You really stink at this. This is the only screen name I have. I don't comment on PL articles and I never go to the TOS you are likely referring to (FOS).
Pittsburgh blog is about to make you blow a gasket (selling "Joe Knew" shirts)
- Thread starter bmw199
- Start date
Still posting toilet. Permanently banned?
You, toiletbear, irondork. Elmo, and a few others.
Try again. DJ Saxy.
Clown.
Last edited:
But, but, but... Paterno was the most powerful man in the state. If he found out you did something without his approval, he'd make sure you got lousy service at the Waffle Shop.
I read what your wrote last night which was a bunch of this and that explaining you not wanting to expose "sources" and then 12 hours after initially defending your position you take this jab. You responded to the same quote twice several hours apart. Weird
Why the shot?
You went out of your way to make it known that YOU orchestrated this "take down", but with some help from others (Oskee wow wow effort) and beat your chest over and over about it. Now that it's out of hand you're taking shots at me and all I said was "so much for the August 19th take down". How is that in any way shape or form incorrect? You did an Oskee wow wow effort for nothing. You get an E for effort, but that's about it.
You do like to talk about things that you accomplished that you really didn't accomplish, don't you?
You said you shut down this operation. It's a bajillion times worse now.
Last edited:
I've searched the thread over and over but you know I was hoping to see something like "yeah it didn't work". There's no shame in that.
I've been skeptical about this from day one. You'll never shut it down. I wish it could happen but as aforementioned by another poster the publicity multiplied the effort from the other side. That's why I asked where you got this info from. But you don't want to reveal your "source". That's fine. But it's tough to accept information from an anonymous poster that has an anonymous source. It's completely open ended and requires zero accountability.
I'm Jim Cummings, and I'm more inclined to accept info from a Nellie Rawlings than just a Nellie R.
Look I'm not sure what your issue is, but IMHO you seem to be the person taking unwarranted "shots".
You are clearly mischaracterizing the situation and also ignoring other posts I've written right here to defend yourself for not reading everything. You act like this is the only thread (or source of information) on the topic as well. What your end game is I have no idea. Maybe you shouldn't selectively read only posts attaching your handle and make a better review before engaging in this behavior?
How about an effort to read Amazon's procedures where it takes more than 24 hours? How about reading the email where it says a followup confirmation will be sent when that process is completed?
Have a wonderful day!
Last edited:
Yes, they did say so in the email reply to the customer. Yes, it does. It may take a week.
Nevertheless, it 's not really even the point of the exercise:
I highly doubt even if someone succeeds in buying one they are going to be allowed to: A. Gain entry to the game wearing one. or B. Gain entry wearing one or put one on later using them to try and taunt. I have no doubt anyone trying to cause problems including this additional gameday problem will be removed or refused entry.
Additionally I'm looking forward to that Pitt fan's video showing his beer traveling over 1000 miles from the game to where I will be watching another game, somehow having it reach anywhere near my head, LOL!
There have been many offensive shirts worn by supporters of both teams to games in this long rivalry for many years. It really bothers no one. No one believes that anyone is going to actually SH!t on Pitt. No one needs to get into semantics over a tshirt. Most grownups are bigger and better than that, even the Pitt fans.
You're right, I was off base. It's not like Joe said he didn't know the exact word or term....right?
From Joe's testimony:
Q: Without getting into any graphic detail, what did Mr. McQueary tell you he had seen and where?
Mr. Paterno: "Well, he had seen a person, an older — not an older, but a mature person who was fondling, whatever you might call it — I’m not sure what the term would be — a young boy."
It makes far more sense that he wondered aloud "It was a sexual nature?".
"I don't know what you'd call it".
Get lost you pile of PiT crap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are so wrong. He was the greatest coach in any sport on and off the field. There will never be another like him. None that transcend the game and impact society like Joe. None that care about the student athlete like Joe. None that gave as much to charity as Joe. It's not about the wins. It's about the man. We Are... Because He Was.
Do you know what top 5 for results means? It means results on the field.
1) Bear Bryant
2) Nick Saban
3) Joe Paterno
4) Urban Meyer
5) Bobby Bowden
More like 1,2,4 & 5 are all known cheaters with sanctions to prove it. Only JoePa is clean
Heard he bought 50 for all the sPitt fans that will attend the game
I called today too and got some gal that sounded like she had a Filipino accent. Lots of noise in the background. She went by "Lisa" and said she would investigate. I have her email address to follow up after 48 hours. I asked if there was a record of these being reported and she said 'not that I am aware of'. WTF???
Records will show that sanctions were levied as a result of the action/inaction of Joe. So if you are going to call all the others cheaters you've got to include him as well.
Bull$hit. Joe never broke a single NCAA rule - ever. Nor did any of the kids playing sports at Penn State. No one else can claim that.
So PSU was not sanctioned? What was the reason for reduced scholarships?
Its ok to say you don't agree with them but to claim they didn't happen is to deny reality.
Penn State was never legitimately sanctioned by the NCAA, idiot!
I'll answer your 2nd question with a question..
What was the reason for eliminating the sanctions?
From the PSU football entry on wiki:
The NCAA's executive committee unanimously approved giving back the scholarships, ostensibly after a recommendation from former U.S. Senator George J. Mitchell, who was appointed by the NCAA to oversee Penn State's progress in adopting a number of reforms to enhance its security, ethics, governance and compliance structure. NCAA officials said they took up the recommendation because the restored scholarships would benefit student-athletes.
That is what will be written in the history books. Doesn't mean that sanctions did not happen.
What he said was PSU did not break NCAA rules which is correct. You then moved the goal posts to talk about sanctions. It is well known Emmert tried to rehab his and the ncaa's reputation by executive action. His own people told him he did not have the authority to do so but he pushed ahead anyway because of PR and knowing it would be all but impossible for PSU to push back given their weak leadership and PR. Once the NCAA was in court getting their backsides handed to them in decisions (by Judge Covey) they suddenly dropped sanctions. You know this. At least have an honest discussion.
Anyone with half of a brain would know that is the biggest crock of CYA horseshit ever regurgitated. Those NCAA fellows sure are some genuine folks.
Funny that it makes no mention that the sanctions were reduced not too long after the Paternos were given standing in their suit against the NCAA.
He said:
More like 1,2,4 & 5 are all known cheaters with sanctions to prove it.
I didn't move the goalposts at all. Reading comprehension is your friend.
At least have an honest discussion. To deny there were sanctions, even if undeserved, is to deny reality.
Again, that is from the PSU football wiki article. If you so strongly disagree then you are welcome to edit the text.
I'm not a Pitt fan or trying to make money off it.
If I were I'd stick with the synopsis though.
Not one person ever said that PSU wasn't sanctioned. Reading comprehension is your friend. Obviously PSU was unjustly sanctioned, which is why they were quickly dropped. The sanctions were a rush to judgement that were not based on anyone at PSU breaking any rule.
Even if true, which it is not, how was that cheating? I hope you use a solid source such as Wikipedia! Records will show that Joe did exactly what he was supposed to do, and was praised by the attorney general.
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/11/paterno_praised_for_acting_app.html
ncca.org shows no sanctions under Penn State in its database. Even while being sanctioned, nothing appeared in the database.
cool, guess those sanctions never happened since they aren't in the database.
If you want to say, like JDK, that anyone that has any success in CFB other than Joe does it by cheating, go right ahead.
There have been many great coaches in the sport, something I'm willing to recognize and respect. I don't have to say they cheated to obtain that success to make myself feel better. Even if I don't really care for them as individuals.
To each his own.
