ADVERTISEMENT

Surprise: Paterno story comes from Inquirer....

What are you talking about? No one here knows if it is true or not.


you do know its true

you KNOW that ira and his buddies set this up
if you do not then ..... well I won't call people names like others do on here but I would honestly question the intelligence of a person who thinks that way
 
Maybe because some of us hope that others would defend our honor when we're that "dead man" and our lifetime legacy is being slandered without a shred of evidence to support it. I fear that you're of the generation that can't be bothered to care about anything that isn't on your cell phone.

Which is more important, "defending our honor" or doing the right thing. It appears that some at PSU were more concerned about the former in 2001.
 
I'm not doing it to goad people, I'm doing it to re-enforce the fact that Paterno isn't going to do anything for the University moving forward. He is dead... gone... not coming back. He is not going to help us in any way. So why are we obsessing over him? His legacy is the concern of his family and that it is. Penn State moves on.

I believe some think he is coming back.
 
I'm not doing it to goad people, I'm doing it to re-enforce the fact that Paterno isn't going to do anything for the University moving forward. He is dead... gone... not coming back. He is not going to help us in any way. So why are we obsessing over him? His legacy is the concern of his family and that it is. Penn State moves on.
I am inspired by lots of dead people.
 
Didn't Lubrano vote to approve this settlement? Was HE part of the Grand conspuracy? Or did he believe the story and felt the victim deserved compensation? Seems to me that if there is a poster on the board that can add insight into this it's him. What say you, sir?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Osprey Lion
Didn't Lubrano vote to approve this settlement? Was HE part of the Grand conspuracy? Or did he believe the story and felt the victim deserved compensation? Seems to me that if there is a poster on the board that can add insight into this it's him. What say you, sir?

What makes you think that the trustees were told any of the individual claimants stories?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marshall30
What makes you think that the trustees were told any of the individual claimants stories?

If I was a steward of University money I would want to make an informed, intelligent, well thought out choice before approving any settlement. That involves a complete abd thorough understanding of whom is getting paid and why. Victims names could be protected, of course, but the facts should be made known before I'd vote. Anything less would be an uninformed vote.
 
If I was a steward of University money I would want to make an informed, intelligent, well thought out choice before approving any settlement. That involves a complete abd thorough understanding of whom is getting paid and why. Victims names could be protected, of course, but the facts should be made known before I'd vote. Anything less would be an uninformed vote.

Wait a minute.
Weren't you one of the guys who consistently defended Masser when he was denying alumni-elected trustees access to "confidential" information?

Well, I guess the upside is that you now agree that it was totally wrong for Masser to do that.

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT