No doubt Trace was remarkable during his career at Penn State, but you seem to be conveniently forgetting his injuries for much of the 2nd half of last year, which significantly limited his running and even throwing abilities. It arguably cost us the Ohio State game (although Dwayne Haskins was the real difference maker), definitely cost us in the ugly loss to Sparty at home ~ and rendered the offense completely ineffective against Michigan at home as well. You can’t dismiss his restricted playmaking abilities during our key losses and what a difference it might have been had he been healthy and played the way Trace is capable of playing.
That said, he’s gone and now we get Sean Clifford taking over the reigns. He’s bigger, stronger, been in the program for 2 years as an understudy to Trace, and likely has the better throwing arm with accuracy on all his throws. Sure the offensive line has to do their job, but they too should be deeper and most have been highly recruited and in the program for a few years. We should be deeper and better at RB, deeper and better at WR and likely have the best group of TE’s in the conference. We’re young, but so is everyone else within today’s FBS, with the transfer portal and freshman 4-game eligibity rules.
Haskins made the throws when the game was on the line, which is what great quarterbacks do. Penn State played a terrific game plan defensively, but it wasn’t enough at the end. I’m stating that Clifford is likely a more accurate passer based on his high school reputation at Cincinnati St Xavier and his 4 star rating, as one of the top pro-style QB prospects in his recruiting class. He was also voted ‘most accurate’ passer in an Elite 11 competition as a recruit. Not to mention virtually every time he saw action last year, he threw beautifully accurate balls to the targeted receivers in stride (albeit limited action). As for Trace, he was no doubt one of our best QB’s ever and an outstanding leader and winner. His accuracy was often predicated on his movement outside of the pocket and ability to throw accurately on the run, after extending plays and finding open receivers. When he was relegated to staying in the pocket ( i.e. when he was injured last year), he was not nearly as accurate as he had been, or was when he used his mobility so effectively.Haskins was a non-factor in the OSU game IMO. All he could do was throw screen passes that most high school kids can throw. Almost all of Haskins’ yards in that game (certainly during Q4 come back) were on yards after catch. I am high on Clifford. But I want to see him complete 67% of his passes for an entire season like Trace did in 2017 before declaring him a more accurate QB. Trace ran a lot last year because we had limited play makers in passing game (Hamler was our only reliable receiver). If Clifford has to run as much as Trace did last year, it means there are major problems with other facets of our offense.
I don't recall anything in past about KJ running a 4.2x 40!!!
"For instance, Galt said that receiver KJ Hamler still runs the 40-yard dash in 4.2 seconds despite increasing his weight to 178 pounds."
https://www.yorkdispatch.com/story/...yers-got-faster-and-better-summer/1754156001/
I don't recall anything in past about KJ running a 4.2x 40!!!
"For instance, Galt said that receiver KJ Hamler still runs the 40-yard dash in 4.2 seconds despite increasing his weight to 178 pounds."
https://www.yorkdispatch.com/story/...yers-got-faster-and-better-summer/1754156001/
I remember Justin King ran a 4.29 at the NFL combine. This doesn’t surprise me.
Hmm, think we were predicted 4th in 2016 too.4th in the division. There have been a few polls and power rankings that have come out that have us ranked above Ohio State, but we’ve always gotten less respect from Big Ten writers than national writers as a whole.
This is Jim Harbaugh’s year. At least, that’s what 34 writers from around the Big Ten predicted in voting conducted by cleveland.com.
Michigan was selected as the preseason Big Ten football favorite in a tight race with Ohio State, as 17 writers predicted the Wolverines as the 2019 conference champions, 14 chose the Buckeyes, two picked Nebraska and one picked Northwestern.
BIG TEN EAST
1. Michigan, 222 points (20 first-place votes)
2. Ohio State, 214 points (14)
3. Michigan State, 156 points
4. Penn State, 154 points
5. Indiana, 86.5 points
6. Maryland, 82.5 points
7. Rutgers, 37 points
4th in the division. There have been a few polls and power rankings that have come out that have us ranked above Ohio State, but we’ve always gotten less respect from Big Ten writers than national writers as a whole.
This is Jim Harbaugh’s year. At least, that’s what 34 writers from around the Big Ten predicted in voting conducted by cleveland.com.
Michigan was selected as the preseason Big Ten football favorite in a tight race with Ohio State, as 17 writers predicted the Wolverines as the 2019 conference champions, 14 chose the Buckeyes, two picked Nebraska and one picked Northwestern.
BIG TEN EAST
1. Michigan, 222 points (20 first-place votes)
2. Ohio State, 214 points (14)
3. Michigan State, 156 points
4. Penn State, 154 points
5. Indiana, 86.5 points
6. Maryland, 82.5 points
7. Rutgers, 37 points
Yeah, and that was more reasonable than a 4th this year is. Fuk them, fuk the naysayers.Hmm, think we were predicted 4th in 2016 too.
King's official combine time was 4.31. Galt's quote was apparently 4.2 but you know that probably means 4.2x, if he runs a legit 4.20 that would be surprising and shocking at least to me.
Yeah, and that was more reasonable than a 4th this year is. Fuk them, fuk the naysayers.
2016 Big Ten preseason media votes. Zero for PSU to win the Big Ten.
This year, Michigan will at least challenge Ohio State in the East according to this poll. Voters were allowed to pick ties, and six of them did that for first-place in the East. The detailed East first-place breakdown went like this:
* Ohio State (25)
* Michigan (8)
* Ohio State, Michigan tie (5)
* Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State tie (1)
EAST
1. Ohio State 260.5 (31)
2. Michigan 241 (14)
3. Michigan State 195.5 (1)
4. Penn State 155.5
You’ve written off Clifford’s ability to run the ball before the season begins. Trace did not run like a RB. Other than designed plays he ran for daylight."Keeping the defense honest" is not the same as running for 30 TDs and 1700 yards in 3 seasons. All I'm saying is it's gonna be different without a QB who runs like a running back. Defenses will prepare differently, and they can target the backfield without having to designate a spy.
Wow high praise of Jahan Dotson. Matt Millen should know about talent on the football field. Love it.
Assuming that is TIC?
Did you ever see his Detroit Lions Teams? Especially his annual “WR drafted in the first round” disasters?
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/61244-the-worst-decisions-of-the-matt-millen-era
And it’s not like him to overvalue receivers.... nope, never did that.Wow high praise of Jahan Dotson. Matt Millen should know about talent on the football field. Love it.
Haskins sucked against Penn State last year. The passes he made at the end were all YAC and the catches were a combination of great catch and good fortune (and bad PSU tackling)Haskins made the throws when the game was on the line, which is what great quarterbacks do. Penn State played a terrific game plan defensively, but it wasn’t enough at the end. I’m stating that Clifford is likely a more accurate passer based on his high school reputation at Cincinnati St Xavier and his 4 star rating, as one of the top pro-style QB prospects in his recruiting class. He was also voted ‘most accurate’ passer in an Elite 11 competition as a recruit. Not to mention virtually every time he saw action last year, he threw beautifully accurate balls to the targeted receivers in stride (albeit limited action). As for Trace, he was no doubt one of our best QB’s ever and an outstanding leader and winner. His accuracy was often predicated on his movement outside of the pocket and ability to throw accurately on the run, after extending plays and finding open receivers. When he was relegated to staying in the pocket ( i.e. when he was injured last year), he was not nearly as accurate as he had been, or was when he used his mobility so effectively.
It remains to be seen and no doubt the offensive line needs to do their part in keeping Clifford upright and not having to flush out of the pocket as often as Trace needed to. We’ve got a favorable early schedule for the OLine, Clifford and the entire offense to develop the consistency needed for a successful Big Ten season.
He is such a tool! If the new guy is half as biased as JD, we will still be totally screwed!
He drafted Calvin Johnson, didn't he?