 must be normalized before proceeding with surgery, otherwise it's a waste of time. But for now, it's not.
My father tells me "at some point I have to just trust my doctor." My reaction is...why? Trust, but verify. We have unlimited knowledge available to us, I don't have to trust a doctor who finished in the bottom half a mid-tier medical school, why should I? This doctor has no information available to him that I don't as well. He's following presently acceptable protocol, I'm studying what will be the protocol 5 years from now. He told me that I don't understand what I was asking him to go through. I stated I wasn't asking him to go through anything, just that I needed him to know what he was deciding, but he was free to decide whatever he wanted. Very long story short, it was the most difficult conversation I've ever had with my father. I'm trying harder than anyone involved here to save his life, but I'm the enemy. He just wants to listen to the oncologist and surgeon, who are spreading nothing but rainbows and sunshine, and not hear from me, who is saying you have to do this or you cut your life in half. He told me that it is vital he remain hopeful, and I'm destroying that. I say I'm offering the same hope, just that I'm offering the only path to actually achieve it.
The next day my father met with his oncologist and asked to have an additional round of chemo. He had that chemo on New Year's Eve. So, I'm treated as the enemy, but my advice followed. His CA19-9 was down to 144 on Dec. 19. I'm hopeful it will normalize with one final round of chemo (under 37, he started at 3200). I won't fight him to do more. He did not have his CA19-9 drawn at his latest treatment. I said he should and was told "it doesnt matter anyway." Yet now he's going to have it drawn next week at his request. Once again, i'm the bad guy, but then he does what I say he should.
His Whipple surgery is now scheduled for January 30. I'm going to be concerned up until the surgery is complete because I'm worried that with his initial CA19-9 being extremely high, they'll find its spread upon opening him up.
Good news is the most recent CT scan couldn't even identify the tumor. However, I viewed this a bit differently. We know its there, yet the CT cant show it. That's why I argued from the start a CT wasn't sufficient, because there could be tumors elsewhere it wouldn't even show.
Regardless, I've informed my father of what I know. He may not like it or accept it, but he knows it. He can choose whatever he likes moving forward, and I will only be supportive and positive. If his CA19-9 normalizes because of this extra treatment, the hurt I've felt from the reaction to me will have been worth it. Even if it doesnt, I'll know I did all I could.
One final aside. I wish I had brothers more like me. I have two older brothers, one 11 years older than me, the other 3. The oldest barely graduated high school and takes pride in being trash, but is a veteran and lieutenant at a prison. But he has come here from PA to visit my father 0 times since his diagnosis. The other is a high school dropout who likes to be drunk or high more than make anything of himself. He lives a perfectly fine life if drinking and playing video games with your friends is all you need from life. Anyway, on Christmas Eve, when my father tells that brother that he's going to have another chemo treatment, his response is, alcohol aided "that's stupid, you're supposed to be done already." It's a minor thing, but it's just so frustrating that I spend hundreds of hours immersing myself into this, and I have brothers who don't care, and don't care how ignorant their comments are. But they're the good guys for simply being supportive. I'm the bad guy for saying we have to do X.
I'll post again after the surgery. Here's hoping nothing is found to have spread and the surgery goes well.
Quick update.
When I showed up at my parents' place for the holidays and my father and I went for a walk with our dogs, he immediately started telling me what he planned to ask his oncologist with respect to CA19-9. He ended it with "so that's that." It was clear to me that my mother had been telling him what I intended to talk to him about and that walls were already up to combat my protestations. I let it go for a couple days. Then, on the night of December 22 (knowing he was to meet with his oncologist the morning of Dec. 23), when it was just my father and I, I decided to show him a video that supports my position (a lecture by Mayo Clinic pancreatic expert Mark Truty, you can watch HERE, he's incredible). My position is that you have to normalize your CA19-9 if you can. It doubles your life expectancy, and when someone is responding as well to chemo as my father, that may mean 1 or 2 more treatments of chemo adds years to his life. Well, his response is immediately combative. Everything is "I already know this," "you've already told me this." Except he also says "this is just one person's opinion, I'm sure there's another study that says the opposite." Problem is, I've put hundreds of hours into reading these studies, there is no counter-study. He wants to treat it as though I'm reading WebMD, or this is "eggs are bad for you, eggs are good for you." It's not. Within 5 years, it will be standard treatment for pancreatic cancer that, if possible, CA19-9 must be normalized before proceeding with surgery, otherwise it's a waste of time. But for now, it's not.
My father tells me "at some point I have to just trust my doctor." My reaction is...why? Trust, but verify. We have unlimited knowledge available to us, I don't have to trust a doctor who finished in the bottom half a mid-tier medical school, why should I? This doctor has no information available to him that I don't as well. He's following presently acceptable protocol, I'm studying what will be the protocol 5 years from now. He told me that I don't understand what I was asking him to go through. I stated I wasn't asking him to go through anything, just that I needed him to know what he was deciding, but he was free to decide whatever he wanted. Very long story short, it was the most difficult conversation I've ever had with my father. I'm trying harder than anyone involved here to save his life, but I'm the enemy. He just wants to listen to the oncologist and surgeon, who are spreading nothing but rainbows and sunshine, and not hear from me, who is saying you have to do this or you cut your life in half. He told me that it is vital he remain hopeful, and I'm destroying that. I say I'm offering the same hope, just that I'm offering the only path to actually achieve it.
The next day my father met with his oncologist and asked to have an additional round of chemo. He had that chemo on New Year's Eve. So, I'm treated as the enemy, but my advice followed. His CA19-9 was down to 144 on Dec. 19. I'm hopeful it will normalize with one final round of chemo (under 37, he started at 3200). I won't fight him to do more. He did not have his CA19-9 drawn at his latest treatment. I said he should and was told "it doesnt matter anyway." Yet now he's going to have it drawn next week at his request. Once again, i'm the bad guy, but then he does what I say he should.
His Whipple surgery is now scheduled for January 30. I'm going to be concerned up until the surgery is complete because I'm worried that with his initial CA19-9 being extremely high, they'll find its spread upon opening him up.
Good news is the most recent CT scan couldn't even identify the tumor. However, I viewed this a bit differently. We know its there, yet the CT cant show it. That's why I argued from the start a CT wasn't sufficient, because there could be tumors elsewhere it wouldn't even show.
Regardless, I've informed my father of what I know. He may not like it or accept it, but he knows it. He can choose whatever he likes moving forward, and I will only be supportive and positive. If his CA19-9 normalizes because of this extra treatment, the hurt I've felt from the reaction to me will have been worth it. Even if it doesnt, I'll know I did all I could.
One final aside. I wish I had brothers more like me. I have two older brothers, one 11 years older than me, the other 3. The oldest barely graduated high school and takes pride in being trash, but is a veteran and lieutenant at a prison. But he has come here from PA to visit my father 0 times since his diagnosis. The other is a high school dropout who likes to be drunk or high more than make anything of himself. He lives a perfectly fine life if drinking and playing video games with your friends is all you need from life. Anyway, on Christmas Eve, when my father tells that brother that he's going to have another chemo treatment, his response is, alcohol aided "that's stupid, you're supposed to be done already." It's a minor thing, but it's just so frustrating that I spend hundreds of hours immersing myself into this, and I have brothers who don't care, and don't care how ignorant their comments are. But they're the good guys for simply being supportive. I'm the bad guy for saying we have to do X.
I'll post again after the surgery. Here's hoping nothing is found to have spread and the surgery goes well.
Sorry for the downer on a football Saturday, but I'm hoping somebody on here might have some experience with this. My father has been undergoing some testing, and yesterday found out that while the results of his pancreas biopsy were ok, he had CEA levels of 12.4 ng/ml.
