The way Warner looked against Michigan makes me think he's feeling better and he's "back" If he is, nobody in the B1G can beat him but Max IMO.
A mere 20 years ago, Scott Moore went 54-9 for the season. Wild!All true but for a guy like him to only have 10 matches, it just seems off a little.
Michigan's 197 is 5-11, career 12-19, and would be sitting if the Woodley transfer hadn't fallen thru.The way Warner looked against Michigan makes me think he's feeling better and he's "back" If he is, nobody in the B1G can beat him but Max IMO.
Logically or not, I'd much rather watch Starocci get another shot at Nelson than have a marginally better chance at bonus in his quarterfinal match.Logically, we shouldn't want that. Nelson is going to get beat either by Labriola or Smith, give Carter an easier to bonus guy.
My comment was a general one. These criteria could be split, but that does not appear to be an option.To clarify, Brooks won't split Common Opponents 5-5 with Keckeisen and Munoz. Both beat Coleman, and their losses were to opponents Brooks did not face. Brooks will lose that category 10-0 to them.
Brooks should score 10-0 or 5-5 against the other 30 qualifiers in the seeding sim.
Despite Warner looking like wrestling this year is a drudgery and snapping Terry in two would be his only moment of joy, he still has the talent to be the biggest obstacle between Max and title number 2. However, I am not sure beating up on a Michigan backup is indicative his competitive passion has returned. If Tom looks at him and says go ahead and give Terry a toss or two, maybe fun and joy can be restored for the kid.The way Warner looked against Michigan makes me think he's feeling better and he's "back" If he is, nobody in the B1G can beat him but Max IMO.
I believe that the criteria are used to determine pre-seeds. Final seeds are after coaches' approval.Appreciate @RoarLions1 @El-Jefe @Fink for doing the math on this stuff.
@El-Jefe you’re right the seeding doesn’t matter much for a guy like Brooks as he’s by far the best guy in the weight. Was curious if there was any “common sense/past accomplishment” type factor. Appreciate you breaking it down
I don't think in anything official. Places like Intermat or flow can rank however they want.Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but doesn't Brooks' win over Keckeisen at the NWCA count toward seeding at Nationals? That is the impression I was under, it did not count toward record, but did count in the seeding criteria for Nationals.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but doesn't Brooks' win over Keckeisen at the NWCA count toward seeding at Nationals? That is the impression I was under, it did not count toward record, but did count in the seeding criteria for Nationals.
It was an exhibition.Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but doesn't Brooks' win over Keckeisen at the NWCA count toward seeding at Nationals? That is the impression I was under, it did not count toward record, but did count in the seeding criteria for Nationals.
Usually the Monday prior to the tournament. Should be Feb 27.Great job as always. When fo the pre-seeds for Bigs come out?
Thanks. Love this time of year. Jacked to get the post season rolling.Usually the Monday prior to the tournament. Should be Feb 27.