ADVERTISEMENT

Penn State 2019 Season articles

Highlight the interesting positions


https://247sports.com/college/penn-...Clifford-Micah-Parsons-Ricky-Slade-133579281/

Lions247 Summer Depth Chart Projection
BySEAN FITZ

Wide Receiver

6 - Justin Shorter (So./Fr.)
11 - Daniel George (So./Fr.)
81 -Cam Sullivan-Brown(Jr./So.)
10 - TJ Jones (Fr./Fr.)

[Sullivan-Brown goes in and out of the transfer portal and is behind a RS frosh]

Wide Receiver

5 - Jahan Dotson (So./So.)
23 - Weston Carr (Gr./Sr.)
12 -Mac Hippenhammer(Jr./So.)
88 - Dan Chisena (Sr./Sr.)* (Awarded scholarship in the spring)
8 - John Dunmore (Fr./Fr.)


[Big deal made of Chisena but behind baseball playing Hipp here]

Left Tackle

53 - Rasheed Walker (So./Fr.)
75 - Des Holmes (Jr./So.)
79 - Caedan Wallace (Fr./Fr.)

[Wallace starts out at OT]

Right Tackle

71 - Will Fries (Sr./Jr.)
55 - Anthony Whigan (Jr./Jr.)
79 -Caedan Wallace(Fr./Fr.)

[Is Whigan ahead of Holmes to push Fries if he has any struggles?]

Defensive End

18 - Shaka Toney (Sr./Jr.)
34 - Shane Simmons (Sr./Jr.)
28 - Jayson Oweh (So./Fr.)
20 - Adisa Isaac (Fr./Fr.)

[I could see any of the Top 3 emerging as the starter by the time Big Ten play rolls around. Isaac will get his 4 games to keep his shirt, am very excited to see what he brings to the table]


no Ellison Jordan in the DT group

Defensive Tackle

54 - Robert Windsor (Gr./Sr.)
53 - Fred Hansard (Jr./So.)
88 - Judge Culpepper (So./Fr.)
91 - D'Von Ellies (Fr./Fr.)


Defensive Tackle

55 - Antonio Shelton (Sr./Jr.)
93 - PJ Mustipher (So./So.)
90 - Damion Barber (Jr./So.)
27 - Aeneas Hawkins (So./Fr.)
44 - Joseph Appiah Darkwa (Fr./Fr.)
 
Highlight the interesting positions


https://247sports.com/college/penn-...Clifford-Micah-Parsons-Ricky-Slade-133579281/

Lions247 Summer Depth Chart Projection
BySEAN FITZ

Wide Receiver

6 - Justin Shorter (So./Fr.)
11 - Daniel George (So./Fr.)
81 -Cam Sullivan-Brown(Jr./So.)
10 - TJ Jones (Fr./Fr.)

[Sullivan-Brown goes in and out of the transfer portal and is behind a RS frosh]

Wide Receiver

5 - Jahan Dotson (So./So.)
23 - Weston Carr (Gr./Sr.)
12 -Mac Hippenhammer(Jr./So.)
88 - Dan Chisena (Sr./Sr.)* (Awarded scholarship in the spring)
8 - John Dunmore (Fr./Fr.)


[Big deal made of Chisena but behind baseball playing Hipp here]

Left Tackle

53 - Rasheed Walker (So./Fr.)
75 - Des Holmes (Jr./So.)
79 - Caedan Wallace (Fr./Fr.)

[Wallace starts out at OT]

Right Tackle

71 - Will Fries (Sr./Jr.)
55 - Anthony Whigan (Jr./Jr.)
79 -Caedan Wallace(Fr./Fr.)

[Is Whigan ahead of Holmes to push Fries if he has any struggles?]

Defensive End

18 - Shaka Toney (Sr./Jr.)
34 - Shane Simmons (Sr./Jr.)
28 - Jayson Oweh (So./Fr.)
20 - Adisa Isaac (Fr./Fr.)

[I could see any of the Top 3 emerging as the starter by the time Big Ten play rolls around. Isaac will get his 4 games to keep his shirt, am very excited to see what he brings to the table]

Fitz misses Hamler.... lol
 
Uhh, click the link. Judge said he was only highlighting a few interesting ones. Hamlet is there

He was a burner.

hamlet-27.jpg
 
I do like the KSN podcasts. For the Friday show this week, Ross talked a lot about the recent spate of commits that PS has received and how there are some definite projects among these players. There were a few projects at defensive line in the 2019 class as well. Ross talked a lot about the risk involved in these sort of decisions and how rare it is for top 10 teams to pursue the "project development" strategy that PS is going all in on recently. It is going to be fascinating to see how some of these guys do after 2-3 years in the program.
 
I do like the KSN podcasts. For the Friday show this week, Ross talked a lot about the recent spate of commits that PS has received and how there are some definite projects among these players. There were a few projects at defensive line in the 2019 class as well. Ross talked a lot about the risk involved in these sort of decisions and how rare it is for top 10 teams to pursue the "project development" strategy that PS is going all in on recently. It is going to be fascinating to see how some of these guys do after 2-3 years in the program.
The portal is a new era. If the kid knows it isn't working for him he's as likely to leave as the coaches are to want to bring in a different player, if not more.
 
I'm sure the "rising star" will trigger some Penn State fans, but lets see what he can do with a WR corp not allergic to catching the football and a QB with two healthy shoulders, knees.

 
From Galt:

Talked about Brisker in almost hushed tones. Showed up at 198, is at 213 now. Strong, fast kid. “A stud”.

Great comments about Rasheed Walker. Talked about what a great athlete Clifford is. Luketa has really come on, 37” vert, 4.68 40 at 247. Shaka at 244, low 4.5 40, put up 24 reps of 225lbs. Played last year at 217-219. Thinks he’ll make a jump.
 


After the PSU linebackers beat the tight ends and quarterbacks in the tug of war, LBs Micah Parsons (left) and Cam Brown (right) talked some serious smack to TE Pat Freiermuth. Rather than absorb it directly, he turned away and laughed. It was all in fun.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: psuaxe70
I'm sure to some degree it's just Plan B recruits after Plan A decommitted or committed elsewhere.

But it may also be by design. Sometimes recruiting classes make sense in the context of the classes that came before. The 2018 and 2019 classes are looking really good at this point; there's such a logjam of talent that some 2019 players (the 5 star LBs for example) may redshirt even if they're ready for college football now.

So maybe it made sense, for the 2020 class, to use some spots for high-ceiling 3-star players who need a lot of physical and/or skills development before they see the field. Maybe that's better than taking some 2nd-tier athletes who are more ready right now but have a lower ceiling.

Plus the transfer portal changes things so much. If PSU needs immediate help at positions, increasingly the coaches could be turning more to the transfer portal -- and scholarship spots for those transfer players will come from PSU players transferring out.

You know Franklin and staff are always trying to take advantage of the ways college football is changing. Something PSU wasn't exactly known for 10 years ago.


I do like the KSN podcasts. For the Friday show this week, Ross talked a lot about the recent spate of commits that PS has received and how there are some definite projects among these players. There were a few projects at defensive line in the 2019 class as well. Ross talked a lot about the risk involved in these sort of decisions and how rare it is for top 10 teams to pursue the "project development" strategy that PS is going all in on recently. It is going to be fascinating to see how some of these guys do after 2-3 years in the program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: royboy
OZone writer Tony Gerdeman has PSU as the 7th toughest game on Ohio State's schedule. Below Cincinnati. I'll put each team's ESPN FPI rank next to them below.

Also, what experience does Fields have other than "handing off the f*cking ball"?

http://www.espn.com/college-football/statistics/teamratings

https://theozone.net/2019/07/toughest-game-ohio-state-schedule/

That 2016 season also featured a loss in a trap game. The Buckeyes went into Happy Valley as 19-point favorites, which is more than they were in either the Iowa or Purdue games. Penn State beat Ohio State 24-21 in that game.