A CT scan and endoscopic biopsy had recently determined that he has chronic pancreatitis, which can also cause elevated CEA levels. However, I've read that levels above 10 ng/ml are rarely indicative of benign disease.
He goes back in next week to have another, larger biopsy, and the bloodwork run again. Anyone have any experience with pancreatitis and elevated CEA levels?
Quick update.
When I showed up at my parents' place for the holidays and my father and I went for a walk with our dogs, he immediately started telling me what he planned to ask his oncologist with respect to CA19-9. He ended it with "so that's that." It was clear to me that my mother had been telling him what I intended to talk to him about and that walls were already up to combat my protestations. I let it go for a couple days. Then, on the night of December 22 (knowing he was to meet with his oncologist the morning of Dec. 23), when it was just my father and I, I decided to show him a video that supports my position (a lecture by Mayo Clinic pancreatic expert Mark Truty, you can watch HERE, he's incredible). My position is that you have to normalize your CA19-9 if you can. It doubles your life expectancy, and when someone is responding as well to chemo as my father, that may mean 1 or 2 more treatments of chemo adds years to his life. Well, his response is immediately combative. Everything is "I already know this," "you've already told me this." Except he also says "this is just one person's opinion, I'm sure there's another study that says the opposite." Problem is, I've put hundreds of hours into reading these studies, there is no counter-study. He wants to treat it as though I'm reading WebMD, or this is "eggs are bad for you, eggs are good for you." It's not. Within 5 years, it will be standard treatment for pancreatic cancer that, if possible, CA19-9 must be normalized before proceeding with surgery, otherwise it's a waste of time. But for now, it's not.
My father tells me "at some point I have to just trust my doctor." My reaction is...why? Trust, but verify. We have unlimited knowledge available to us, I don't have to trust a doctor who finished in the bottom half a mid-tier medical school, why should I? This doctor has no information available to him that I don't as well. He's following presently acceptable protocol, I'm studying what will be the protocol 5 years from now. He told me that I don't understand what I was asking him to go through. I stated I wasn't asking him to go through anything, just that I needed him to know what he was deciding, but he was free to decide whatever he wanted. Very long story short, it was the most difficult conversation I've ever had with my father. I'm trying harder than anyone involved here to save his life, but I'm the enemy. He just wants to listen to the oncologist and surgeon, who are spreading nothing but rainbows and sunshine, and not hear from me, who is saying you have to do this or you cut your life in half. He told me that it is vital he remain hopeful, and I'm destroying that. I say I'm offering the same hope, just that I'm offering the only path to actually achieve it.
The next day my father met with his oncologist and asked to have an additional round of chemo. He had that chemo on New Year's Eve. So, I'm treated as the enemy, but my advice followed. His CA19-9 was down to 144 on Dec. 19. I'm hopeful it will normalize with one final round of chemo (under 37, he started at 3200). I won't fight him to do more. He did not have his CA19-9 drawn at his latest treatment. I said he should and was told "it doesnt matter anyway." Yet now he's going to have it drawn next week at his request. Once again, i'm the bad guy, but then he does what I say he should.
His Whipple surgery is now scheduled for January 30. I'm going to be concerned up until the surgery is complete because I'm worried that with his initial CA19-9 being extremely high, they'll find its spread upon opening him up.
Good news is the most recent CT scan couldn't even identify the tumor. However, I viewed this a bit differently. We know its there, yet the CT cant show it. That's why I argued from the start a CT wasn't sufficient, because there could be tumors elsewhere it wouldn't even show.
Regardless, I've informed my father of what I know. He may not like it or accept it, but he knows it. He can choose whatever he likes moving forward, and I will only be supportive and positive. If his CA19-9 normalizes because of this extra treatment, the hurt I've felt from the reaction to me will have been worth it. Even if it doesnt, I'll know I did all I could.
One final aside. I wish I had brothers more like me. I have two older brothers, one 11 years older than me, the other 3. The oldest barely graduated high school and takes pride in being trash, but is a veteran and lieutenant at a prison. But he has come here from PA to visit my father 0 times since his diagnosis. The other is a high school dropout who likes to be drunk or high more than make anything of himself. He lives a perfectly fine life if drinking and playing video games with your friends is all you need from life. Anyway, on Christmas Eve, when my father tells that brother that he's going to have another chemo treatment, his response is, alcohol aided "that's stupid, you're supposed to be done already." It's a minor thing, but it's just so frustrating that I spend hundreds of hours immersing myself into this, and I have brothers who don't care, and don't care how ignorant their comments are. But they're the good guys for simply being supportive. I'm the bad guy for saying we have to do X.
I'll post again after the surgery. Here's hoping nothing is found to have spread and the surgery goes well.
I appreciate your sharing this difficult family journey with the board. It causes me to reflect on what I might do if a family member, or close friend, faced a similar situation. There are lessons in this for us all. My thoughts and prayers are with you today.Quick update.
When I showed up at my parents' place for the holidays and my father and I went for a walk with our dogs, he immediately started telling me what he planned to ask his oncologist with respect to CA19-9. He ended it with "so that's that." It was clear to me that my mother had been telling him what I intended to talk to him about and that walls were already up to combat my protestations. I let it go for a couple days. Then, on the night of December 22 (knowing he was to meet with his oncologist the morning of Dec. 23), when it was just my father and I, I decided to show him a video that supports my position (a lecture by Mayo Clinic pancreatic expert Mark Truty, you can watch HERE, he's incredible). My position is that you have to normalize your CA19-9 if you can. It doubles your life expectancy, and when someone is responding as well to chemo as my father, that may mean 1 or 2 more treatments of chemo adds years to his life. Well, his response is immediately combative. Everything is "I already know this," "you've already told me this." Except he also says "this is just one person's opinion, I'm sure there's another study that says the opposite." Problem is, I've put hundreds of hours into reading these studies, there is no counter-study. He wants to treat it as though I'm reading WebMD, or this is "eggs are bad for you, eggs are good for you." It's not. Within 5 years, it will be standard treatment for pancreatic cancer that, if possible, CA19-9 must be normalized before proceeding with surgery, otherwise it's a waste of time. But for now, it's not.
My father tells me "at some point I have to just trust my doctor." My reaction is...why? Trust, but verify. We have unlimited knowledge available to us, I don't have to trust a doctor who finished in the bottom half a mid-tier medical school, why should I? This doctor has no information available to him that I don't as well. He's following presently acceptable protocol, I'm studying what will be the protocol 5 years from now. He told me that I don't understand what I was asking him to go through. I stated I wasn't asking him to go through anything, just that I needed him to know what he was deciding, but he was free to decide whatever he wanted. Very long story short, it was the most difficult conversation I've ever had with my father. I'm trying harder than anyone involved here to save his life, but I'm the enemy. He just wants to listen to the oncologist and surgeon, who are spreading nothing but rainbows and sunshine, and not hear from me, who is saying you have to do this or you cut your life in half. He told me that it is vital he remain hopeful, and I'm destroying that. I say I'm offering the same hope, just that I'm offering the only path to actually achieve it.
The next day my father met with his oncologist and asked to have an additional round of chemo. He had that chemo on New Year's Eve. So, I'm treated as the enemy, but my advice followed. His CA19-9 was down to 144 on Dec. 19. I'm hopeful it will normalize with one final round of chemo (under 37, he started at 3200). I won't fight him to do more. He did not have his CA19-9 drawn at his latest treatment. I said he should and was told "it doesnt matter anyway." Yet now he's going to have it drawn next week at his request. Once again, i'm the bad guy, but then he does what I say he should.
His Whipple surgery is now scheduled for January 30. I'm going to be concerned up until the surgery is complete because I'm worried that with his initial CA19-9 being extremely high, they'll find its spread upon opening him up.
Good news is the most recent CT scan couldn't even identify the tumor. However, I viewed this a bit differently. We know its there, yet the CT cant show it. That's why I argued from the start a CT wasn't sufficient, because there could be tumors elsewhere it wouldn't even show.
Regardless, I've informed my father of what I know. He may not like it or accept it, but he knows it. He can choose whatever he likes moving forward, and I will only be supportive and positive. If his CA19-9 normalizes because of this extra treatment, the hurt I've felt from the reaction to me will have been worth it. Even if it doesnt, I'll know I did all I could.
One final aside. I wish I had brothers more like me. I have two older brothers, one 11 years older than me, the other 3. The oldest barely graduated high school and takes pride in being trash, but is a veteran and lieutenant at a prison. But he has come here from PA to visit my father 0 times since his diagnosis. The other is a high school dropout who likes to be drunk or high more than make anything of himself. He lives a perfectly fine life if drinking and playing video games with your friends is all you need from life. Anyway, on Christmas Eve, when my father tells that brother that he's going to have another chemo treatment, his response is, alcohol aided "that's stupid, you're supposed to be done already." It's a minor thing, but it's just so frustrating that I spend hundreds of hours immersing myself into this, and I have brothers who don't care, and don't care how ignorant their comments are. But they're the good guys for simply being supportive. I'm the bad guy for saying we have to do X.
I'll post again after the surgery. Here's hoping nothing is found to have spread and the surgery goes well.
So my father went ahead and had another round chemo on New Years Eve at my urging, insisting this was the final attempt (as though compromising with me). Unfortunately, his CA19-9 went from dropping in half every treatment, to only dropping from 144 to 138. So at this point, my role had to change. He was adamant this was it, he wasn't willing to do more. So it's no longer beneficial for me to push him to do more or tell him that his decision is harmful to his prognosis. Thus, I expressed only the positive, which isn't necessarily untrue: better that it only drop 6 points than that it drop to 80. If it had dropped to 80, it would mean we're still making great progress, we can't stop now. But by only dropping 6 points, it indicates that any remaining elevation is solely due to pancreatitis and bile duct obstruction. Is that definitive? No. But it's possible, so I'll tell him it's good.
He had the Whipple procedure performed this past Thursday. Only 20% of pancreatic cancer patients are even eligible for this potential cure, and among those, 20% are closed back up before the surgery begins because evidence of spread is discovered once they're opened up. My father was fortunate enough to be in the 20% that are eligible, and not among the 20% that are ineligible upon opening. The surgery took about 7.5 hours and went well. The Whipple looks a little something like this:
We are still waiting pathology, likely to come Monday or Tuesday, which will be huge. If his resection margins are positive, the surgery was likely meaningless, and he has about a year to live. We are hoping for (1) negative margins, and (2) lack of spread to lymphnodes, of which ~20 should have been taken.
Right now, I spent the weekend visiting with my dad and pressing him to use the breathing apparatus and get up and walk around. Those are the things he needs to avoid pneumonia or blood clots. He's doing well, but has now gone 4 days without a sip of water or bite to eat. That's an extreme challenge for anyone, but he is strong. I remain very nervous for the pathology results, and we remain on edge until then.
Your Dad is a fighter and you are a good son. It’s important to remain positive.So my father went ahead and had another round chemo on New Years Eve at my urging, insisting this was the final attempt (as though compromising with me). Unfortunately, his CA19-9 went from dropping in half every treatment, to only dropping from 144 to 138. So at this point, my role had to change. He was adamant this was it, he wasn't willing to do more. So it's no longer beneficial for me to push him to do more or tell him that his decision is harmful to his prognosis. Thus, I expressed only the positive, which isn't necessarily untrue: better that it only drop 6 points than that it drop to 80. If it had dropped to 80, it would mean we're still making great progress, we can't stop now. But by only dropping 6 points, it indicates that any remaining elevation is solely due to pancreatitis and bile duct obstruction. Is that definitive? No. But it's possible, so I'll tell him it's good.
