Harmon knows a great deal more than he as admitted to under oath IMO. Perhaps that is because The Commonwealth has kept him under its guard all shield. Without trials, I doubt we ever get close to the facts.
Ray Blehar on Curley & Schultz plea deals
- Thread starter ChiTownLion
- Start date
As we all know the standard for a conviction in criminal court is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Of course, that does not apply to cases in The Commonwealth where other interests take priority. We have seen judges make some pretty incredible decisions in the course of trials and this is not an "excited utterance." How these decisions stand is "known only to God." Kane opened Pandora's Box and gave us a glimpse of the underbelly of justice in Pa. Prosecutors and judges are very cozy. While she may have issues, one must still be hysterical that grand jury leaks brought any concern with anyone in the great state of Pa.
Curley and Schultz beat the Felony charges, they would not go away unscathed. Not in the totalitarian courts of The Commonwealth Syndicate.
"... I won't be a bit surprised if they blame the dead guy."
Then who are 'they'?
Of course I would have...just like I rushed to tell everyone about Erickson's notebook when I got it in November 2012....
....truth be told, I had so many checks to cash that I didn't have enough time to mention the notebook!
One of the reasons was that the mother of the second kid (BK) wouldn't allow him to testify.
As more evidence comes available, views change.
Once Sandusky's PCRA was released, that was the final nail in the coffin for AM being the real Victim 2 -- it confirmed that he fabricated much of his November 9, 2011 interview with Amendola's investigators. Those are the facts - for people willing to accept them.
It is a fact I distanced myself from John in 2014 when he was convinced Jerry was telling the truth, never lies, and is completely innocent. I put that out on a blog. However, the truth is that John wasn't a pariah of the PSU community at the point we severed ties. For the record, I don't have an ax to grind with John and am quite pleased to see that he has gotten some gigs writing for LawNewz and Mediaite.
Next, I don't think I've ever used the term "overcharged." My take is that the charges were correct based on the allegations made by the victims -- but that some victims exaggerated what happened to them (and some downplayed things). Qualified investigators would have written a different AOPC for the arrest of Sandsuky -- likely omitting some of the charges and discounting at least one witness completely.
At the outset, when the media was leading us to believe Fisher was an unreliable witness, John and I had serious doubts about whether Sandusky was a "penetrating" pedophile. The stories of Victims, 4, 9, and 10 had problems --- and still do. However, the fact that Sandusky admitted to blowing raspberries (while he was really blowing something else) and other evidence convinced me that he was committing acts of oral sex and vice versa. As for Fisher, the Moulton Report revealed that the delays in the case were not related to Fisher being unreliable. Rather, they were because NO INVESTIGATION was going on.
It is an oversimplification to believe that the only way to clear PSU is for a sexual/indecent assault to not have occurred in 2001 (or for Sandusky to be innocent). I have been consistent since July 2012 that PSU was/is being scapegoated for the failures of the Child Protection System in 1998 and in 2001. In other words, PSU appropriately reported both incidents. That is a lot easier argument to prove than that Jerry is innocent or that Jerry showering naked with a kid alone in a vacant campus building is okay.
notpsu.blogspot.com: I am not the originator of the name nor do I "own" the blog. It is my understanding the name originated because the blog owner, Barry Bozeman, is a University of Tennessee graduate and wanted to make it clear to readers he wasn't writing about the scandal from a biased perspective. In his bio, he stated that he had no love for Paterno or PSU when the scandal broke.
Defend A Child is a child protection organization. Go to their web-site. Logic dictates that a child protection organization is going to dislike/hate pedophiles. That this group supports me is because I am an advocate improving the child protection system.
Last edited:
Harmon testified at the grand jury, December 2011 prelim, and July 2013 prelim that he was not informed about 2001. When asked why he sent an email to Schultz on 12 Feb 2001 stating that he located the 1998 police report, he responded that he couldn't recall Schultz asking for the file or that he ever gave it to Schultz.
He also couldn't remember the takeover of the HUB during a riot in April 2001.
He was not a good witness then -- and won't be if he testifies at the upcoming trial.
Hello, you seem to be new here.
In fact, there is a twitter account called "Defend a Child" that is always liking/retweeting Ray.
Most on Twitter and here know who/what this account/organization is.
If you don't know what org DefendAChild is, you should probably ask Matt Sandusky to explain it to you. They partner org fairly often... In fact, if you are "perusing" twitter, (maybe that is a new place for you as well?) Defend has a link to their website for you to satisfy your curiosity... How you tell if a Twitter account is legit? The quality, not the quantity of who follows them.
Does my account RTing both of them frequently mean anything? Maybe...
He seems to know a lot more than most, certainly more than me. There seems to be a black hole floating around this whole case, sucking the light right out of it. Lynne A., nothing, Barron didn't even get started, C/S beat down, A9? guess the same. Spanier ?
When Ray finds out what the black hole is, he'll probably clam up, too
When Ray finds out what the black hole is, he'll probably clam up, too
We have to wonder whether Gricar ever even met with BK or his mother. You'd think he'd want to try to change her mind if he was really interested in pursuing the case...
There were people that did know they were coming ( hint, Curley, Schultz, OAG, and the judge knew).
