I don't mean to be sophomoric and immature but good Lord what an asswhole. His rantings make me believe he's not really all there mentally. How he can be allowed to inject any content into these ongoing debates is beyond me.
He's 79 years old....some of his Twitter enemies enjoy yanking his mental chain.I don't mean to be sophomoric and immature but good Lord what an asswhole. His rantings make me believe he's not really all there mentally. How he can be allowed to inject any content into these ongoing debates is beyond me.
I don't mean to be sophomoric and immature but good Lord what an asswhole. His rantings make me believe he's not really all there mentally. How he can be allowed to inject any content into these ongoing debates is beyond me.
I don't mean to be sophomoric and immature but good Lord what an asswhole. His rantings make me believe he's not really all there mentally. How he can be allowed to inject any content into these ongoing debates is beyond me.
I have been following all of this for a while and decided to check out his FB page. Because he allows for anyone to see what he posts, I noticed he commented on a number of articles about Joe's "10 year cover up". Kind of strange that it went from a 10 year cover up in his post on Feb 22 and now he claims he has known about a cover up since the 70's? CNN is trash.
Or maybe the 71 accuser told him not to speak about? Not saying that's the case, or I would believe it without solid evidence.Ummm if he's known about for 10 years or, now since the 70's, and hasn't said or done anything until 2011 then he's just as bad and guilty as Joe.
Hell Joe did more anyway he at least escalated it up the chain of command (which is exactly what he was supposed to do).
Maybe Bernie didn't want to get caught up in anything and shine a beacon of light in his direction. Who knows what that would have uncovered....well actually some people do know.
Or maybe the 71 accuser told him not to speak about? Not saying that's the case, or I would believe it without solid evidence.
To insinuate he's guilty of anything other than being a whack job with a vendetta (without proof) is counter productive.
Or maybe the 71 accuser told him not to speak about? Not saying that's the case, or I would believe it without solid evidence.
To insinuate he's guilty of anything other than being a whack job with a vendetta (without proof) is counter productive.
You're right, going to police when you know the witness/victim has no intention of ever admitting it is the way to go.OK. Let's take Bernie at his word.
He was a 35 year old school teacher who heard from a 16 year old that he had been violently raped.
He didn't report it to the police or any other authority.
He kept his mouth shut even as the rapist went on to establish a child-serving charity.
He kept his mouth shut even when he was picked up by local police and plead guilty to harassment charges.
Sure. Whatever. I have a bridge in Brooklyn that's for sale.
You're right, going to police when you know the witness/victim has no intention of ever admitting it is the way to go.
It's not like being raped by man would leave him with trust issues. And then having the one person you trusted ignore his promise, go to police, and invite the entire world to know of the thing he was most ashamed of.
You people endlessly talk about understanding sexual abuse and victim psychology. But as soon as it doesn't meet the standard of "This is what vindicates Joe Pa" it's all BS.
Nevermind the fact I said I wouldn't believe it without concrete evidence.
How many women did Bill Cosby rape before it became public knowledge? You don't a single one of them told a person close to them?
You're right, going to police when you know the witness/victim has no intention of ever admitting it is the way to go.
It's not like being raped by man would leave him with trust issues. And then having the one person you trusted ignore his promise, go to police, and invite the entire world to know of the thing he was most ashamed of.
You people endlessly talk about understanding sexual abuse and victim psychology. But as soon as it doesn't meet the standard of "This is what vindicates Joe Pa" it's all BS.
Nevermind the fact I said I wouldn't believe it without concrete evidence.
How many women did Bill Cosby rape before it became public knowledge? You don't a single one of them told a person close to them?
You're right, going to police when you know the witness/victim has no intention of ever admitting it is the way to go.
It's not like being raped by man would leave him with trust issues. And then having the one person you trusted ignore his promise, go to police, and invite the entire world to know of the thing he was most ashamed of.
You people endlessly talk about understanding sexual abuse and victim psychology. But as soon as it doesn't meet the standard of "This is what vindicates Joe Pa" it's all BS.
Nevermind the fact I said I wouldn't believe it without concrete evidence.
How many women did Bill Cosby rape before it became public knowledge? You don't a single one of them told a person close to them?
Bernie was not a victim, you twit.
Bernie was a fully grown adult - a school teacher - who supposedly heard the story of a child being violently raped, and Bernie did jack shit about it even though he knew Sandusky went on to establish an organization serving at-risk kids.
You can take your lame excuses and stuff them where the sun doesn't shine.
He was vetted by a Pulitzer Prize winner. That's good enough for me....I don't mean to be sophomoric and immature but good Lord what an asswhole. His rantings make me believe he's not really all there mentally. How he can be allowed to inject any content into these ongoing debates is beyond me.
Perhaps McGettigan spoke with him and "convinced" him it was almost 45 years....I have been following all of this for a while and decided to check out his FB page. Because he allows for anyone to see what he posts, I noticed he commented on a number of articles about Joe's "10 year cover up". Kind of strange that it went from a 10 year cover up in his post on Feb 22 and now he claims he has known about a cover up since the 70's? CNN is trash.
You're right, insinuating he's the one with something to hide is clearly the way to get people in your corner.Nonsense, troll.
So the victim has no problem telling Joe Paterno, who was not close to him , his story, but wouldn't tell it to the police? What did he expect Joe to do?
Cut him a check?So the victim has no problem telling Joe Paterno, who was not close to him , his story, but wouldn't tell it to the police? What did he expect Joe to do?
Cut him a check?
A few on this site are his peers in terms of pushing the crazy line. Hopefully they can maintain themselves.The last thing we need is for someone to lose his head and do that. He'll be exposed for what he is soon enough now.
Maybe go to the police with him?
Most persons would look at Bernie as being somewhat mentally challenged, better to walk away and avoid physical adversity.I can't believe no one has followed him and beat the eff out of him[/B] by now. He's a total imbecile.
I sense a Michigan troll.
I seem to recall a "Schadenfreude" poster from 10 plus years ago.
In as much as this is your first post, I am going to put you on "ignore" right out of the gate.
Art asked a hypothetical question. I provided a hypothetical answer. Not stating this is what happened.
And he couldn't do that with his foster father who made the call to Penn State against the kid's wishes? Yeah.
Except isn't it an established fact he didn't respect them prior to 2011? This is a genuine question.So you've repeated this possible scenario across several threads. So a couple of questions for you. If you were McCue and you were finally spilling the beans 40 years later, don't you think you'd say something along the lines, "this has been killing me having to hold this in for 40 years. But victim A begged me not to tell anyone. I couldn't violate his trust after he'd already been through so much." Also, have you not seen the screen capture of a post of McCue's on some form of social media where he talks about respecting Paterno until 2011 when the scandal hit? So he respected a man that he knew was privy to his friend being raped and didn't do anything about it? C'mon, that is so beyond preposterous as to not even be worth playing devil's advocate to support.
for son many years, I read several of the boards and never bothered to post. during that time, I would occasionally see the phrase "you can't spell imbecile without "mbe". Anyone know who coined that.Get back to the Liar, mbe.
No, he could have gone that route as well.
Except isn't it an established fact he didn't respect them prior to 2011? This is a genuine question.
And who says he believed it in 1972?
As far as what you should expect him to say, if we go down that road a lot of people are going to look bad based on what was said.
I'm not even trying to explain something I believe, like at all. I'm offering possibilities since nobody is even entertaining the idea something could have happened.
(phone rings)Except isn't it an established fact he didn't respect them prior to 2011? This is a genuine question.
And who says he believed it in 1972?
As far as what you should expect him to say, if we go down that road a lot of people are going to look bad based on what was said.
I'm not even trying to explain something I believe, like at all. I'm offering possibilities since nobody is even entertaining the idea something could have happened.
Have you ever wondered who coined the phrase "Coined the Phrase"?for son many years, I read several of the boards and never bothered to post. during that time, I would occasionally see the phrase "you can't spell imbecile without "mbe". Anyone know who coined that.
Yup. And they're required by law to immediately phone the nearest D1 football coach & report it.WAIT!!! If a minor tells a teacher that he/she was the victim of a sexual assault, isn't that teacher a mandated reporter? (Maybe not in 1972 but certainly today the teacher would be.)