Or head butting a ball...I have a better idea: No one gets paid for kicking a ball.
Or head butting a ball...I have a better idea: No one gets paid for kicking a ball.
And most of the countries don’t give a rat’s ass about their women’s team. In the US, we do...so instead of crying about non-equal pay, maybe the politicians should be pushing other countries to pay attention to their women’s teams, increase interest, increase attendance, thereby generating more revenue which results in more pay.The Men's U19 would beat every Women's World Cup Team. Period. The 34th ranked Thailand Women's Team lost 13-0 to the US...the Men's 34th ranked Serbia Team lost to Brazil 2-0 , tied Romania 2-2 and beat Lithuania 1-0 in the 2018 Men's WC. The competition levels are just very different. This is not to take anything away from the women because they are incredibly talented ..gifted and the best in the World ! But...to try and compare the men vs the women is just...more political grandstanding .
Why?Resounding “No”, and I’m about as big of a USWNT fan as you’ll find.
So the Division 3 college football champion should bring in more money than Pitt just because they win? How about the AAA baseball champion? Should they get paid more than the last place MLB team just because they win?The women's team should be paid more. They're champions with name recognition. The men's team is about as relevant as Pitt football.
CPreally? why do we have 2 teams? Why not have 1 team, and everyone tries out the same, and therefore will get paid the same.
Pandering. Fairness is not the same thing as equality. Sometimes equality is not fair. I'd rather be treated fairly in all things than equally. Equality is communist.
For the same reasons that I don't think Geno Auriemma should be paid the same as Coach K or Calipari, or that a top male model should automatically be paid the same as his female model counterpart.Why?
I blame the TV viewers, attendees, sponsors and merchandisers for lavishing disproportionate attention and dollars on the men's tournament. They should all have to pay an equal amount into the women's tournament, and then everything would be copacetic.
So the Division 3 college football champion should bring in more money than Pitt just because they win? How about the AAA baseball champion? Should they get paid more than the last place MLB team just because they win?
I think this is basically right, although I’m not sure I’d say what the men make should have no bearing on what the women make. Equal is likely unrealistic but equitable should be the goal. While the disparity is disappointing, sports is the entertainment biz. So while I absolutely believe that equal work deserves equal pay (like men and women in the workplace), work isn’t just individual effort. It’s also value created. And entertainment value relates to viewer interest and revenues generated. It’s a shame but those aren’t equal here.For the same reasons that I don't think Geno Auriemma should be paid the same as Coach K or Calipari, or that a top male model should automatically be paid the same as his female model counterpart.
Comparing men's and women's soccer is apples and oranges. We already support women's soccer better than any other country in the world (and unfortunately, you can still count on two hands the number of countries that really care about women's soccer).
What the US men's players get in terms of $ should have no bearing whatsoever on what the US women make, just as what the US Women's full national team makes should have no bearing on what our US Women's futsal team makes.
(I'm assuming your question of "why" was on the salary questions, and not asking why I'm a fan of women's soccer)
Meanwhile a major opioid epidemic is tearing right through his state!!It is so God damned sad a US Senator is pandering to the electorate in this fashion. It’s such an inconsequential issue. If this all he has to do than I can’t think of any reason the people of West Virginia need him representing them.
It is the right argument because it’s based on revenue generated. AAA baseball doesn’t generate the same revenue that the MLB does, so the best team in AAA is not going to get paid what the last place team in MLB earns because MLB brings in so much more money.Are they funded by the same entity? That is the case here as far as I know - the US Soccer Federation. Comparing different athletic levels of the same sport from completely different institutions I sn’t the right argument. If the USWNT is ‘paid’ less by the US Soccer Federation, that would be like women’s soccer players getting a scholarship of a lower value than men’s soccer players at the same school.
Good article here:
https://www.freep.com/story/money/b.../09/womens-soccer-uswnt-equal-pay/1676477001/
And what problem would that be?Let's address the wider problem of gender inequity and forget about soccer.
https://babylonbee.com/news/church-...ey-dont-make-as-much-as-the-new-york-yankees?Should WNBA players also make what NBA players make? What about pro softball, maybe some of them should make what Bryce Harper makes?
It is the right argument because it’s based on revenue generated. AAA baseball doesn’t generate the same revenue that the MLB does, so the best team in AAA is not going to get paid what the last place team in MLB earns because MLB brings in so much more money.
And the men don’t win because they’re playing against countries who’s whole existence has forever been tied up in soccer. The women are playing against countries where women don’t even get many opportunities to play soccer (or any sport). It would be like the US men’s ski team competing against Austria and the women’s team competing against Namibia, and then saying the women are better because they win.Government pandering such as those examples listed here will all wash away with the next news cycle. Gutless lowlifes, the lot of them. None of it will matter to Washington next week.
As for the argument, women and men should absolutely be paid the same salary for the same job. The real debate then should be whether men’s soccer is the same job as women’s soccer. Fans may say they are the same, but actual revenue suggests that they are not.
I think this is basically right, although I’m not sure I’d say what the men make should have no bearing on what the women make. Equal is likely unrealistic but equitable should be the goal. While the disparity is disappointing, sports is the entertainment biz. So while I absolutely believe that equal work deserves equal pay (like men and women in the workplace), work isn’t just individual effort. It’s also value created. And entertainment value relates to viewer interest and revenues generated. It’s a shame but those aren’t equal here.
I love us women’s soccer and I’m thrilled about the successes, opportunities, etc. But in sports, the peak performers in the top leagues and the biggest interest-generators tend to be the most valuable. If women could compete in the top league and generate the same interest and revenues, they should receive equal pay to their male counterparts — just like Danica Patrick.
Edit: I also think US Soccer should pay members of the women’s team the same as the US men’s team, at least as a base if government dollars are used. From there, revenues have to rule. And while there’s a huge disparity in pay and it feels unfair, it’s interesting that women receive a higher % revenue. Seems there’s at least some equitable component.
These are the National teams not for profit professional teams.Should we do that with every sport? Women’s pro hockey players should make the same as NHL players? Lingerie football players get NFL salaries? NBA combine the revenue stream with WNBA and pay them all the same?
And most of the countries don’t give a rat’s ass about their women’s team. In the US, we do...so instead of crying about non-equal pay, maybe the politicians should be pushing other countries to pay attention to their women’s teams, increase interest, increase attendance, thereby generating more revenue which results in more pay.
Women should not be playing sports. They should be in the kitchen, baking cookies and getting a beer out of the fridge for the man in their lives.
Why not 58 teams? One for each "gender" as currently defined by progressives.
The obvious answer is OF COURSE they should and currently, the men are getting less than the women.
While the women players in the World cup get 13% of revenues, the men only get 9%.
Of course, the men's WC generates $400M in revenues, while the women's generates $33M. I'm so sick of the ridiculous pay disparity nonsense that is continually pushed despite being debunked over and over. These women better be careful b/c there is a serious chance that they get a pay decrease if they get their way.
For the same reasons that I don't think Geno Auriemma should be paid the same as Coach K or Calipari, or that a top male model should automatically be paid the same as his female model counterpart.
Comparing men's and women's soccer is apples and oranges. We already support women's soccer better than any other country in the world (and unfortunately, you can still count on two hands the number of countries that really care about women's soccer).
What the US men's players get in terms of $ should have no bearing whatsoever on what the US women make, just as what the US Women's full national team makes should have no bearing on what our US Women's futsal team makes.
(I'm assuming your question of "why" was on the salary questions, and not asking why I'm a fan of women's soccer)
No. In fact, the men should be paid more in order to attract young athletes to the sport. Nowadays boys dream of fame and fortune while playing football, basketball, or baseball. Maybe if they think they can get rich playing soccer they'll play that instead.
Yeah, I know. I'm a horrible person. Don't care.
I think the women deserve a lot more ......
What have the men's team ever accomplished against other men's teams in the long hall.
The women have been more competitive so they deserve more pay.
Nonetheless, the numbers are what they are. The men’s team generates a ton more revenue.The women's team should be paid more. They're champions with name recognition. The men's team is about as relevant as Pitt football.
I have a better idea: No one gets paid for kicking a ball.