ADVERTISEMENT

Scaramucci quotes Joe Pa

Here's what they're saying on twitter.

https://twitter.com/search?q=@scaramucci+Paterno

DFwLokEUAAAVSsm.jpg
 
Last edited:

I am no fan of the Trump administration, but I have no problem with Scaramucci making a positive reference to Joe Paterno and I didn't have any problem with the Donald giving a shout out to Joe at a campaign rally in Pittsburgh. It makes you wonder if they may think (or know) that things at Penn State may not have happened according to the popular narratives spread by the OAG and the media.
 
I am no fan of the Trump administration, but I have no problem with Scaramucci making a positive reference to Joe Paterno and I didn't have any problem with the Donald giving a shout out to Joe at a campaign rally in Pittsburgh. It makes you wonder if they may think (or know) that things at Penn State may not have happened according to the popular narratives spread by the OAG and the media.
Trump tweeted about it many times after the whole thing broke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
I think it is about time we re-look at the cover up!!
The same people that are easily lead to conclusions about Russia are the same that were easily lead to conclusions on Paterno. No surprise. The media feeds low information shiny object followers their agenda and there is no critical thinking there to do anything except nod and parrot.
 
I am no fan of the Trump administration, but I have no problem with Scaramucci making a positive reference to Joe Paterno and I didn't have any problem with the Donald giving a shout out to Joe at a campaign rally in Pittsburgh. It makes you wonder if they may think (or know) that things at Penn State may not have happened according to the popular narratives spread by the OAG and the media.
No. They don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMS1950
The same people that are easily lead to conclusions about Russia are the same that were easily lead to conclusions on Paterno. No surprise. The media feeds low information shiny object followers their agenda and there is no critical thinking there to do anything except nod and parrot.

Nah, one there is proof and the other there is none.
 
The same people that are easily lead to conclusions about Russia are the same that were easily lead to conclusions on Paterno. No surprise. The media feeds low information shiny object followers their agenda and there is no critical thinking there to do anything except nod and parrot.

AND we have the "leader" that knows how to hire even dumber people than he is. Makes him look smart :) Sort of like a fat person hanging out with even fatter people to look thin !!!!!!
 
Last edited:
AND we have the "leader" that knows how to higher even dumber people than he is. Makes him look smart :) Sort of like a fat person hanging out with even fatter people to look thin !!!!!!


Not a good practice to use the wrong homonym when discussing someone else' s lack of intelligence. The correct word is "hire," not "higher."
 
Wow, that Jan Shay is a piece of work on twitter.

She demands evidence that Joe did not condone rape of children in the face of evidence that he did. Granted she doesn't provide any evidence that he did, she just assumes it to be true, and wants us to prove a negative.
 
Really think that this movie isn't going to be the hit piece that so many are expecting. Just from what you hear about Pacino's opinion of Joe and what he thought of him I don't think there was a chance in hell he would take the role unless it was fair in his eyes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: indynittany
You can never lose when your foundation is built on these simple facts.

DFwHAjLWAAMizRH.jpg
Not that I'm looking for any support from the Alt Right, but the terms 'fake news' and 'alternative facts' could have been used in this situation much sooner than the campaign and administration's use. Same old same old, if anyone of authority or influence had spoken relative to the facts and not the hysteria....
 
Last edited:
Really think that this movie isn't going to be the hit piece that so many are expecting. Just from what you here about Pacino's opinion of Joe and what he thought of him I don't think there was a chance in hell he would take the role unless it was fair in his eyes.

I hope you're right. In reality Joe's involvement in the entire Sandusky matter was relatively minor. I doubt they are making an entire movie dedicated to him properly reporting and getting out of the way. So I fear the worst.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206 and bdgan
Not a good practice to use the wrong homonym when discussing someone else' s lack of intelligence. The correct word is "hire," not "higher."

OK :) thanks for the correction. But I am NOT a world "leader"?

Well, to be honest I have always had issues with the English "language". A great deal of it makes NO sense, to, too, two etc. It is such a mess of made up rules. I understand that "irregardless" is now an english word and coming soon - yo, dub, whatup, gooder :) :) SO, maybe higher (hire) will make it ?????

PS, fixed MY error !!!
 
I hope you're right. In reality Joe's involvement in the entire Sandusky matter was relatively minor. I doubt they are making an entire movie dedicated to him properly reporting and getting out of the way. So I fear the worst.

I think you are correct. I do not see this as a good thing.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT