Sandusky Scandal Costs Approach 1/4 Billion.
- Thread starter moofafoo
- Start date
Umm. Too easy. Penn State has the right to request that. The school hasn't done so.
You're so full of shit. He said he was going to do it, he doesn't have to be asked.
All the turd has to do is schedule dates and times. Don't hold your breath, except from his ass stink and gmj & covey.
He promised to address those questions for the "entire Penn State community"
Many members and factions of the "Penn State community" have most certainly extended that invitation and made that request............
You douchebag
His contract is not with those people, like it or not.
Why not take it up with the A9?
Thought we were talking about Louis Freeh's integrity
Next time - lets spell things out ahead of time
Wouldn't want you to continue to get "confused" wrt the topic at hand
Jizzbag
Thought we were talking about Louis Freeh's integrity
Next time - lets spell things out ahead of time
Wouldn't want you to continue to get "confused" wrt the topic at hand
Jizzbag
Again. Why not take that up with the A9? They've been reviewing the Freehsource materials. Since they got access they voted unanimously for Lubert as board president.
Why not direct your frustration at them?
Why don't you take your Penn Live turds back there?
You don't even make any sense. Ask the right questions of the right people. Put pressure on the A9 and the rest of the BoT to fix things.
Um, it was in the terms of his contract. Do you think it's OK to ignore terms of a contract you were paid handsomely for?
Of course maybe an ass like you would hire a guy to build a house only to have him tell you he won't install the windows and doors because you didn't expressly invite him.
And as far as the question about why Dead-Eye Louie didn't investigate TSM, we all know that. He was hired by the BOT to justify why they fired Paterno and Spanier. You know the BOT, those captains of industry ready to lead any crisis who were running around like chickens with their heads cut off, clueless on hos to handle a few questions from an ESPN sideline reporter.
Freeh doesn't care about victims, and neither do Surma, Peetz, Masser, Suhey, Meyers, Frazier, Dambly, Deviney, Eckel, Lubert, Dandrea, Riley (hell she "dated" a pedophile for years, how did she "not know?"), Coppersmith, Joyner, Garban, Huck, Hintz, Huber, Harpster, and the rest as they used to say on the Gilligan's Island theme song.
Already did Pitter, and all you have is PL bulllshit.
Go ask Corbutt, Fina, The Man of Steal Surma and the rest of your shit eating Jacobs heroes.
WRONG. I suggest you re-watch that PC and read his other quotes on the matter. It was not in his mandate, so he ignored it, and even went so far as to EXCLUDE any evidentiary documents referring to TSM from the report. Scroll back and see if you can find it.
LOL! "Defending Freeh" You really are a piece of work. If it weren't so sad, it would be hilarious. Twist and Shout all you want, there is no way anyone could possibly derive that.
You STOOPID dipshit
Not only was that not the issue at hand.......
But, if it where, the truth is that "calling in Louis Freeh" is one of the VERY FEW things that the A9 has spoken up about
Maybe you missed Bob Jubelirer's "Nikita Khrushchez" moment at the BOT meeting (among others)?
Then again, I suppose this is just one of many, many, MANY things that an inquisitive individual like you misses.
Now, go crawl back up your sphincter........or the sphincter of one of your colleagues - I don't care.......
until you can re-emerge - led by your feces covered snout - to enlighten us with some other bit of C-J wisdom.
You can't have it both ways. You wanted him to investigate beyond what his contract called for. That's dumb. Then you say he's BOTH incompetent & biased. Why in the world would you want someone like that to investigate.
In the end, it doesn't matter. The actual reason that police weren't notified has everything to do with the SexFaire/pedophilia scandal that was already inflaming the campus and the state. I'm sure Freeh's raw materials show that. And I'm sure this is why everyone who's looked at the raw materials has clammed up & moved on.
They will never see the light of day because their more damning to everyone than what even Freeh reported. But you'd have to have done actual research to know about that.
I've already explained why this is illogical and makes no sense. Please pay attention.
Really, go jerk off into the toilet you bought from the drunken ass Bonasorte.
I replied directly to you. Pay attention and you might learn something. Finding it would be a better use of your time than continuing to post. Good luck!
There is at least partial corroboration of McQueary's story, from Schultz. It is in the transcript read at the same hearing. He had indicated that he thought it was some kind of contact, i.e. that Sandusky grabbed the boy's genitals. It was something beyond "horseplay."
It is on pages 211-12 of the transcript, if you want to check.
First, PSU was not paying Freeh to investgate TSM. Second, even if they had been, Penn State has no authority over TSM and Freeh had no governmental authority to investigate. The OAG had begun to, but Kane apparently did not follow through after having the case for three and a half years.
So you're saying that while Freeh and the BOT and the OAG are all beating their breasts about protecting and saving the kids, all of them believe that even though the trail of Sandusky's crimes leads down the yellow brick road, in no way is Freeh to venture beyond the borders of Munchkinland.
Why are you fretting about Freeh's authority? After all, isn't he called Judge? Wasn't he the most powerful law enforcement officer in the world? If he really wanted to protect kids, and he saw where the trail was leading, he couldn't make some phone calls to get some of his other LE friends involved?
Or are what you really saying is that Freeh and the BOT did the least they were contractually required to do, and morally we shouldn't expect them to do more? Kind of sucks for you to believe that while expecting more from others.
Why are you fretting about Freeh's authority? After all, isn't he called Judge? Wasn't he the most powerful law enforcement officer in the world? If he really wanted to protect kids, and he saw where the trail was leading, he couldn't make some phone calls to get some of his other LE friends involved?
Or are what you really saying is that Freeh and the BOT did the least they were contractually required to do, and morally we shouldn't expect them to do more? Kind of sucks for you to believe that while expecting more from others.
I guess I'm not saying that. Its not clear that Freeh, BoT, or OAG felt TSM was anything but a charity. The criminal was Jerry. Nothing has come out or even hinted at anything else.
I think YOU need to read the transcript. He didn't say what he thought it was. He was responding to a line of prodding questioning from the state speculating on what possibly could have happened that night to prompt MM to report it. He didn't say "I think there was ball grabbing going on"
YAWN.
Here's a challenge. You write a LTE arguing your points under your real name.
Otherwise - you're just another anonymous dude pecking away on a message board with an agenda.
Here's a challenge. You write a LTE arguing your points under your real name.
Otherwise - you're just another anonymous dude pecking away on a message board with an agenda.
Last edited:
Another challenge. Stop embarrassing Penn State by writing LTEs until you are better informed or at least less biased.
While you're at it, stop meeting with AGs and pretending you speak for the Alum community at large.
After say a year of that peaceful and rational silence, I'll happily write an LTE.
Confucius say, "he who ignores an asshole can still smell its farts"
Are you claiming you don't have an agenda? It's obvious you do but the problem
seems to be that you aren't sure of what it consists. Get Mulder and Scully on the case.
I must have touched a nerve.
You couldn't even answer what you mean by "entire leadership." Wensilver, you consistently, and publicly, supported Kane, and for 3 1/2 years, Kane did nothing to investigate TSM. Fina began the work, but Kane dropped the ball. Kane even complained about using a grand jury.
Unrelated, Kane did pretty much the same thing with the Altoona-Johnstown Diocese case.
We now have to ask why Wendy Silverwood supported someone who stonewalled on the TSM investigation.
Silverwood, stooge of Sandusky or simply stupid?
Perhhaps that could be the subject of an LTE?
Lawyers trolling for payouts and fat fees (usually over 40% of any settlement awards). If MSU hangs tough, the plaintiff lawyers will give up. because they are financing the tort expenses themselves. BTW, the Sandusky expenses are gross charges; PSU expects to recover almost all the monies from their insurers (and probably will, all except the NCAA fine which was changed by PA legislature to go only to PA entities).
Honest to God.....
Crawl back into your Crimson hole.....
You know NOTHING.....
Absolutely NOTHING .....
About the situation at hand.....
ZERO
I must have touched a nerve.
Wensilver, you consistently, and publicly, supported Kane, and for 3 1/2 years, Kane did nothing to investigate TSM. Fina began the work, but Kane dropped the ball. Kane even complained about using a grand jury.
Unrelated, Kane did pretty much the same thing with the Altoona-Johnstown Diocese case.
We now have to ask why Wendy Silverwood supported someone who stonewalled on the TSM investigation.
Silverwood, stooge of Sandusky or simply stupid?
Perhhaps that could be the subject of an LTE?
She asked a dumb question at the Freeh press conference. Spent the last 5 years endlessly harping on Lynne Abraham in hopes that if something one day is foundcat TSM, her presser gaffe will be forgotton.
Then she backed Kane. To the end. No matter what. Finally hosting a pep rally in Harrisburg for Kane's other 6 supporters.
If I see another LTE from this loon I will scream
