ADVERTISEMENT

OT: The PA corruption machine steams on, Kane prosecutor named deputy AG

Republicans ran the AG's office for decades until Kane was elected, and now Shapiro. I don't think anything can be blamed on "one-party rule".
I didn't know that the new one was a Dem (I don't vote in PA), but that was my point, actually- and for how long have they controlled the legislature? You need to churn them over all the time, not that either party is honest in any way
 
Does she pass the eye test? I wonder what she is muttering...The Second Mile ???.......
quiet-emoticon.gif


WEBMichelleHenryDetailsToddlerCarDeathCharges_567133_640x480.jpg
 
Shapiro - Just another leg-pisser


Honestly, with all that we have seen - from all of these hypocritical leg-pissers, it really makes it hard to believe in the existence of any type of "innate human decency"......... you know, all that "religion-y" stuff.

When such an overwhelming majority (a "unanimous" majority?) of EVERYONE we see in positions of power and influence - - - - behaves solely to serve their own self-interests (either directly, or as proxies for those who in turn satisfy their self-interests) - - - -
How can one believe that "man" is some inherently "divine" or "evolved" species.......endowed with some structural sense of morality - and all that jazz?

(Gee.....that borders on getting kind of "Felli"-ish :oops: )


I don't know if it be entirely true or not.......but I do think that what is clear - from a practical sense - one is much better off, is going to be much more accurate and effective, to assume anyone in a position of influence will default to serving their own self-interests - - - - unless and until one can make it more painful for them to NOT do that. ie, Make it "in their self-interests" to do the right thing.

Now....that's a tricky bitch to accomplish. But, at least if we start by understanding what we are dealing with, we have a better shot (maybe not a good shot, but "better") to be somewhat effective.
 
I am finding a glimmer of hope in this statement:

While serving as Bucks County District Attorney, Henry was instrumental in the founding and creation of the Children’s Advocacy Center, a non-profit agency that works with local law enforcement, victims’ advocates and health-care facilities to investigate and treat children who have been physically or sexually abused. The Center’s overriding goal is to reduce trauma to children during their involvement with the judicial system.

“The Children’s Advocacy Center revolutionized how we respond to child abuse in Bucks County,” said Leslie Slingsby, the center’s founding executive director. “Michelle Henry was one of the leaders who made this happen. The Center makes children and their families a priority — and it makes the professionals who work on their cases a team. It’s the best thing to happen in child protection in my career.


Seeing how local and state officials handled the 1998 complaint and "sting", Seasock and Lauro negated Dr. Chambers evaluation and the TSM CEO suggested swim trunks as a best practice when showering with someone else's kid, it would be something if she made some hardcharging public statements at a press conference.

And I believe in unicorns. So there's that.
 
You still can't pull your head out of your own ass? And see beyond your own colon?

Why? She was as big of a fool as was Corbett, Fina.. She broke the law and is going to do the time she deserves. Not saying they don't deserve time, but she is in the same category as they are IMO.
 
You know, I fail to see the moral equivalency of this argument. Corbett and Fina leaked, used dirty tricks ,corruption to ruin the lives of dozens and for political gain. She leaks grand jury testimony to expose the corruption of her predecessors. Yes, technically they are both breaking the law but they are light years apart on the moral scale.
Nate is an idiot.

Couldn't find his own nutsack with two hands and a flashlight..........and is incapable of manufacturing a "logical thought stream" deeper than two skins off of an onion.


so he beats the "Kathy Kane broke a law" drum incessantly - - - -
as if to claim that he is the only person in the History of Ever who is wisdom-y enough to come to that brilliant conclusion, and he is in sole possession of some well guarded state secret (duh?) - - - -
and acts like that is the only thing that matters - or even that his "drumbeat issue" would rank among the 17,457,826,110,629 top issues of impact and importance.


I guess when you got nuthin'.....you think YOUR "nuthin'" must be really something.
 
