I don't have the full list of who's in the portal but I don't feel comfortable with what we have. It's a position I believe we need to add competition too--RB wasn't
It’s good…it can’t be anything by good. Getting an experienced running back who’s willing to be third string is good regardless of how you want to negatively spin it (as usual). It’s not like anyone’s going to get Saquon Barkley to come be a third stringer.
There's no negative spin. It's not a good or bad addition. It's depth.
Yeah, you're pretty much always cheerleading and being upset by me not pretending his is a big deal proves that.
It's not--you want everyone here to simply celebrate everything we do. You get upset any time anyone doesn't pretend everything is perfect. Read any post you have.
Yea I do and apparently so does Franklin…you know, a guy that knows 100 times more about football than you’ll ever know.
Yes, I forgot coaches are always right. All coaches--no one can ever question their decisions. My bad.
How am I having a conversation with myself when you continue to respond?
I didn’t care what you thought it was just a stupid worthless comment you made - don’t confuse mockery for caring.
If you respond even to mock it means you care. Pretending otherwise is nonsense. Again, the comment was accurate no matter how upset you are by it.
Actually no. It means I am entertaining myself by getting Pavlov’s Dog to respond to every post I make.
You are wrong ass hat. No one in their right mind would be comfortable with Montgomery should 1a and 1b get hurt early. Potts is decent and experienced. Gives PSU depth, experience and time with Montgomery. It is not a meh move. It is a good move. You don't get to create reality because you say so. You are like the crazy ass media who literally creates their own reality.
If given a choice to listen to someone talk about football, I think I would take any coach’s word over yours…they’re all far more qualified than you (except in your fantasy world).
And that’s the problem. Look it’s not at this point in time a significant game changing addition. He was added as depth insurance. Everyone with a semblance of a brain knows it. That’s all you had to say, but intended or not it came across as a dig at the kid. And suddenly you’re upset and whining that people take issue with your poorly worded comment. The bottom line is. If you can’t say something, anything positive about young men when they decide to play football at PSU don’t say anything.
You lost your argument at "decent". Guess we shouldn't have played our current backs last year since they lacked experience. It's a meh move regardless of your spin. And I'm not the one creating my own reality--this board does with many things--starting with their obsession with bowl games.
How is "meh" a ding at the kid. Potts didn't come here to be a star. He knows what his role is.
There you go again acting as if your opinion is fact. You’re entitled to your opinion, but please realize that it is just your opinion.
Yeah given the injuries it might be ideal for him to come to a place and show what he can with 40 or 50 carries and not get worn down.
I didn’t…I said in countless posts that it’s my opinion. You post as if you are the be all and end all of football knowledge.
Saying "my opinion" while acting like others is wrong isn't different than what I do. Just like those that falsely believe they know how a Penn State fan must act to be a fan.
It’s way different than what you do, but I wouldn’t expect a narcissist to see that.
Always being negative doesn’t make you a realist, it makes you an a$$. A realist sees positives and negatives especially with a program like Penn State.