He had the Whipple procedure performed this past Thursday. Only 20% of pancreatic cancer patients are even eligible for this potential cure, and among those, 20% are closed back up before the surgery begins because evidence of spread is discovered once they're opened up. My father was fortunate enough to be in the 20% that are eligible, and not among the 20% that are ineligible upon opening. The surgery took about 7.5 hours and went well. The Whipple looks a little something like this:
We are still waiting pathology, likely to come Monday or Tuesday, which will be huge. If his resection margins are positive, the surgery was likely meaningless, and he has about a year to live. We are hoping for (1) negative margins, and (2) lack of spread to lymphnodes, of which ~20 should have been taken.
Right now, I spent the weekend visiting with my dad and pressing him to use the breathing apparatus and get up and walk around. Those are the things he needs to avoid pneumonia or blood clots. He's doing well, but has now gone 4 days without a sip of water or bite to eat. That's an extreme challenge for anyone, but he is strong. I remain very nervous for the pathology results, and we remain on edge until then.
So my father went ahead and had another round chemo on New Years Eve at my urging, insisting this was the final attempt (as though compromising with me). Unfortunately, his CA19-9 went from dropping in half every treatment, to only dropping from 144 to 138. So at this point, my role had to change. He was adamant this was it, he wasn't willing to do more. So it's no longer beneficial for me to push him to do more or tell him that his decision is harmful to his prognosis. Thus, I expressed only the positive, which isn't necessarily untrue: better that it only drop 6 points than that it drop to 80. If it had dropped to 80, it would mean we're still making great progress, we can't stop now. But by only dropping 6 points, it indicates that any remaining elevation is solely due to pancreatitis and bile duct obstruction. Is that definitive? No. But it's possible, so I'll tell him it's good.
He had the Whipple procedure performed this past Thursday. Only 20% of pancreatic cancer patients are even eligible for this potential cure, and among those, 20% are closed back up before the surgery begins because evidence of spread is discovered once they're opened up. My father was fortunate enough to be in the 20% that are eligible, and not among the 20% that are ineligible upon opening. The surgery took about 7.5 hours and went well. The Whipple looks a little something like this:
We are still waiting pathology, likely to come Monday or Tuesday, which will be huge. If his resection margins are positive, the surgery was likely meaningless, and he has about a year to live. We are hoping for (1) negative margins, and (2) lack of spread to lymphnodes, of which ~20 should have been taken.
Right now, I spent the weekend visiting with my dad and pressing him to use the breathing apparatus and get up and walk around. Those are the things he needs to avoid pneumonia or blood clots. He's doing well, but has now gone 4 days without a sip of water or bite to eat. That's an extreme challenge for anyone, but he is strong. I remain very nervous for the pathology results, and we remain on edge until then.
Yeah, that breathing thingy looks simple, silly and useless...but it makes a huge difference. And getting up and walking as much as possible is critical to getting out of the hospital ASAP. I would also suggest when in bed, move the arms and legs around, exercise while lying in bed. The more you move around, the more it will stimulate the metabolism which stimulates the healing process.Good luck buddy. Speaking from personal experience, the breathing apparatus is annoying but a really, really big deal. Keep pushing him to use it!
If I may, I suggest that your dad seek an evaluation at Sloan-Kettering or Cancer Memorial in Texas. They are on the cutting edge pertaining to current treatments. Often it takes time for treatment discoveries to filter down to local hospitals.Sorry for the downer on a football Saturday, but I'm hoping somebody on here might have some experience with this. My father has been undergoing some testing, and yesterday found out that while the results of his pancreas biopsy were ok, he had CEA levels of 12.4 ng/ml.
A CT scan and endoscopic biopsy had recently determined that he has chronic pancreatitis, which can also cause elevated CEA levels. However, I've read that levels above 10 ng/ml are rarely indicative of benign disease.
He goes back in next week to have another, larger biopsy, and the bloodwork run again. Anyone have any experience with pancreatitis and elevated CEA levels?
If I may, I suggest that your dad seek an evaluation at Sloan-Kettering or Cancer Memorial in Texas. They are on the cutting edge pertaining to current treatments. Often it takes time for treatment discoveries to filter down to local hospitals.
So my father went ahead and had another round chemo on New Years Eve at my urging, insisting this was the final attempt (as though compromising with me). Unfortunately, his CA19-9 went from dropping in half every treatment, to only dropping from 144 to 138. So at this point, my role had to change. He was adamant this was it, he wasn't willing to do more. So it's no longer beneficial for me to push him to do more or tell him that his decision is harmful to his prognosis. Thus, I expressed only the positive, which isn't necessarily untrue: better that it only drop 6 points than that it drop to 80. If it had dropped to 80, it would mean we're still making great progress, we can't stop now. But by only dropping 6 points, it indicates that any remaining elevation is solely due to pancreatitis and bile duct obstruction. Is that definitive? No. But it's possible, so I'll tell him it's good.
He had the Whipple procedure performed this past Thursday. Only 20% of pancreatic cancer patients are even eligible for this potential cure, and among those, 20% are closed back up before the surgery begins because evidence of spread is discovered once they're opened up. My father was fortunate enough to be in the 20% that are eligible, and not among the 20% that are ineligible upon opening. The surgery took about 7.5 hours and went well. The Whipple looks a little something like this:
We are still waiting pathology, likely to come Monday or Tuesday, which will be huge. If his resection margins are positive, the surgery was likely meaningless, and he has about a year to live. We are hoping for (1) negative margins, and (2) lack of spread to lymphnodes, of which ~20 should have been taken.
Right now, I spent the weekend visiting with my dad and pressing him to use the breathing apparatus and get up and walk around. Those are the things he needs to avoid pneumonia or blood clots. He's doing well, but has now gone 4 days without a sip of water or bite to eat. That's an extreme challenge for anyone, but he is strong. I remain very nervous for the pathology results, and we remain on edge until then.
Pathology came back this morning. All margins were negative and only a few cancer cells showed up in 1 of the 20 lymph nodes that were taken. Studies show that spread to less than 3 lymph nodes has the same prognosis as none at all. He will need some additional adjuvant chemo to try to make sure they’ve cleared any remaining cells though.
It’s still a long road, and recurrence is common and life expectancy overall is still devastatingly short. However, this was the best possible news, and gives real hope that he will be cured, so a different type of tears were shed this morning than those we’ve experienced through most of this.
I’m so happy for you and your family! Keep fighting....Pathology came back this morning. All margins were negative and only a few cancer cells showed up in 1 of the 20 lymph nodes that were taken. Studies show that spread to less than 3 lymph nodes has the same prognosis as none at all. He will need some additional adjuvant chemo to try to make sure they’ve cleared any remaining cells though.
It’s still a long road, and recurrence is common and life expectancy overall is still devastatingly short. However, this was the best possible news, and gives real hope that he will be cured, so a different type of tears were shed this morning than those we’ve experienced through most of this.
Pathology came back this morning. All margins were negative and only a few cancer cells showed up in 1 of the 20 lymph nodes that were taken. Studies show that spread to less than 3 lymph nodes has the same prognosis as none at all. He will need some additional adjuvant chemo to try to make sure they’ve cleared any remaining cells though.
It’s still a long road, and recurrence is common and life expectancy overall is still devastatingly short. However, this was the best possible news, and gives real hope that he will be cured, so a different type of tears were shed this morning than those we’ve experienced through most of this.
Thought you might like to see this sir.
https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/202...o_YGde1W3glBpp4C1SZuLG2ou0uRpK-a4C6WtcYZtjwu4