http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/in...justice_j_michael_e.html#incart_story_package
They have now charged him. I welcome that, just like he does. So we have that in common, which is nice.
This is a PENNLIVE story. My operating assumption is that if there is any break they could give Eakin, they give it every time. In that light, read the linked story.
Here is a highlight for Wishful:
"By this fall, when Attorney General Kathleen Kane rekindled the case, her office was able to present the Judicial Conduct Board with evidence suggesting that Eakin was a far more active participant in the email chains.
This time, there were 943 additional files, including 157 that were in some way sent or forwarded by Eakin.
Besides the third-party attachments, these emails shared with Eakin's golfing buddies also included a handful of personal references to woman who worked for Eakin."
And then there is this, buried in the story:
"At some point, the justice created a new personal email account under the alias John Smith "as a result of the content of McGowan's emails," and then continued to willingly receive them.
He continued to receive McGowan's blasts filled with sexually-suggestive and stereotyping racial, ethnic and religious humor even after participating in a 2013 Supreme Court case that set out for all in-state judges that 'off-bench conduct is subject to discipline.'"
So, he conceded by his conduct in creating the account that the emails were wrong, and that he knew they were wrong. The attempt to hide your conduct is relevant evidence of your knowledge of its wrongful nature.
He also knew, if he was not asleep at the time of his participation in the 2013 case, that his off-bench conduct subjects him to discipline. Now it is a well-settled that excessive masturbation can make one sleepy, so maybe he will claim his was asleep when the 2013 opinion with his name on it was issued. I welcome the chance to her is answer.
He will now slightly escalate the apologetic-like statements he has made to date. He previously made apology-like noises about this when it first came out, saying it did not reveal his true nature or some such crap. Now he will step it up and maybe even go so far as to tell the Judicial Discipline Court that he deserves the lightest of punishments.
This is rapidly becoming a painful time for our friend and colleague, "Wishy" Wishful. Please be cognizant of his tender feelings as you post about this craven, racist, misogynist, hateful sonofab!tch and his attempt to pretend to give a damn about the 10-course dinner of pain his conduct has served up to The Court and the people of Pennsylvania. Craven, racist, misogynist, hateful sonsab!tches have feelings, too, and kindness requires that we recognize that Wishy feels sorry for Eakin.
They have now charged him. I welcome that, just like he does. So we have that in common, which is nice.
This is a PENNLIVE story. My operating assumption is that if there is any break they could give Eakin, they give it every time. In that light, read the linked story.
Here is a highlight for Wishful:
"By this fall, when Attorney General Kathleen Kane rekindled the case, her office was able to present the Judicial Conduct Board with evidence suggesting that Eakin was a far more active participant in the email chains.
This time, there were 943 additional files, including 157 that were in some way sent or forwarded by Eakin.
Besides the third-party attachments, these emails shared with Eakin's golfing buddies also included a handful of personal references to woman who worked for Eakin."
And then there is this, buried in the story:
"At some point, the justice created a new personal email account under the alias John Smith "as a result of the content of McGowan's emails," and then continued to willingly receive them.
He continued to receive McGowan's blasts filled with sexually-suggestive and stereotyping racial, ethnic and religious humor even after participating in a 2013 Supreme Court case that set out for all in-state judges that 'off-bench conduct is subject to discipline.'"
So, he conceded by his conduct in creating the account that the emails were wrong, and that he knew they were wrong. The attempt to hide your conduct is relevant evidence of your knowledge of its wrongful nature.
He also knew, if he was not asleep at the time of his participation in the 2013 case, that his off-bench conduct subjects him to discipline. Now it is a well-settled that excessive masturbation can make one sleepy, so maybe he will claim his was asleep when the 2013 opinion with his name on it was issued. I welcome the chance to her is answer.
He will now slightly escalate the apologetic-like statements he has made to date. He previously made apology-like noises about this when it first came out, saying it did not reveal his true nature or some such crap. Now he will step it up and maybe even go so far as to tell the Judicial Discipline Court that he deserves the lightest of punishments.
This is rapidly becoming a painful time for our friend and colleague, "Wishy" Wishful. Please be cognizant of his tender feelings as you post about this craven, racist, misogynist, hateful sonofab!tch and his attempt to pretend to give a damn about the 10-course dinner of pain his conduct has served up to The Court and the people of Pennsylvania. Craven, racist, misogynist, hateful sonsab!tches have feelings, too, and kindness requires that we recognize that Wishy feels sorry for Eakin.