You'll need those. Follow the yellow brick road , that wizard guy might have a brain left.
 
Nate is an idiot.

Couldn't find his own nutsack with two hands and a flashlight..........and is incapable of manufacturing a "logical thought stream" deeper than two skins off of an onion.


so he beats the "Kathy Kane broke a law" drum incessantly - - - -
as if to claim that he is the only person in the History of Ever who is wisdom-y enough to come to that brilliant conclusion, and he is in sole possession of some well guarded state secret (duh?) - - - -
and acts like that is the only thing that matters - or even that his "drumbeat issue" would rank among the 17,457,826,110,629 top issues of impact and importance.


I guess when you got nuthin'.....you think YOUR "nuthin'" must be really something.

I am an idiot, but you continue to defend a criminal who was found guilty.

I am in no way defending Corbett, Fina, and the rest, but Kane was also a total corrupt POS.
 
I am an idiot, but you continue to defend a criminal who was found guilty.

I am in no way defending Corbett, Fina, and the rest, but Kane was also a total corrupt POS.
If you say so.....you demented, pea-brained moron. o_O


I'm in no way "defending Kane"....quite frankly - as I've said many times - I think she is an F-ing dumbshit, who screwed the pooch a dozen times over - and she pisses me off, a lot......not that any of that matters to circle-jerk doofuses like you. - - - -

Just keep claiming anyone who is not so:

- stupid
- oblivious
- petty
- small-minded
- conflicted
and
- intellectually-retarded.......

as you - - and the other members of the Circle-Jerk Posse:
is "DEFENDING KANE"..........as if anyone even gives a pigeon crap.

 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
I am finding a glimmer of hope in this statement:

While serving as Bucks County District Attorney, Henry was instrumental in the founding and creation of the Children’s Advocacy Center, a non-profit agency that works with local law enforcement, victims’ advocates and health-care facilities to investigate and treat children who have been physically or sexually abused. The Center’s overriding goal is to reduce trauma to children during their involvement with the judicial system.

“The Children’s Advocacy Center revolutionized how we respond to child abuse in Bucks County,” said Leslie Slingsby, the center’s founding executive director. “Michelle Henry was one of the leaders who made this happen. The Center makes children and their families a priority — and it makes the professionals who work on their cases a team. It’s the best thing to happen in child protection in my career.


Seeing how local and state officials handled the 1998 complaint and "sting", Seasock and Lauro negated Dr. Chambers evaluation and the TSM CEO suggested swim trunks as a best practice when showering with someone else's kid, it would be something if she made some hardcharging public statements at a press conference.

And I believe in unicorns. So there's that.
I saw that also, Wendy, and thought for a moment...na...the state politicos won't let anyone investigate TSM without grave consequences. Truly I hope that my reasoning is far off.
 
Given the rodents that have infested The Commonwealth OAG for many terms, the white wash of porngate, the tragic and monumental failures of DPW and CYS to protect children, electing a turd who thought he was a bully for governor........I wouldn't want anyone, elected or appointed to any responsible position in Pa. to walk my dog. They are all a bunch of Surmas.
 
If you say so.....you demented, pea-brained moron. o_O


I'm in no way "defending Kane"....quite frankly - as I've said many times - I think she is an F-ing dumbshit, who screwed the pooch a dozen times over - and she pisses me off, a lot......not that any of that matters to circle-jerk doofuses like you. - - - -

Just keep claiming anyone who is not so:

- stupid
- oblivious
- petty
- small-minded
- conflicted
and
- intellectually-retarded.......

as you - - and the other members of the Circle-Jerk Posse:
is "DEFENDING KANE"..........as if anyone even gives a pigeon crap.


Maybe you, her, and Jerry can do a circle jerk..
 
You seem to have a habit of sticking up for convicted criminals, hmmm wonder why?

Do you have any idea who you are even "responding" to?



How much of an F-tard can you be?



Uh......on second thought, don't answer - - - you'll probably take it as a challenge
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT