Nobody's going to win in an awful situation like this. There will be no victories.
So..... is this "blaming":That wasn't what I meant. I think the people who were there are absolutely responsible and should be held to account. I object to blaming anyone else
One would expect you are likely 100% spot on........penn state students are adults...parents used to send their kids off to college and they understood that. The parents HAD to have known that drinking and hazing could happen when their son told them he was joining a frat.
The only question is your bullshit.You have to question Bream's judgement being a grown man living in a frat house. I bet his contract has a personal conduct clause just like most people do. If you are going to be a live in advisor then you to be aware of things going on in the house. He chose to be in that role and he may have consequences for it. He has to be aware that you work for a high profile organization so any decision could be placed under a microscope.
It seems that for many on this board, the concept of helping other people when they're in need doesn't compute, either. The kid drank, so "personal responsibility" dictates that if he dies, nobody else shares any responsibility. I think we're fortunate that that's not how the world actually functions.
I am sure they can get Rodney to issue an apology if they ask...
As I am now learning, Penn State has a long history of harsh hazing, excessive drinking and sexual assaults in its Greek Life. Penn State also has a long history of looking the other way at difficult situations. This must stop and all those who are part of turning a blind eye must be held accountable
To me this statement paints this young adult's parents as lazy, disengenuous or both.
They have a right to be upset and angry. They have a right to want people charged that may have had a hand in this. They don't have a right to act like they didn't know what goes on at fraternities or just universities in general, including Penn State, before their son died. Sorry, we live in the information age, with a 24 hour news cycle. There has been, in recent years, plenty of coverage on drinking, hazing and sexual assaults both within frats and on campuses, PSU included.
You would've had to turn a blind eye to not notice these things or to not bother researching them with a college bound son. I understand their grief and anger, I disagree with their attempt at claiming ignorance while denying their own personal accountability to their son.
That is true - however, the University cannot be in the business of offering official recognition to the Lord of the Flies (aka Men of Honor). That is where the liability is.i dont have any problems with SOME of the recommendations...but some of these are just not feasible and they are blaming penn state for everything instead of admitting that students are adults and can govern themselves
It's not too unreasonable to ask that witnesses that didn't act be held responsible, although I'd be curious as to how one defines "hazing" in a legal sense. Also making this a felony seems excessive.Hazing Legislation similar to Massachusetts – Massachusetts law clearly defines hazing and treats hazing as both a misdemeanor and a felony under certain circumstances and also specifies that anyone who is witness to an incident of hazing and fails to report it to the proper authorities will be subject to criminal penalties along with the perpetrators.
I don't have much of an opinion here, I would defer to the precedent of similar laws. On the surface 10 years seems long but if other laws have a 10 year statute then I'd accept this.The Statute of Limitations for Hazing should be extended (possibly up to 10 years).
This runs contrary to their first point which asks for extending legal punishment to all witnesses. If you do that, you kill your efforts for a good samaritan amnesty law which only extends to 2 individuals. This is likely to result in the exact same situation as in Piazza's death, other witnesses pressuring anyone that wants to call for help to not do so in order to avoid punishment for everyone.A broader Good Samaritan Law which would give an individual the ability to confidently call for help without risk of getting in trouble and the victim not getting in trouble.
This is akin to me saying "there should be no world hunger" and just hoping it happens somehow. Of course we all agree there should be no hazing but realistically the university cannot control the actions of adults on their own property. I'm fine with university punishment for offenders that is in line with whatever punishments exist for other similar university policy violations.There should be no hazing, hazing should be clearly defined and at least as rigorous as state and federal laws, and anyone associated with hazing or failing to promptly report hazing will be subject to expulsion from the University.
Controlling what happens at parties can only be done to the extent that the parties happen in locations where the university actually has oversight. If it's on private property there's not much that can be done. Again the family is simply wishing for an outcome with no idea how it could be executed. Expulsion for underage drinking is excessive and will never happen.There should be no providing of alcohol to underage students at Fraternity parties or rush events and anyone found to be providing alcohol to underage students will be subject to expulsion from the University.
Considering that the frats are on private property, isn't this an unlawful search and seizure? So now the family feels that our constitutional rights should be null and void. This is a ridiculous suggestion. Even a landlord is not permitted to enter a tenant's apartment "whenever desired" without first complying with laws about providing notice and the reason. There's no way the university should even consider this.The University shall have the right and jurisdiction to enter and spot check any of the Fraternities whenever desired and will have the right to inspect all areas of the Fraternity house.
For any item in the code of conduct? Yeah, good luck with that. Codes of conduct cover wide ranges of items and if you think a standard punishment of removing a charter fits the bill for all of them you are crazy.Any Fraternity which violates the code of conduct as set forth by the University, is subject to immediate loss of recognition as a Fraternity, the Fraternity is subject to a significant fine and any members of the Fraternity will have to vacate the house.
Doesn't the university already do this to some extent? Perhaps it can be improved, I don't know the details. This is a reasonable ask.All Greek Life members must attend an annual University sponsored safety class in order to remain a member in good standing.
All potential Greek Life pledges must attend a University sponsored safety and orientation class prior to being allowed to pledge.
So the university is supposed to wave a magic wand that will transfer ownership of all fraternity houses and property to the university simply so they have authority to govern it? Completely unrealistic.The University must insert itself with full legal authority to control Greek life, including ownership of housing, enabling monitoring and disciplining fraternal activity.
Now they have stopped with diplomacy and are just being vindictive. They seemingly want to expel every single person at the frat party, even those that had nothing to do with hazing or encouraging their son to drink. Yeah, good luck with that. Ridiculous.Expel any students that you already know had culpability in our son’s death...
Define "turned a blind eye." I can't help but notice that is the same phrase used in much of the Sandusky scandal coverage. The family wants heads to roll with no due process or investigation.Fire anyone in the Administration who turned a blind eye to the issues in Greek Life...
I'm yet to see a single piece of evidence that Bream was in the house or even aware of this party. The family knows this, yet they want him fired because he "had to have known" about this or other hazing parties in the past. Sorry Charlie, punishments for perceived but unproven knowledge of something isn't how this works. Yes you could argue that Bream put himself in a dumb situation by living there, but that alone is not grounds for termination. Once again the terminology used shows that the family paid close attention to the Sandusky scandal and apparently thinks we have a football culture problem. One wonders why they allowed their son to attend PSU in the first place if our culture was so toxic, after all the scandal hit long before Piazza enrolled.Fire Tim Bream ... I understand that he is a part of the beloved Football team, but they will survive without him. You must do the right thing, NOW.
This is complete and utter BS. The university isn't responsible for watching each and every student 24/7. It's not the administration's job to protect adults from what happens on their own time and property. It's a harsh pill to swallow, but your son died because of actions and decisions made by himself and those around him at that fraternity, not because of the administration.Once again, our son died on your watch. We will never see him again because of the Administrations failures to protect him and turning a blind eye to known problems.
As I am now learning, Penn State has a long history of harsh hazing, excessive drinking and sexual assaults in its Greek Life. Penn State also has a long history of looking the other way at difficult situations. This must stop and all those who are part of turning a blind eye must be held accountable
To me this statement paints this young adult's parents as lazy, disengenuous or both.
They have a right to be upset and angry. They have a right to want people charged that may have had a hand in this. They don't have a right to act like they didn't know what goes on at fraternities or just universities in general, including Penn State, before their son died. Sorry, we live in the information age, with a 24 hour news cycle. There has been, in recent years, plenty of coverage on drinking, hazing and sexual assaults both within frats and on campuses, PSU included.
You would've had to turn a blind eye to not notice these things or to not bother researching them with a college bound son. I understand their grief and anger, I disagree with their attempt at claiming ignorance while denying their own personal accountability to their son.
Nothing proposed by the Piazzas in their letter would be able to be admitted into their lawsuit against Penn State, even if Penn State does everything they're asking them to do. The Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence prevent "subsequent remedial measures" taken by a defendant after the fact from being admitted into evidence.Sure, it would be nice for their lawsuit if PSU fired Sims and Bream, because then the Piazza's lawyer would tell the jury that by taking such remedial action, PSU has admitted it's fault in the death.
Looks to me like this family is more than happy to put litigation advantage and $$$ over truth and justice.
And NOT ONLY "recognition"... but - in the case of Beta particularly - recognition of the history of dangerous issues, and promises that in allowing Beta to once again form as a recognized University organization, to take remedial steps and provide supervision - - - - which they then FAILED TO DO.That is true - however, the University cannot be in the business of offering official recognition to the Lord of the Flies (aka Men of Honor). That is where the liability is.
Fine by me. Anybody object?
They have now overstepped the bounds of whatever compassion I might have held for their tragic family situation.
Like HRC, they need to "cope" and stop blaming/suing others.
Um, yeah, but as you might know there are lots of ways around that.Nothing proposed by the Piazzas in their letter would be able to be admitted into their lawsuit against Penn State, even if Penn State does everything they're asking them to do. The Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence prevent "subsequent remedial measures" taken by a defendant after the fact from being admitted into evidence.
Bream obviously isn't responsible for Piazza's death.
But he put himself in a really stupid situation by living in a frat in the first place. He would have a hard time convincingly anyone that he didn't know there was underage drinking occurring as part of the pledge process.
He's an adult, and a university employee. I don't care what his personal circumstances were, but as a university employee he shouldn't be living in a household where law breaking and university rules violations is likley going to happen. Most of us drank underage, but I don't think it's hypocritical to say as a grown adult I want nothing to do with living in a house where it happens every weekend and I could get caught in the crossfire of dumb youthful mistakes.
So you think the parents should just ignore the hazing that went on? They shouldn't be upset that while their son was dying people were taking snap chats with him and kicking him? They should just ignore the fact that the "brothers" were more worried about covering up what happened then is well being. Perhaps if they ignore all that the problem would get better...
?
The statement in bold says it all. They're trying to tie this to Sandusky. "Penn State also has a history of looking the other way... ." Their argument is going to be that Penn State's "culture" is to not address issues head on and instead to stick their head in the sand ala the Sandusky narrative. Someone's looking for a big pay day.
Why would you specify Fraternity members, especially of you have already banned the whole greek system.
Would these rules be for all students? Would the rules be?
1. Mandatory alcohol, sex assault and hazing training for every student every year.
2. Any student who provides alcohol to a minor is suspended for one semester.
3. Any student who consumes alcohol while underage is suspended for one semester.
4. Any student who hazes another student or does not report hazing is expelled from PSU.
5. Any student function that involves alcohol must have private employees serving the alcohol. All people entering the house/apartment/social hall/study lounge must provide valid ID, anyone under the age of 21 must have a scarlet "Y" on their forehead with paint of quality that cannot be removed for 12 hours. Private security can inspect any room/dorm or on campus apartment for a period of 12 hours after the conclusion of the enter without having to knock.
Is this your proposal?
Is this your proposal?
Yep, which is why so many of us have been on here for going on 6 years saying you cannot "move on" from Sandusky and the popular narrative because that taint will never go away. Every incident in the future will always be connected to and consistent with the culture that bred Sandusky. Someday, someone with the university is going to have to stand up and call the Freeh Report and the popular narrative what they are...pure BS. Til then, anytime something bad happens, even when it has nothing to do with football (like this situation) it will be tied to the culture that led to Sandusky.
^^^^ Who left the "Idiot Bag" open today? ^^^^WROng. NObody is going to change their opinions on anything.
It is hilarious that you think PItt, Rutgers, UMD fans will suddenly say, "OUr bad, PSU is innocent."
The taint is there. NOthing anyone can say that will change it. The time to do something was years ago.
If you want to change the bad PR then don't give the press bad PR like Beta just did. MIght want to go a decade without anyone getting killed or raped. The BOT and administration had nothing to do with it.
In the mean time PSU sports teams should beat the rivals into submission.
So you think the parents should just ignore the hazing that went on? They shouldn't be upset that while their son was dying people were taking snap chats with him and kicking him? They should just ignore the fact that the "brothers" were more worried about covering up what happened then is well being. Perhaps if they ignore all that the problem would get better
I bet your suggestion for the opioid problem is for those who have lost love one should just shut up and blame their dead kid?
And if they knew Penn State had a long history of turning a blind eye, why the hell did they let their so go to school there? I would not let my child go to a school if I thought it had a long history of looking the other way when someone was in trouble. More negligence on the part of the parents.As I am now learning, Penn State has a long history of harsh hazing, excessive drinking and sexual assaults in its Greek Life. Penn State also has a long history of looking the other way at difficult situations. This must stop and all those who are part of turning a blind eye must be held accountable
To me this statement paints this young adult's parents as lazy, disengenuous or both.
They have a right to be upset and angry. They have a right to want people charged that may have had a hand in this. They don't have a right to act like they didn't know what goes on at fraternities or just universities in general, including Penn State, before their son died. Sorry, we live in the information age, with a 24 hour news cycle. There has been, in recent years, plenty of coverage on drinking, hazing and sexual assaults both within frats and on campuses, PSU included.
You would've had to turn a blind eye to not notice these things or to not bother researching them with a college bound son. I understand their grief and anger, I disagree with their attempt at claiming ignorance while denying their own personal accountability to their son.
Apparently they don't really have a good grasp on just how big Penn State is. This isn't some little D-3 school where the university could do a better job of keeping an eye on students (even at those schools they can't) but Penn State is bigger than most small towns. It's a lot bigger than the town I grew up in and no one could have kept an eye on me and my buddies. This is an obvious set up to cash in on their son's death...disgusting.The statement in bold says it all. They're trying to tie this to Sandusky. "Penn State also has a history of looking the other way... ." Their argument is going to be that Penn State's "culture" is to not address issues head on and instead to stick their head in the sand ala the Sandusky narrative. Someone's looking for a big pay day.
How could any parent spend a penny the received from the death of their son? I can see wanting to see justice, that I can respect. But any parent that goes after a pay day on the back of their dead child disgusts me.The parents are truly not in their right minds at this moment. Those who should be advising them are looking for a payday.
The sad part of this is that sometime in the future, Mom and Dad will awake to realize that putting a dozen young men in jail and ruining their lives, and the bitterness that they are now spewing at practically everyone at PSU will do nothing to bring back their son.
They certainly deserve a nice settlement, which they will hopefully use to make life easier for their surviving son and future grandchildren etc.
I wish they would temper their rage with the understanding that Tim was not murdered.........an adult, even a young adult, should know there is assumption of risk when you chug hard liquor.
Whatever one may think of the Piazzas:Apparently they don't really have a good grasp on just how big Penn State is. This isn't some little D-3 school where the university could do a better job of keeping an eye on students (even at those schools they can't) but Penn State is bigger than most small towns. It's a lot bigger than the town I grew up in and no one could have kept an eye on me and my buddies. This is an obvious set up to cash in on their son's death...disgusting.
How could any parent spend a penny the received from the death of their son? I can see wanting to see justice, that I can respect. But any parent that goes after a pay day on the back of their dead child disgusts me.
The Piazzas were a lot at fault. They say Penn State has a long history of looking the other way yet they still sent their son there...huge fault. Their son drank more alcohol than a human should allow himself to drink...huge fault. Still not seeing how any of that is Penn State's fault.Whatever one may think of the Piazzas:
There is no question that PSU Leadership - primarily Damon Sims - placed Penn State's balls in a vice.
Actions they undertook of their own accord, over the last several YEARS - WELL BEFORE anyone ever heard of "Timmy Piazza" - and created a ticking bomb.
"Piazza" was only the first match that stumbled past and lit the fuse...... if not him, it would have - sooner or later - been someone else.
Sims/Penn State F-ed up royally. And they will now sacrifice/pay anything they can lay their hands on to protect their own asses.
That's not the Piazza's fault...... they were just the folks who happened to be waiting at the next bus stop.
It's notThe Piazzas were a lot at fault. They say Penn State has a long history of looking the other way yet they still sent their son there...huge fault. Their son drank more alcohol than a human should allow himself to drink...huge fault. Still not seeing how any of that is Penn State's fault.