ADVERTISEMENT

Scouting new PSU RB Trey Potts

CaliLION79

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2020
326
708
1


Seems like a serviceable not spectacular player...which is perfect for what we need in a third back. Limited to no upside but possesses a high enough floor that the sky won't fall if he needs to step in for either 10 or 13. Feels like a geographical Goldielocks situation in landing him, since 99 percent of dudes in the portal wouldn't step into a situation in which they have zero chance to up their carries.
 


Seems like a serviceable not spectacular player...which is perfect for what we need in a third back. Limited to no upside but possesses a high enough floor that the sky won't fall if he needs to step in for either 10 or 13. Feels like a geographical Goldielocks situation in landing him, since 99 percent of dudes in the portal wouldn't step into a situation in which they have zero chance to up their carries.

Increase carries? You ignored his injuries.
 
You'll be able to read his thoughts on why he transferred tomorrow.


Just goes to show you how wrong the know-it-all posters on this site are - they routinely claim that they "know" what this kids' decision-criteria are during recruitment (be it a transfer or high school recruit), but they DO NOT. What is important to each individual is subject to that individual and these people don't know what each person's criteria and rational are, no matter what they claim.
 
Just goes to show you how wrong the know-it-all posters on this site are - they routinely claim that they "know" what this kids' decision-criteria are during recruitment (be it a transfer or high school recruit), but they DO NOT. What is important to each individual is subject to that individual and these people don't know what each person's criteria and rational are, no matter what they claim.
But we all will know tomorrow.
 


Seems like a serviceable not spectacular player...which is perfect for what we need in a third back. Limited to no upside but possesses a high enough floor that the sky won't fall if he needs to step in for either 10 or 13. Feels like a geographical Goldielocks situation in landing him, since 99 percent of dudes in the portal wouldn't step into a situation in which they have zero chance to up their carries.

Can you read? Seriously?

Here is the original post. " 99% would not step into a situation in which they have zero chance to up their carries."

Potts has had injuries. Increased carries might be a non issue to a player who has not been durable to increase his carries.
 
Last edited:
"...Toto, we're not in mini-sota anymore..."
wizard of oz GIF
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT