FWIW - I don't really have much of an opinion one way or another on the "statue". My hunch - and it is only a hunch, as I have no way of knowing for sure - is that the Paterno family could come up with a list of a dozen ways to honor/commemorate Joe Paterno's tenure that may be more appropriate than a statue. But, as I said, its really not my place to say....and I've got no problems with folks who may have other opinions on the matter, and I do think there are reasonable arguments to be made on all sides of that issue.How about the twelfth of never! Why do bother posting such drivel? There are better ways to honor Joe.
You may not be able to count scholarships but I like this idea!Never. I'm OK with Beaver Stadium but I would like the following:
- A statue of Joe in front of the library.
- A "409" plaque centered between the years on the east side of the stadium.
- An area outside the stadium honoring Joe and the Grand Experiment. It should make mention of graduation rates and list all of the academic All Americans that played for Joe.
I don't disagree with you. The food science building naming was a disgrace. Before naming a stadium after someone, I'd like to know exactly who did what and how everything went down. I believe the record will show joe did nothing wrong. But you know how the news outlets would treat this. Yes screw the media, but I don't want the media implying he covered anything up during the naming celebrations. I'd like him to be cleared once and for all so that we can tell the media to shove it once they start writing bullshit headlines. Say what you want, but the CSS trial will bring a lot of finality to this entire case.So......I would assume that you were - and remain - absolutely APPALLED that the Provost at the time of the "Sandusky Affair" has had his name enshrined on the Creamery Building.....right?
(Even though he did have INCREDIBLE 30 month tenure of outstanding service as the President of the University.)
Or that he was given the Penn State Medal.......right?
Or even that he was given a big fat bonus and an even bigger lifetime pension.....right?
After all....it is certainly quite likely that - as the second in command under Spanier - his name will surface as one of those folks "in the know".....once the trials are held......right?
I must not have been paying attention.....I seem to have missed your expressions of outrage with regard to those actions.
An area outside the stadium honoring Joe and the Grand Experiment. It should make mention of graduation rates and list all of the academic All Americans that played for Joe.
There was only one building Joe wanted his name on that was the library wing he added periodI know there are a few camps on this, but I am in the YES camp for a change NOW! Will this happen any time soon? I doubt it, unless the upcoming trials reveal Joe's complete adherence to required actions in handling the JS situation. I am confident that Joe did what he was required to do by informing those who should have been told, but should (or COULD) he have done more is really the only question in my mind and probably everyone else's. I am also pretty certain that had he truly BELIEVED that JS really did what he was later convicted of, he WOULD have done more including thinking of beating the hell out of JS himself!
But given the manner and circumstances in which the statue was removed, it needs to go back where it was. Putting it in the middle of the campus where few fans will see it on football weekend reeks of compromise. That Joe was only partially responsible for child rape.THIS.^^^^^ His statue in front of the library, rather than his name on the stadium, speaks directly to the kind of man Joe was.
Great post.
Did Joe want his statue removed in a manner that implies he would protect a child rapist to protect his record?There was only one building Joe wanted his name on that was the library wing he added period
I agree.Never. The only University that has the football stadium named after an ex-president and the library named after an ex-football coach...just the way Joe wanted things. I knew Joe somewhat well and I'm certain of this...
And I am in favor of renaming the stadium for the coach and leader of men that MADE Penn State football.
I know there are a few camps on this, but I am in the YES camp for a change NOW! Will this happen any time soon? I doubt it, unless the upcoming trials reveal Joe's complete adherence to required actions in handling the JS situation. I am confident that Joe did what he was required to do by informing those who should have been told, but should (or COULD) he have done more is really the only question in my mind and probably everyone else's. I am also pretty certain that had he truly BELIEVED that JS really did what he was later convicted of, he WOULD have done more including thinking of beating the hell out of JS himself!