We beat 6 teams by 4 or more TDs. We beat a 7th by 19 because we emptied the bench. We beat another only by 10 in spite of 5 turnovers in a monsoon. Purdue was the only close win and they were much more challenging on the road to open the season as they returned more starters than any big 10 team from a 9 win team the previous year and we have relied heavily on freshmen.That may be true but the way the season played out, we were favored in every game. I think our most challenging game was Purdue since it was the first game of the season. Charlie Jones made a big splash and we couldn't anticipate that because he wasn't on the team last year and didn't play much before with Iowa. Auburn had a down year, fired their coach. We didn't play Iowa, Wisconsin or Nebraska. We played Minn after they lost their key starting QB.
So you can say we won 1.5 more games than we should have, a closer look shows that we won the games we should have and lost to the two we should have. We simply "held serve".
We can all call that "improvement" and rightfully so. We didn't lose to an "Indiana" or "Illinois", if that is considered an improvement. My position is that this "improvement" came after two years of dismal performance. I am not going to jump up and down because we beat Purdue and MD in the same year.
![]()
Some of you just want to miserable. Oh, the horror, we didn't beat 2 undefeated teams on top of absolutely dominating the rest of the competition in an 8th to upper third most challenging schedule of all teams. Go root for another team if it's so bad.