ADVERTISEMENT

Saquon is about to make history

If two others have already done it..... are you “making history”?
In all the HISTORY of the NFL, he would be one if only three to do it. Historically, he would be the third. He would be the first Giant, the first Lion, the first what ever. That is history. LOL and tongue in cheek. It’s a pretty big deal.
 
I don’t know, when someone gets 3,000 hits they’re said to have made history even though others have done it...or 500 home runs. How about if a pitcher gets 500 wins, would that be making history even though Cy Young did it?
Or whoever said that the accomplishment made history was wrong. I set high school records but I hardly made history (just semantics, really).
 
Last edited:
Can the OP please change sAquon's name in the subject title? Thanks.

Also, imagine if Saquon tops 2,000 yards and somehow loses out on Rookie of the Year.
 
Can the OP please change sAquon's name in the subject title? Thanks.

Also, imagine if Saquon tops 2,000 yards and somehow loses out on Rookie of the Year.
Pretty amazing that Barkley seems to be the only guy not allowed to have a couple of bad games. Maybe expectations are just too high. Mayfield has had his share of bad games, but they seem to get forgotten about, but not Barkley. A bad game or two and he drops down on the award list.
 
He deserves ROY no doubt. Some people seem to forget he's running behind a horrid OL and there is nothing he can do when the D is focusing 100% on him.
He would have broke every rookie record if he played for the Rams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NedFromYork
He deserves ROY no doubt. Some people seem to forget he's running behind a horrid OL and there is nothing he can do when the D is focusing 100% on him.
He would have broke every rookie record if he played for the Rams.
It shouldn’t even be close. Mayfield isn’t in the top 10 in any category for QB....he is 11th for INT’s but only 18th in attempts....so he’s throwing a high percentage of picks. Barkley is in the top 5 for every meaningful category and top 3 for some....and he hasn’t fumbled once. It’s a joke for anyone to even consider Mayfield over Barkley.
 
I’d vote for Barkley.

But if someone where looking to justify a vote for Mayfield, it wouldn’t be hard.

One could argue (and I’d agree):
Without Mayfield the Browns win 2 games - instead of 7 or 8.
Without Barkley, the crappy Giants are far less entertaining to watch, but probably win 3 or 4 crappy games instead of 5 crappy games.


The real shame is that - at least IMO - the Browns woulda’ coulda’ shoulda’ had BOTH Mayfield and Barkley.
How in the world would the Giants have won 3 or 4 without him? My guess is they would have won maybe one. He’s been almost their entire offense all year. He has had two down games the last two weeks and they’ve lost them both. Without him they would have those results every week. I’ve watched every game they’ve played this year and without him they’re easily the worst team in the NFL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bison13
geez...I try to stay out of this stuff, but is feigning politeness the same as being polite?
Is it even polite to feign politeness?

For some reason I am thinking of Eddie on Leave It to Beaver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JJTopp99
I don't even like Mayfield, but he has taken a winless team to possibly ending the season with a winning record. Since week 7, he has the 5th highest QB rating in the league, and is two TD passes short of tying the season record for rookies. If he beats Baltimore on the road and knocks them out of the playoffs it's probably a slam dunk.

This is how the media will look at the voting. The QB position wins all the awards, look at the Heisman last year. Saquon wasn't even invited to the ceremony. Ten of the last 11 MVP's have been QB's. It sucks but that's the way it works these days.
 
Oh if only women thought that way.
Barkley has made history, sets records for receptions by a running back with his 89th, breaks Reggie Bush record. Only 0ne of three RB's with over 2000 yards from scrimmage. Dickerson and I believe Edgerin James the other two.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT