No doubt many possibilities with the contract yet I think it can be a negative recruiting wise by other teams hammering home "perceived instability".Maybe, maybe not. If we only knew the details behind the one-year contract decision like who wanted it and why. Obviously, it became a mutual agreement. Was the one year driven by Drayton for financial reasons? Or was it a Franklin thing I doubt it. Was it an Agent thing? Does Drayton still want to be a HC somewhere and waiting for that to open up. Many questions and for now no answers.