What are you talking about? No one here knows if it is true or not.
Maybe because some of us hope that others would defend our honor when we're that "dead man" and our lifetime legacy is being slandered without a shred of evidence to support it. I fear that you're of the generation that can't be bothered to care about anything that isn't on your cell phone.
Which is more important, "defending our honor" or doing the right thing. It appears that some at PSU were more concerned about the former in 2001.
I'm not doing it to goad people, I'm doing it to re-enforce the fact that Paterno isn't going to do anything for the University moving forward. He is dead... gone... not coming back. He is not going to help us in any way. So why are we obsessing over him? His legacy is the concern of his family and that it is. Penn State moves on.
30 millionaires now. Only 8 of which OAG saw fit to put on the stand. So if I get 30 people to say you had sex with your mother does that make it true?How many does it take for you? 30 is a lot.
I am inspired by lots of dead people.I'm not doing it to goad people, I'm doing it to re-enforce the fact that Paterno isn't going to do anything for the University moving forward. He is dead... gone... not coming back. He is not going to help us in any way. So why are we obsessing over him? His legacy is the concern of his family and that it is. Penn State moves on.
30 millionaires now. Only 8 of which OAG saw fit to put on the stand. So if I get 30 people to say you had sex with your mother does that make it true?
Didn't Lubrano vote to approve this settlement? Was HE part of the Grand conspuracy? Or did he believe the story and felt the victim deserved compensation? Seems to me that if there is a poster on the board that can add insight into this it's him. What say you, sir?
What makes you think that the trustees were told any of the individual claimants stories?
If I was a steward of University money I would want to make an informed, intelligent, well thought out choice before approving any settlement. That involves a complete abd thorough understanding of whom is getting paid and why. Victims names could be protected, of course, but the facts should be made known before I'd vote. Anything less would be an uninformed vote.