Of our remaining targets, Smith is #1 on my board. I think he is going to be a dominant player.
Now that we lost a kicker, I think we all know why our coach recruited a kicker.
Seems like he knew way ahead of time.
You might even say they would get a kick out of it.So long as the kicker is the one who made the decision, of his own accord, it's all good. And it seems that is what happened. If he was squeezed out, we all know that there are several local journalists who would be thrilled to present that story to their readers.
Now that we lost a kicker, I think we all know why our coach recruited a kicker.
Seems like he knew way ahead of time.
OR
We lost a kicker BECAUSE we recruited another kicker.
Well certaintly that is probably true to some extent, but it also shows a coach who puts an emphasis on all 3 phases of the game. In order for one to walk he must have felt he wasn't going to get his chance as apparently the preferred walk ons were higher up the list.OR
We lost a kicker BECAUSE we recruited another kicker.
No.
Nearly impossible to get a BS degree in that time frame, especially for a "student-athlete" (simple math, been discussed here before).
The track that CJF references (and presents to families) is 3 1/2 years - ie A kid completing his degree requirements in the fall of his 4th year (RS Junior or True Senior - guys like Cabinda, Gesicki, and Marcus Allen), and being able to leave at that time to pursue NFL dreams - if the opportunity presents itself - and going on to the "combine/workout circuit" after that fall semester with degree in hand.
Dumb question about the crystal ball accuracy, but don't all of these analysts change crystal ball picks all the time? How in the world are they measured on accuracy when they might put in a CB for 10 different schools during a player's recruitment? All they need to do is get the last one correct once the pick is relatively obvious and they are "accurate?" It just seems like a weird metric to me. If one of them was 18 of 19 on their first CB pick for a recruit then I'd be impressed.Didn't see this posted here yet. We picked up another crystal ball for Tyreke Smith yesterday from a Louisville insider. He's 18 for 19 on his CB predictions this cycle...
I'm really not the guy to answer this, but there does seem to be a small group of insiders who tend to be, in the end, more accurate with their CBs than others. That said, the simple fact that some insider gives a CB to PSU bodes well, at least for the moment. Plus you got to look at the aggregate: if 95% of the insiders have a CB to PSU, then that's more telling than if 35% do.Dumb question about the crystal ball accuracy, but don't all of these analysts change crystal ball picks all the time? How in the world are they measured on accuracy when they might put in a CB for 10 different schools during a player's recruitment? All they need to do is get the last one correct once the pick is relatively obvious and they are "accurate?" It just seems like a weird metric to me. If one of them was 18 of 19 on their first CB pick for a recruit then I'd be impressed.
Interesting home furnishings, especially the commercial tree flanked by wall sign for math and chemistry tutoring.
its' free information and, at least to some extent, shows where a recruit is trending based on recent information available. TIFWIWI'm really not the guy to answer this, but there does seem to be a small group of insiders who tend to be, in the end, more accurate with their CBs than others. That said, the simple fact that some insider gives a CB to PSU bodes well, at least for the moment. Plus you got to look at the aggregate: if 95% of the insiders have a CB to PSU, then that's more telling than if 35% do.
We aren't "losing" these guys, they are being processed for lack of a better term. None are grad transfers near as I can tell and none are leaving without a release that would require them to wait a year to play FBS. My understanding is all were granted a release and can play FBS immediately, albeit I am sure Franklin/PSU has some restrictions in there.
Not a dumb question, it's a fair point. However, until the CBs actually change, it still points to good news. Wiltfong, for instance, seems to often change his CBs but he usually ultimately ends up being correct. You could look at it as not meaning much because his prediction could change. But you could also look at it as being a strong indicator unless and until he changes it. Also, 247 uses some algorithm to assign these guys points that takes into account how long they have had their CB in. Provides some incentive for them to stick to their guns (but only if the predictor cares about being assessed by 247 as a top 'expert', obviously).Dumb question about the crystal ball accuracy, but don't all of these analysts change crystal ball picks all the time? How in the world are they measured on accuracy when they might put in a CB for 10 different schools during a player's recruitment? All they need to do is get the last one correct once the pick is relatively obvious and they are "accurate?" It just seems like a weird metric to me. If one of them was 18 of 19 on their first CB pick for a recruit then I'd be impressed.
We aren't "losing" these guys, they are being processed for lack of a better term. None are grad transfers near as I can tell and none are leaving without a release that would require them to wait a year to play FBS. My understanding is all were granted a release and can play FBS immediately, albeit I am sure Franklin/PSU has some restrictions in there.
Yep, point is we aren't losing these guys, they are being made to see the light.The "release" only allows them to transfer and receive financial aid in their first at the receiving school. To play requiress an NCAA waiver, which typically is granted for cause.
Yep, point is we aren't losing these guys, they are being made to see the light.
Yep, point is we aren't losing these guys, they are being made to see the light.
Skill talent in this class is crazy good...crazy good. Too bad Fields lived too far away from PSU...oh well, his loss, Levis' gain.
Not sure why it would necessarily help them for Smith, other than it gives OSU's staff the opportunity to go after him even harder. Smith was going to be a take for them whether or not Cox was in the class.OSU lost a 5* DE Brenton Cox - seems to favor flavor of the month Georgia. Heard this hurts with Smith - maybe helps with Parsons. These next two weeks are gonna be nuts...
OSU lost a 5* DE Brenton Cox - seems to favor flavor of the month Georgia. Heard this hurts with Smith - maybe helps with Parsons. These next two weeks are gonna be nuts...
OSU lost a 5* DE Brenton Cox - seems to favor flavor of the month Georgia. Heard this hurts with Smith - maybe helps with Parsons. These next two weeks are gonna be nuts...
That's awesome... having watched a lot of camp film (nike, rivals, etc) this past summer, he's the one I was most worried about. He took some reps off but when he went hard was unblockable. Even more so than Taron Vincent. Athleticism is close to Parsons.It's a big loss for OSU ... they graduate 2 DE and another one leaving early for the NFL. They currently have 0 commits for DE so goes without saying Urbs will be full court press on Oweh Smith and Parsons
I know for a fact that OSU was selling their "trimester" system as a part of their recruiting pitch, basically saying "you won't have to worry about academics during football season." Pretty sure OSU has since been forced to switch to semesters (or maybe quarters) due a change in state law.How heavy do you think their course loads are, especially during fall (football) semester?
OSU has been anticipating the defection of 5-star QB Emory Jones (most likely to Alabama). They made a strong push for a Kentucky commit who just flipped to Miami today.3 other highly rated recruits are on flip watch from Ohio State's class. Woodbey, Proctor and Emory Jones.