More people than that knew.
I can think of at least five more...one of them was Frank Sheeran.
Last edited:
I find it quite amusing when people talk about what they know about what information I possess and/or what/who I have access to.
I am the only one who knows that and I don't make disclosures about it.
If you pay close attention, you can figure out what the "black hole" is. Others have.
Sure , because it looks bad if say lubrano slipped your Erickson's notes.
So give us a prediction , what will they say in regards to Mike? 98? What did they tell Joe?
What did he tell them ? Harmon, 98 and 01?
It's a lot easier to write a blog postulating why after the fact, give us your call here and now .
What will these men testify to?
I am sure he spoke with the mother. Not sure if he talked with BK.
I don't have any information about whether he attempted to change her mind.
For the record, BK & his mother lived in Nittany Gardens, which was/is owned by Bruce Heim.
If you remember, Ganim wrote that the mother did not know what her son said to the police because she wasn't present at the interview and didn't ask him about it. I don't find Ganim's report to be credible in the least.
I didn't even know Lubrano at the time I received the notes. I first met him at Franco's Town Hall in November 2012 -- and I had the notes before I spoke at that event. I probably had them in mid-late October 2012 and I could figure that date exactly from records.
For the record, I publicly disclosed their existence on May 22, 2015.
That goes to the point that this isn't about me or making a name for myself -- or to see how much traffic I can get to a blog. I don't get paid for this and do it in my free time -- at night after I get home from work or on my days off.
Right now, I've taken the morning off of work but will go in later and work until about 7PM tonight. Most days, I work 7AM to 7PM with hour long commutes to and from. That doesn't leave a lot of time for this kind of stuff. BTW, I love to hunt and fish and make sure I take time to do both.
So, as you can see I have a complete life outside of this stuff and I really don't NEED to do this for any kind of fulfillment. I do it because I want to know what the truth is and also want the public to know that the child protection system in PA is abysmal and needs to be fixed.
I do something entirely different in my day job, but it is analytic work.
I'm an analyst -- not a prognosticator.
There are things Curley and Schultz are likely to say, but predicting exactly what they will testify to is nothing more than speculation. The best news about this flip is that it puts Schultz's and Curley's grand jury testimony back in play.
Last edited:
Not exactly what a truth seeker would do...
This link from of all places Zig, lists any number of serious issues with credibility. http://www.framingpaterno.com/email...he-believes-regarding-victim-2-jerry-sandusky
Notably, you actually were cashing checks at that time, according to Zig. And haven't come clean on that until now.
Last edited:
I'm sorry, but I have a hard time believing Matt Sandusky is credible. Its not just Ziegler who doubts him. Elieen Morgan wrote an article a few years back that Ray Blehar posted on his website.
http://notpsu.blogspot.com/2013/08/eileen-morgan-sandusky-vs-sandusky.html
If anything has changed in 4 years that has made Matt Sandusky more likely to be telling the truth, I would be happy to hear it. I know he started a charity, but saying Matt Sandusky must be for real because he started Peaceful Hearts is the same logic as saying Jerry Sandusky can't be a pedophile cause he started the Second Mile.
Thanks for the response Ray.
How exactly did the PCRA confirm that Myers interview with Amendola was made up? Also, if Myers is not victim 2, i wouldn't think it would be horribly difficult to determine who was. Jim Clemente states that Jerry's m.o. was to gradually groom these boys for many years, before engaging with them sexually. This would have required much one-on-one time between Sandusky and Victim 2. The list of boys who were spending that much time with Jerry circa (2000-2002) could not have been a long one, and had to have been known to people closest to Jerry. Of course I will give you credit in that I am absolutely sure Raykowitz and Heim know exactly who the real Victim 2 is. Nobody seems to be talking about that.
You go get him...actually..wait...I'm joking. Please don't go and get him. Listen to me...all of your voices in your head need to listen to me. Leave him alone or just stick to insulting him online.
This is another example of Ray not exactly being a truth seeker. Because he does claim to know who "the real" V2 is. But he won't say, while railing against everyone else in this mess who keeps secrets.
He's in this to write a book. And Tim & Gary just burned up his premise. If there was ever a time to lay all the cards out on the table, it's right now. Since he won't, you can be sure it's all hogwash.
If you are saying you and Ray are the same person that would make a lot of sense. It would be the first time you've ever made any sense. Go steal some more Fetty Wap beats.
I no longer believe much of anything anyone says from either side about this whole mess. Yep, JZ and Ray engage in a large amount of speculation and connecting the dots. That said, so did the OAG, Louis Freeh, the media and countless others. So my question to you, a rational poster, is how is what Ray, in particular, is doing any different? Also, if he were to write a book, he's not going to make any money on it. Other than the PSU community no one cares anymore.
Last edited:
To be fair there's no legitimate reason to name a victim publicly unless you're scum like Ziegler.
If he does know who victim 2 is keeping it a secret is the right thing to do. It should be up to the victims if they want to go public.
Then he's doing the right thing for the wrong reasons.
It certainly could be worse.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
Podcast Jerquaden Guilford Decommits + Top Targets To Replace Him- Latest: NittanyNation51
-