Collapsing as Ohio State did at Penn State, Iowa, and Purdue didn’t happen because those three teams were too tough, but rather because the Buckeyes went soft.

For me, however, I’ve got it this way.

12. Miami OH
11. Florida Atlantic
10. at Rutgers
9. Maryland [68]
8. at Indiana [47]
7. Penn State [12]
6. Wisconsin [38]
5. Cincinnati [39]
4. Michigan State [14]
3. at Northwestern [52]
2. at Nebraska [31]
1. at Michigan [5]



tenor.gif




Wow... you have UC being tougher the PSU? (see ... I do read your articles..) * - Wolfman's Brother

That was a tough one. I went with the fact that PSU has no experience at QB while UC does.


By Gerd on 12:22:09 07/12/19

And UC will have a lot of players who never got that Ohio State offer. Plus, they know what this means for Fickell.

Oh I agree... just more of an slam to PSU... which I love. * - Wolfman's Brother [12:26:14 07/12/19]
 
OZone writer Tony Gerdeman has PSU as the 7th toughest game on Ohio State's schedule. Below Cincinnati. I'll put each team's ESPN FPI rank next to them below.

Also, what experience does Fields have other than "handing off the f*cking ball"?

http://www.espn.com/college-football/statistics/teamratings

https://theozone.net/2019/07/toughest-game-ohio-state-schedule/

That 2016 season also featured a loss in a trap game. The Buckeyes went into Happy Valley as 19-point favorites, which is more than they were in either the Iowa or Purdue games. Penn State beat Ohio State 24-21 in that game.

Collapsing as Ohio State did at Penn State, Iowa, and Purdue didn’t happen because those three teams were too tough, but rather because the Buckeyes went soft.

For me, however, I’ve got it this way.

12. Miami OH
11. Florida Atlantic
10. at Rutgers
9. Maryland [68]
8. at Indiana [47]
7. Penn State [12]
6. Wisconsin [38]
5. Cincinnati [39]
4. Michigan State [14]
3. at Northwestern [52]
2. at Nebraska [31]
1. at Michigan [5]



tenor.gif




Wow... you have UC being tougher the PSU? (see ... I do read your articles..) * - Wolfman's Brother

That was a tough one. I went with the fact that PSU has no experience at QB while UC does.


By Gerd on 12:22:09 07/12/19

And UC will have a lot of players who never got that Ohio State offer. Plus, they know what this means for Fickell.

Oh I agree... just more of an slam to PSU... which I love. * - Wolfman's Brother [12:26:14 07/12/19]
Bookmark
 
OZone writer Tony Gerdeman has PSU as the 7th toughest game on Ohio State's schedule. Below Cincinnati. I'll put each team's ESPN FPI rank next to them below.

Also, what experience does Fields have other than "handing off the f*cking ball"?

http://www.espn.com/college-football/statistics/teamratings

https://theozone.net/2019/07/toughest-game-ohio-state-schedule/

That 2016 season also featured a loss in a trap game. The Buckeyes went into Happy Valley as 19-point favorites, which is more than they were in either the Iowa or Purdue games. Penn State beat Ohio State 24-21 in that game.

Collapsing as Ohio State did at Penn State, Iowa, and Purdue didn’t happen because those three teams were too tough, but rather because the Buckeyes went soft.

For me, however, I’ve got it this way.

12. Miami OH
11. Florida Atlantic
10. at Rutgers
9. Maryland [68]
8. at Indiana [47]
7. Penn State [12]
6. Wisconsin [38]
5. Cincinnati [39]
4. Michigan State [14]
3. at Northwestern [52]
2. at Nebraska [31]
1. at Michigan [5]



tenor.gif




Wow... you have UC being tougher the PSU? (see ... I do read your articles..) * - Wolfman's Brother

That was a tough one. I went with the fact that PSU has no experience at QB while UC does.


By Gerd on 12:22:09 07/12/19

And UC will have a lot of players who never got that Ohio State offer. Plus, they know what this means for Fickell.

Oh I agree... just more of an slam to PSU... which I love. * - Wolfman's Brother [12:26:14 07/12/19]

How stupid. No one has played Tosu as tough as Penn State the past three years. Penn State should have won all three.
 
The young guys on offense are expressing a lot of confidence.

Good point ... and one that I think bodes well for the fall. I'll admit that until the first punt/fumble/interception/opponent TD, I am in full-bore B&W glasses mode.

But goodness gracious, look at the weapons this offense has:

1. A 6-2 QB who is touted for accuracy. Yes, we all love Trace, but there were numerous swing passes to Saquon or Miles that had they been more accurate would have led to huge gains or scores. If Sean can hit Slade/Brown/Ford/Cain (and more so, perhaps, KJ) in stride on those short tosses. defenses will be in deep @#$%.

2. At RB, at least 3 of the guys are definite home run threats from anywhere. Maybe Cain is also, but I have not seen his speed reported yet. Might have just forgotten it. But a RB who can turn that 6-yd run into 60 just destroys a defense's psyche.

3. The WRs are almost certainly going to be improved at catching the ball this season. The younger guys -- Dotson, KJ, George, S-Brown, Shorter -- were not so prone to drops as the older ones. While I wish JJ had stayed, he was anything but a TD catching machine. Carr was an AA at his level and catching a pass is still catching a pass no matter who is defending you. And if Sean's passes are more accurate than Traces's from last season, these WRs have the speed to make significant strides in YAC.

4. The TE position is now manned by more experience than last season when PF was a true frosh. If Bowers is healthy, those 2 plus an older Kuntz should add tremendous firepower to the passing game. And we know that Pat and Nick can block.

5. Then comes the seemingly eternal PSU offensive ? -- the OL. After the thousands of games I've watched, I should be able to assess the OL better than I can. I just don't really know what to look for ... I tend to follow the ball rather than notice an OG's footwork or an OT's arm strength. But I expect Menet, Gonzo, Fries, Thorpe/Miranda, and Walker to be solid enough to not be a hinderance to the explosive playmakers mentioned above.

The current Board negativity seems directed mostly at Rahne. While Moorhead clearly energized the PSU offense in 2016-17, he still was the play-caller who couldn't get 1st downs against USC, OSU, or MSU when we needed them. It was also Moorhead who called that handoff to Saquon in OT vs Minnesota ... you remember, the call that was stuffed about 23 times all afternoon. But then, Barkley took it to the house and Joe was a genius. Maybe if Sanders did likewise on that infamous "4th-and-5," Ricky wouldn't be the subject of so much criticism. I don't know. I'm not wise enough to even recognize who all the great play-callers in CFB are. James worked with both Gattis and Rahne since Vanderbilt, and he picked the latter. But then Franklin gets quite a bit of flack here, as well.

It's July 14th. We haven't punted ... or thrown an interception ... or dropped a sure first down pass ... or fumbled at our 14 yet. So I am all in that the offense will be as explosive as it was in 2016-17.
 
OZone writer Tony Gerdeman has PSU as the 7th toughest game on Ohio State's schedule. Below Cincinnati. I'll put each team's ESPN FPI rank next to them below.

Also, what experience does Fields have other than "handing off the f*cking ball"?

http://www.espn.com/college-football/statistics/teamratings

https://theozone.net/2019/07/toughest-game-ohio-state-schedule/

That 2016 season also featured a loss in a trap game. The Buckeyes went into Happy Valley as 19-point favorites, which is more than they were in either the Iowa or Purdue games. Penn State beat Ohio State 24-21 in that game.

Collapsing as Ohio State did at Penn State, Iowa, and Purdue didn’t happen because those three teams were too tough, but rather because the Buckeyes went soft.

For me, however, I’ve got it this way.

12. Miami OH
11. Florida Atlantic
10. at Rutgers
9. Maryland [68]
8. at Indiana [47]
7. Penn State [12]
6. Wisconsin [38]
5. Cincinnati [39]
4. Michigan State [14]
3. at Northwestern [52]
2. at Nebraska [31]
1. at Michigan [5]



tenor.gif




Wow... you have UC being tougher the PSU? (see ... I do read your articles..) * - Wolfman's Brother

That was a tough one. I went with the fact that PSU has no experience at QB while UC does.


By Gerd on 12:22:09 07/12/19

And UC will have a lot of players who never got that Ohio State offer. Plus, they know what this means for Fickell.

Oh I agree... just more of an slam to PSU... which I love. * - Wolfman's Brother [12:26:14 07/12/19]

This is down in the comments in the 'Toughest game by OSU' article:
"Remember there will be 4 new O linemen. A new HC. A new OC. A new DC. A new defense."

plus new QB. If true, wow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGLOV
This is down in the comments in the 'Toughest game by OSU' article:
"Remember there will be 4 new O linemen. A new HC. A new OC. A new DC. A new defense."

plus new QB. If true, wow.

The bolded is always the most concerning. Luke Fickell stepped into talent that Urban won with a year later and Tressel had been winning with prior. The talent level is still high (highest in the conference most likely), but inexperienced in a lot of key places.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGLOV
Good point ... and one that I think bodes well for the fall. I'll admit that until the first punt/fumble/interception/opponent TD, I am in full-bore B&W glasses mode.

But goodness gracious, look at the weapons this offense has:

1. A 6-2 QB who is touted for accuracy. Yes, we all love Trace, but there were numerous swing passes to Saquon or Miles that had they been more accurate would have led to huge gains or scores. If Sean can hit Slade/Brown/Ford/Cain (and more so, perhaps, KJ) in stride on those short tosses. defenses will be in deep @#$%.

2. At RB, at least 3 of the guys are definite home run threats from anywhere. Maybe Cain is also, but I have not seen his speed reported yet. Might have just forgotten it. But a RB who can turn that 6-yd run into 60 just destroys a defense's psyche.

3. The WRs are almost certainly going to be improved at catching the ball this season. The younger guys -- Dotson, KJ, George, S-Brown, Shorter -- were not so prone to drops as the older ones. While I wish JJ had stayed, he was anything but a TD catching machine. Carr was an AA at his level and catching a pass is still catching a pass no matter who is defending you. And if Sean's passes are more accurate than Traces's from last season, these WRs have the speed to make significant strides in YAC.

4. The TE position is now manned by more experience than last season when PF was a true frosh. If Bowers is healthy, those 2 plus an older Kuntz should add tremendous firepower to the passing game. And we know that Pat and Nick can block.

5. Then comes the seemingly eternal PSU offensive ? -- the OL. After the thousands of games I've watched, I should be able to assess the OL better than I can. I just don't really know what to look for ... I tend to follow the ball rather than notice an OG's footwork or an OT's arm strength. But I expect Menet, Gonzo, Fries, Thorpe/Miranda, and Walker to be solid enough to not be a hinderance to the explosive playmakers mentioned above.

The current Board negativity seems directed mostly at Rahne. While Moorhead clearly energized the PSU offense in 2016-17, he still was the play-caller who couldn't get 1st downs against USC, OSU, or MSU when we needed them. It was also Moorhead who called that handoff to Saquon in OT vs Minnesota ... you remember, the call that was stuffed about 23 times all afternoon. But then, Barkley took it to the house and Joe was a genius. Maybe if Sanders did likewise on that infamous "4th-and-5," Ricky wouldn't be the subject of so much criticism. I don't know. I'm not wise enough to even recognize who all the great play-callers in CFB are. James worked with both Gattis and Rahne since Vanderbilt, and he picked the latter. But then Franklin gets quite a bit of flack here, as well.

It's July 14th. We haven't punted ... or thrown an interception ... or dropped a sure first down pass ... or fumbled at our 14 yet. So I am all in that the offense will be as explosive as it was in 2016-17.
Here is what I find strange. Gattis is getting kudos for a Michigan offense despite never being an OC. In fact, if he is planning to run a spread and RPO, he is doing so with a pro-style QB. Granted a good runner, but still a massive change in philosophy and play calling. I guess anyone who coaches at Bama has increased his value immensely.

Then consider Franklin chose Rahne over Gattis. So let sink in. Gattis who has not been an OC and was passed over for OC at Penn State, is supposed to a savior for Michigan's offense, but Rahne sucks.

Will be interesting how this plays out.
 


Penn State’s defense is forecasted to be one of the top units in the country in 2019, and that’s not by accident.
The Nittany Lions’ Class of 2018, and by extension those who enrolled in January in the Class of 2019, have raised the bar around the Lasch Building with a different kind of athlete.

“Bigger, longer guys are coming into the program. Each year our talent pool seems to get better,” said cornerbacks coach Terry Smith. “Our goal is to out-recruit what’s in the room right now and keep making it better, enhance it, and just make sure we get the right fits into the room as well.”

“What I’ve seen are great size improvements,” added co-Defensive Coordinator and safeties coach Tim Banks. “They all came in with certain genetics and coach [Dwight] Galt and those guys have done a tremendous job. You see the Micah Parsons of the world and the Lance Dixons of the world, all of those guys are super big, super fast and long. So they've really gotten bigger, faster and truly strong.”
 
It's a really hard one to guess. Undoubtedly Gattis is a great coach but is he an OC? How much was he involved in scheming and play calling when Moorhead arrived at PSU?

Gattis has wanted to be an OC for a long time; he didn't get the OC job at PSU or Alabama or even Maryland -- it's Harbaugh who was willing to give him the title.

But Harbaugh never really lets his OCs run the offense -- he's more like Paterno, micromanages and takes over when things aren't going well. Gattis will have a very short leash and I wonder if Michigan will really committ to the read option.

And I think the question is a very valid one -- how well can you run an RPO with a big pro-style quarterback? The very same question can be asked about PSU. Yes, McSorley's lack of height was a problem for PSU at times, but with that lack of height you get quickness that you will never have with a 6-2 or 6-4 QB.

This is not about how well an offense works against the Marylands and Purdues of the B1G. PSU and Michigan will score plenty of points against those guys. The question -- for both PSU and Michigan -- is how well it works against Ohio State and MSU who have great D-lines that get penetration every play.

I don't think Clifford is built to be a read-option quarterback. I also don't think Rahne is committed to the read option philosophy -- when he's under pressure (like that infamous third down call against Ohio State) he would rather run between the tackles than let a quarterback improvise.

It's great if you have a dominant offensive line. Michigan will have a dominant offensive line -- not sure if PSU will.



Here is what I find strange. Gattis is getting kudos for a Michigan offense despite never being an OC. In fact, if he is planning to run a spread and RPO, he is doing so with a pro-style QB. Granted a good runner, but still a massive change in philosophy and play calling. I guess anyone who coaches at Bama has increased his value immensely.

Then consider Franklin chose Rahne over Gattis. So let sink in. Gattis who has not been an OC and was passed over for OC at Penn State, is supposed to a savior for Michigan's offense, but Rahne sucks.

Will be interesting how this plays out.
 
I don't think Clifford is built to be a read-option quarterback. I also don't think Rahne is committed to the read option philosophy -- when he's under pressure (like that infamous third down call against Ohio State) he would rather run between the tackles than let a quarterback improvise.

McSorley had 25 more rushing attempts in 2018 under Rahne than he did in the previous two years under Moorhead. Clifford will be a read option QB because that is the offense we run. I'm really surprised by the Penn State fans who insist that Clifford is a stay in the pocket QB; i.e. isn't athletic. He is athletic and will be running the ball plenty.


The fact that Clifford had the third-fastest NFL shuttle time for a Lions’ quarterback since 2012 last winter offers more evidence of that.

“He went from what people would list as a pro-style quarterback to, I think, a guy that is a legitimate dual-threat quarterback who can hurt you in many different ways because he’s worked so hard at changing his body and getting more explosive,” head coach James Franklin said a week ago.

“He’s a guy that the game comes pretty naturally to in terms of finding the open receiver.”

Clifford was also praised by offensive coordinator Ricky Rahne after last Saturday’s Blue-White scrimmage.

“I think Clifford is probably a better athlete than people think he is,” Rahne said. "He was able to get out of the pocket and make some plays with his feet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Option Bob
The thing with Clifford is this: when he came in, he was allowed to sling it. The passes were intermediate to deep level. Hence, everybody sees a pro style QB. Counter to this Tommy, who would come in and hold on to the ball 8 of 10 plays and run like a bull dozer. He had two pretty TD passes as well, but time is unkind. The int vs Michigan lasts longer as it is fresher.

We'll know before long.
 
https://bwi.rivals.com/news/at-quarterback-sean-clifford-checks-athletic-boxes

sean-clifford-775x465.jpg


James Franklin wanted to provide some perspective regarding rising redshirt sophomore quarterback Sean Clifford. “The other thing that I'm really proud of him is how he's worked. He got here and he was a 4.8 and has worked himself to a 4.5,” said Franklin. “So probably the one thing that people question with him is his athletic ability and ability to run. He's worked himself into that type of guy.”
“Speed-wise, he's a really good athlete. He's a very, very good athlete, and he's bigger. He's about 215 right now. He's a bigger guy, Trace was about 198, something like that, so he's a bigger, stronger kid."


.
 
PSU is spinning "Clifford can really run" so hard that my bulls---- detector is on orange, almost red.

I'm excited about Clifford but let's not deceive ourselves here, Clifford is a 4.7 kind of guy, he's not going to keep defensive coordinators up all night worrying about the QB run part of the option.

Teams are going to blitz like crazy against Clifford until he shows that he can beat it with his feet or his arm. Fortunately that will come in the first four games so Clifford and the OL can get some time to develop hopefully without losing games early.

BTW McSorley ran the ball way too much last year not by design but because the passing game was a mess and Trace didn't have confidence in some of the people he was throwing to. And to some extent Trace didn't have as much confidence in his own ability to throw accurately and not throw INTs. When he was under pressure he did throw some really awful INTS -- including the one that almost cost them the Iowa game.

The perfornance of the PSU offense in its entirety last year was Rahne's responsibility and it was NOT a great performance considering the returning talent and experience. All Rahne had to do was run Moorhead's system and keep the players on track, and he wasn't supper successful at either. Absolutely Rahne deserves all the skepticism and hot seat that he is feeling right now.





McSorley had 25 more rushing attempts in 2018 under Rahne than he did in the previous two years under Moorhead. Clifford will be a read option QB because that is the offense we run. I'm really surprised by the Penn State fans who insist that Clifford is a stay in the pocket QB; i.e. isn't athletic. He is athletic and will be running the ball plenty.


The fact that Clifford had the third-fastest NFL shuttle time for a Lions’ quarterback since 2012 last winter offers more evidence of that.

“He went from what people would list as a pro-style quarterback to, I think, a guy that is a legitimate dual-threat quarterback who can hurt you in many different ways because he’s worked so hard at changing his body and getting more explosive,” head coach James Franklin said a week ago.

“He’s a guy that the game comes pretty naturally to in terms of finding the open receiver.”

Clifford was also praised by offensive coordinator Ricky Rahne after last Saturday’s Blue-White scrimmage.

“I think Clifford is probably a better athlete than people think he is,” Rahne said. "He was able to get out of the pocket and make some plays with his feet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSU&Trout
This is down in the comments in the 'Toughest game by OSU' article:
"Remember there will be 4 new O linemen. A new HC. A new OC. A new DC. A new defense."

plus new QB. If true, wow.

Plus, Urban doesn't leave teams that are stocked to win national championships. If this is like Florida, he leaves just before things turn for the worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ELDADDY
tboyer .... was wondering when and how you clocked Clifford .... let's see your proof !
As for me , I'll choose to believe Franklin till you give me a reason not to
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT