ADVERTISEMENT

Arrington: PSU-Pitt series "I love it .... a beautiful thing"

Calm down man, I obviously know my PSU history better than you, including the 96 games against Pitt. Just because Pitt was the better team at the start, obviously they had the upper hand for a while. Another irrelevant pointless diversion by you, because Pitt leading the series back in ancient times doesn't mean any of the games were actually any good. Please stop wasting our time, you have a hard-on for Pitt, we get it.
We disagree. I don't have the need or the right to request you stop posting your opinions to a thread on this board so please afford me the same courtesy.
 
Calm down man, I obviously know my PSU history better than you, including the 96 games against Pitt. Just because Pitt was the better team at the start, obviously they had the upper hand for a while. Another irrelevant pointless diversion by you, because Pitt leading the series back in ancient times doesn't mean any of the games were actually any good. Please stop wasting our time, you have a hard-on for Pitt, we get it.
You might know little or you might know plenty. I can hang with most so I am not in awe.
 
I'd rather beat Pitt than play games vs Idaho, Georgia State, Temple, UMass, Buffalo, Akron, etc. I'm not saying replace an opportunity to play LSU, Texas, etc. (which isn't happening anyway) with Pitt, I'm saying replace these crap games NO ONE wants to watch with Pitt. At least a good number of people want to see that game.

If you think bringing in Idaho preserves some sort of chance of starting up a series with USC, you're nuts. Just wait for the announcement of a MAC team. Or, when all else fails, we'll just schedule Temple again.

The caveat, as I've always said, is Pitt has to accept a 2 for 1, otherwise it won't work for us.

Scheduling Idaho in 2019 was inevitable given that PSU only has four conference home games. With ASWP locked in for four year, that leaves PSU with one slot.. Lot of flexibility there.
 
Scheduling Idaho in 2019 was inevitable given that PSU only has four conference home games. With ASWP locked in for four year, that leaves PSU with one slot.. Lot of flexibility there.
There's only one game left to schedule that year, you want it at home, and Idaho just took a Saturday off the table. Yeah, LOTS of flexibility. Maybe we can get Delaware. Or let's relive the William and Mary game from 84 or 85.
 
There's only one game left to schedule that year, you want it at home, and Idaho just took a Saturday off the table. Yeah, LOTS of flexibility. Maybe we can get Delaware. Or let's relive the William and Mary game from 84 or 85.


Douchenozzle, it's not what I want, it's what the PSU AD want. They scheduled Idaho, not me. They articulated a policy of having seven home games, during a time when the department was actually making money. And BTW, Big Ten teams aren't allowed to schedule.\FCS schools.

So listen up, jackwagon. Since you've got such a thorough handle on what's best for PSU, why don't you direct your efforts toward that empty suit that masquerades as an AD and persuade her of the need to play ASWP. Those of us with any sense are lost causes.
 
It's more like seeing the chick you went out with for years at the supermarket and realizing that even though your wife is nice you should have never stopped having a relationship with the lady in shop rite.
Now that's funny. How anyone can make that kind of a statement is beyond believable. "Pitt is the love you never should have left" Bwahahahaha!
 
  • Like
Reactions: pandaczar12
Where do you get off assuming that I respected you in the first place?
I try to respect everybody Art. I get what your about now. Just another guy who thinks somebody with a differing opinion is the enemy. I certainly don't need your respect nor will I pain myself to try to earn it.
 
It's more like seeing the chick you went out with for years at the supermarket and realizing that even though your wife is nice you should have never stopped having a relationship with the lady in shop rite.

That's a bizarre analogy. I've more considered Pitt (and especially Pitt fans) like a psycho and bitter ex-girlfriend. We broke up and began a much better and stable relationship when they screwed us over. Screwing us over was a massive mistake on their part that began, for them, a slow spiral into oblivion. They were forced into a much less successful and satisfying relationship, all the while pretending that it was still as good as what we have, but at the same time blaming us for all the bad things that happened to them that were of our own making. And we became an unhealthy obsession where our failures brought them much more pleasure than their miniscule successes. Their message boards are the equivalent of a wall with photos of PSU players and coaches with the eyes scratched out with a knife.

What amazes me is some of us want to get back together with the psycho when there are much better options available. And after the break up, the psycho got fat, slovenly, and brings absolutely nothing to the relationship.
 
Man you guys are off the road. What happened to respect for someone even though you disagree?

Respect is earned, not given. You my friend are a long way off.

We disagree. I don't have the need or the right to request you stop posting your opinions to a thread on this board so please afford me the same courtesy.

I requested you stop wasting our time, not that you stop posting. Interesting that you take them to be one in the same.

You might know little or you might know plenty. I can hang with most so I am not in awe.

You don't know the history behind "guarding the lion", which destroys you idea that Pitt has been our only rival ever. It's not like it's some obscure story.

That's a bizarre analogy. I've more considered Pitt (and especially Pitt fans) like a psycho and bitter ex-girlfriend. We broke up and began a much better and stable relationship when they screwed us over. Screwing us over was a massive mistake on their part that began, for them, a slow spiral into oblivion. They were forced into a much less successful and satisfying relationship, all the while pretending that it was still as good as what we have, but at the same time blaming us for all the bad things that happened to them that were of our own making. And we became an unhealthy obsession where our failures brought them much more pleasure than their miniscule successes. Their message boards are the equivalent of a wall with photos of PSU players and coaches with the eyes scratched out with a knife.

What amazes me is some of us want to get back together with the psycho when there are much better options available. And after the break up, the psycho got fat, slovenly, and brings absolutely nothing to the relationship.

Very well put, describes the relationship perfectly.
 
I like the fact that we are playing Pitt for the next 4 years. 4 years might be a bit long but it is what it is. I would not make another contract with them at this time. Once we beat them during the next years we will be in the best negotiating position. We will be the ones making them money. What will we get out of it? locking the recruiting door that already seems fairly shut in Western PA. Not enough.

To play them long term they will need to give us the bigger split because we are strong enough to do so and they owe us that money from when they we strong enough to get it out of us.

If we don't get a better split then no new games after we beat them 4 in a row. The door will be locked by then.

We are and we will. Beat PITT!
 
I agree with LaVar on a lot, but not this. With the limited openings on the schedule, I would rather play home and home against teams like Texas, Alabama, Notre Dame, Oregon, USC, LSU, Florida State. Any one of those games would draw more national interest than Pitt.

However, right now neither program gains much national attention when mentioned with the teams listed. Someday and you sooner rather than us will be there but right now this game would garner just as much national attention.
 
Yo where did that come from. Relax man there was no need for that. You are taking this too far. We are just having a discussion here. Also don't shoot me with some morality play like you can label me because I used a hypothetical. There was no need to say that EPC. I know you have no love for me but that was below the belt.
Actually, I don't think about you at all, except when this subject comes up, and you keep up the crap about how great the series was and should be again. It was a good series between 1974 and 1986, and I'm stretching that time period.
Further, I have no problem with a true rivalry and the ball busting that goes along with it. This is different. I was in Pittsburgh with my daughters and wife for the last game. It was not anything within the parameters of a rivalry. It was mean, nasty and intimidating as it gets. With my buddies, there is a different outcome that day, outside the stadium. With wife and daughters, lots of vulgarity and bullying type behavior had to be swallowed. Puck Fitt.
 
Well, I never implied that Pitt was a national contender. I simply stated that they were not relevant. Northern Illinois, who are generally in the Top 25 and can beat good P5 teams, are relevant but not National Title contenders. Pitt is simply not as good of a program as Northen Illinois. And, if you read the thread, there are lots of reasons why not to play Pitt as our one home and home. But, to summarize:

1) Pitt a mediocre team that can't even break .500 while playing in the worst conference in a P5 league. They do nothing to help our strength of schedule or add a decent away game for our fan base. Please see my earlier post in this thread about P5 teams that would be better OOC games than Pitt.
2) Only a small fraction of PSU fans still consider Pitt a rival.
3) The game experience at Heinz field is horrible.
4) Fans, such as yourself, are annoying and hateful.
5) If Pitt wishes to come to Happy Valley without a return game, as Idaho is doing, most PSU fans would be happy to oblige. Temple is at the end of a 3 or 4 for 1 contract. If Pitt wants to sign one of those, I believe that most PSU fans would support that. But, that was really only offered to Temple because they had a PSU alum as they head coach. With the 9 game conference schedule, however, 2 for 1s or 3 for 1s are probably a thing of the past. Comparing a home and home to a one and done is a false equivalency. If you would pull your head out of your sphincter you would see that.
6) See #1 about Pitt being a mediocre team that does nothing to help our schedule

So, you now have your answer as to why we would not want to play another team in our state that is not our rival.

Now, please quit saying that no one will answer your question. You're just not getting the answer that you want.

Excellent job answering his question... again. Apparently he needed you to summarize what has already been said many times. I want to know why Pitt fans want to play PSU so bad, why can't they let it go? I mean, I know why, I just want to hear what BS he comes up with.
 
From an Audrey Snyder interview with Lavar Arrington

Q: Shifting gears here, but next year Pitt and Penn State will play …


A: I love it. Love it. That’s something that should always be there Pitt and Penn State should always play. Pitt was my first love obviously. You think about the guys who played at Pitt while I was growing up right literally like 10 minutes down 279, so Pitt was my first love. … Then comes D.J. Dozier, and I fell in love with Penn State and once I found out that guys who were just made to be gods in our community, Franco Harris and Jack Ham, then I found out that these guys were Penn Staters and my attention and my love affair shifted to Penn State from that moment on. That’s something that exists in a lot of people in western Pennsylvania, so it makes sense for that game to go on.

Q: Extending that series beyond 2019 is a priority for both schools, and it would seem like that’s what fans want, too. You certainly sound like you’d be on board with it.

A: Of course that’s what they want, because it’s hometown heroes playing against hometown heroes. That’s a beautiful thing to see it be able to play out on the college level.

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/...Q-A-with-LaVar-Arrington/stories/201508270114
Lavar feels this way because he was brought up in Pittsburgh and developed a love for the hometown college. Nothing wrong with that, and then saw the light that Penn State was the real deal in PA. I am from Philly but lived a few years in Pittsburgh. I for one also think we should play Pitt every year, but ONLY if Pitt becomes a B!G team. If not, they just create a nuisance towards winning the MNC as Pitt players will always play their hardest against us as they know they are the #2 team in PA.
 
LaVar is entitled to his opinion even if it's misguided.
If this post evoked such an explosive response already, than it says a lot for how people fee about renewing our rivalry against Pitt. I think that some here think that playing them every year again may steal some talented HS recruits over to Pitt. Don't fear that, the better team will win! living on both sides of PA, I for one think it would be great to play Pitt again on a regular basis.
 
LaVar is entitled to his opinion even if it's misguided.
Lavar feels this way because he was brought up in Pittsburgh and developed a love for the hometown college. Nothing wrong with that, and then saw the light that Penn State was the real deal in PA. I am from Philly but lived a few years in Pittsburgh. I for one also think we should play Pitt every year, but hope that they will some day become a B1G team. Pitt players will always play their hardest against us as they know they are the #2 team in PA. We play Temple every year, so why not Pitt?
 
Lavar feels this way because he was brought up in Pittsburgh and developed a love for the hometown college. Nothing wrong with that, and then saw the light that Penn State was the real deal in PA. I am from Philly but lived a few years in Pittsburgh. I for one also think we should play Pitt every year, but hope that they will some day become a B1G team. Pitt players will always play their hardest against us as they know they are the #2 team in PA. We play Temple every year, so why not Pitt?


PSU does not play Temple after the 2016 season. With a nine game conference schedule going forward, playing any team long-term (longer than four years) is simply imprudent.
 
Actually, I don't think about you at all, except when this subject comes up, and you keep up the crap about how great the series was and should be again. It was a good series between 1974 and 1986, and I'm stretching that time period.
Further, I have no problem with a true rivalry and the ball busting that goes along with it. This is different. I was in Pittsburgh with my daughters and wife for the last game. It was not anything within the parameters of a rivalry. It was mean, nasty and intimidating as it gets. With my buddies, there is a different outcome that day, outside the stadium. With wife and daughters, lots of vulgarity and bullying type behavior had to be swallowed. Puck Fitt.
Like I said your entitled to your opinion as am I but for you to take it to the level you did was surprising to me. We just are disagreeing on an issue, that's all.
 
You've got to be kidding.

I guess you've never heard of "guarding the lion" and the history behind it. While technically every team you play is a rival, the Pitt/PSU game was only good for about 6 years while Pitt was cheating. Anyone who went to a PSU game at Pitt saw how terrible it was to have a "real" rivalry game. Penn State has had more good games recently with Ohio State than ever with Pitt. Is it Rivalry with OSU? I don't care, it's all semantics.
So don't go to the game if you are afraid. I don't put myself in vulnerable positions so pick your spots but just because you are afraid to go and I am not does not make you right. All the fans are not as bad as some here have claimed.Guarding the lion is not new to me but Pitt is the team that almost everybody agrees is the Lions traditional rival. Hey I did not start this thread. I am just giving my opinion without malice unless I am attacked. I will go scores of games, big plays in games and where the venue was one on one with you anytime.I am not the most knowledgeable but I can hang with most.
 
I agree with LaVar on a lot, but not this. With the limited openings on the schedule, I would rather play home and home against teams like Texas, Alabama, Notre Dame, Oregon, USC, LSU, Florida State. Any one of those games would draw more national interest than Pitt.
Better than playing Temple San Diego St and Army Our schedule is pathetic We will never make a playoff playing teams like we are currently scheduling
 
  • Like
Reactions: NelsonMunce
So don't go to the game if you are afraid. I don't put myself in vulnerable positions so pick your spots but just because you are afraid to go and I am not does not make you right. All the fans are not as bad as some here have claimed.Guarding the lion is not new to me but Pitt is the team that almost everybody agrees is the Lions traditional rival. Hey I did not start this thread. I am just giving my opinion without malice unless I am attacked. I will go scores of games, big plays in games and where the venue was one on one with you anytime.I am not the most knowledgeable but I can hang with most.

People use to have a tradition of throwing virgins into volcanoes. Luckily those ended just like the Pitt/Penn State rivalry. The past is the past. Give up your flip phone and fax machine and get with new program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSU-Knocker
Better than playing Temple San Diego St and Army Our schedule is pathetic We will never make a playoff playing teams like we are currently scheduling

Once again, a home and home with Pitt vs one and dones with the teams you named is a false equivalency. If Pitt wants to come to Happy Valley for a one and done for the price that we are paying those teams and we say No, then you have a point. Also, SDSU is a better game than Pitt, and by the end of the year Temple will probably be rated higher than B5. You are, however, right about we will never impress the selection committee playing a mediocre team that can't even go above .500 in the weakest division of the P5 teams.
 
So don't go to the game if you are afraid. I don't put myself in vulnerable positions so pick your spots but just because you are afraid to go and I am not does not make you right. All the fans are not as bad as some here have claimed.Guarding the lion is not new to me but Pitt is the team that almost everybody agrees is the Lions traditional rival. Hey I did not start this thread. I am just giving my opinion without malice unless I am attacked. I will go scores of games, big plays in games and where the venue was one on one with you anytime.I am not the most knowledgeable but I can hang with most.

Just give it up, you are all over the map here. First you say you don't put yourself in vulnerable positions, then you say you are not afraid to go. Make up your mind... which is it? Never mind that I didn't say I was afraid to go to the game, I already have Pitt season tickets to ensure my tickets next year. Why are you making stuff up? Also you only seem to want to address game day. What about the 365 other days next year that some of us have to live amongst the Pitt fans? That's fine as long as selfish old SEPATOPTEN gets his 3.5 hour football game to watch from afar.

How would you know how the fans act, you don't put yourself in vulnerable positions, and you don't live nearby? Why does it even matter, it only takes percentage of bad fans to over shadow the good ones... so just more pointless distraction from you.

Back pedal! now that you've consulted google, guarding the lion is not new to you. So you've gone from "The Pitt - Penn State game was the only rivalry game PSU has ever had" to " Pitt is the team that almost everybody agrees is the Lions traditional rival". Can't win the current argument, so you tried to change it? Did you think we wouldn't notice? We are all much smarter than you. In a contest of PSU football knowledge, you'd need to do more than "just hang", I would f&cking crush you.

Everyone knows your opinion, no one cares, and no one wants to hear it again. You are simply here to troll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PSU-Knocker and Art
I'd much rather play Pitt than SDSU, Buffalo, Army or Temple. Maybe alternate the series between Temple and Pitt each year but one of them should be on the schedule. I hate, hate our schedule of OOC recently. Just awful and no I don't care about "getting the wins". Everyone who travels to SC and pays hard earned money wants to see a game they care about watching. And if your care about 107,000 strong you should care about this issue long term. It will support the program's attendance long term even if you think Pitt is unworthy. There will be interest. Just look at the number of threads it generates each year.


You are absolutely correct. All these naysayers act like we've had 'loaded' OOC opponents for years, and that this ancient rivalry is 'below' us. How the heck do we constantly get Buffalo?? And the genius AD just scheduled Potato U, and it's not even Boise State. Yeah, the Pitt idea is a real step down.
 
You are absolutely correct. All these naysayers act like we've had 'loaded' OOC opponents for years, and that this ancient rivalry is 'below' us. How the heck do we constantly get Buffalo?? And the genius AD just scheduled Potato U, and it's not even Boise State. Yeah, the Pitt idea is a real step down.
That's not the argument I'm making, and it's not the argument most here are making. Sure, Pitt would be better than Temple, or Buffalo, or Army. But Pitt would not be better than LSU, USC, Texas, or dozens of other schools with higher national profile than Pitt. If we are going to do a home and home, why not try to schedule Georgia? Why not talk to the AD at Florida State. If other national names turn us down, we have Pitt. We can always get Pitt. Instead of Pitt coming to town in 2017, imagine if it were USC or Texas. Pitt, as a rivalry, is dead, and Pitt, as a national power, is on life support. We can do better.
 
That's not the argument I'm making, and it's not the argument most here are making. Sure, Pitt would be better than Temple, or Buffalo, or Army. But Pitt would not be better than LSU, USC, Texas, or dozens of other schools with higher national profile than Pitt. If we are going to do a home and home, why not try to schedule Georgia? Why not talk to the AD at Florida State. If other national names turn us down, we have Pitt. We can always get Pitt. Instead of Pitt coming to town in 2017, imagine if it were USC or Texas. Pitt, as a rivalry, is dead, and Pitt, as a national power, is on life support. We can do better.

Not only is it on life support now, it barely ever existed. We can do much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m48tank
You are absolutely correct. All these naysayers act like we've had 'loaded' OOC opponents for years, and that this ancient rivalry is 'below' us. How the heck do we constantly get Buffalo?? And the genius AD just scheduled Potato U, and it's not even Boise State. Yeah, the Pitt idea is a real step down.

Once again, comparing a home and home with Pitt to a one and done with Idaho, as much as they suck, is a false equivalency. If you want to complain about Idaho, complain that we're unable, or unwilling to pay, for a game with a decent mid major, like Northern Illinois, Houston, Louisiana Tech or even Georgia Southern. Only the most delusional PSU fan will defend out scheduling, but having a mediocre team like PItt on our schedule for 4 years is part of the problem. I'm actually happy about San Diego State in that they actually have a pulse, which is better than any of the other stiffs we've scheduled in the past 5 years..
 
State's rivals are OSU, Michigan and Sparty to win any kind of hardware! Do we need anymore rivals than that? Osu #1, Sparty #6 and um with Harbaugh the talk of fastest comeback to elite status ever! Take care of the B1GEast and we can schedule whoever!
I'm done repeating that we have teams that we want to beat... in fact, there is no one else that I would rather beat than the Buckeyes... but to suggest that they are our rivals... well I guess to some extent they are the way we used to have rivalries against WVU and Syracuse. The truth was that everyone knows that they consider Michigan as there number one rival. We used to have a rival and whether you admit it, understand it, or acknowledge it... it was Pitt. Rutgers & Maryland would like to elevate our game to be that type of rivalry, but I just don't see it happening anytime soon.
Once again, comparing a home and home with Pitt to a one and done with Idaho, as much as they suck, is a false equivalency. If you want to complain about Idaho, complain that we're unable, or unwilling to pay, for a game with a decent mid major, like Northern Illinois, Houston, Louisiana Tech or even Georgia Southern. Only the most delusional PSU fan will defend out scheduling, but having a mediocre team like PItt on our schedule for 4 years is part of the problem. I'm actually happy about San Diego State in that they actually have a pulse, which is better than any of the other stiffs we've scheduled in the past 5 years..

I can live with what you are saying as far as scheduling a decent team... however, as an old timer... I miss having a true rival... I doubt very much that either Rutgers or Maryland will ever turn into the rivalry that we used to have with Pitt. I grew up with it and for most years it was something to look forward to at the end of the season. As I stated earlier, unless you went to school before 1986, you probably have no appreciation for the series. The 1981 game (48-14) is still one of my all time favorites. I'm sorry but I would much rather play Pitt than a San Diego State, Temple, etc. I don't care who is the better team! Just like Georgia plays Georgia Tech every year... playing Pitt and beating them would mean a lot more to me than playing one of the other duds that we seem to be scheduling.
 
Anyone who truly understands college football agrees with Lavar on this.


From an Audrey Snyder interview with Lavar Arrington

Q: Shifting gears here, but next year Pitt and Penn State will play …


A: I love it. Love it. That’s something that should always be there Pitt and Penn State should always play. Pitt was my first love obviously. You think about the guys who played at Pitt while I was growing up right literally like 10 minutes down 279, so Pitt was my first love. … Then comes D.J. Dozier, and I fell in love with Penn State and once I found out that guys who were just made to be gods in our community, Franco Harris and Jack Ham, then I found out that these guys were Penn Staters and my attention and my love affair shifted to Penn State from that moment on. That’s something that exists in a lot of people in western Pennsylvania, so it makes sense for that game to go on.

Q: Extending that series beyond 2019 is a priority for both schools, and it would seem like that’s what fans want, too. You certainly sound like you’d be on board with it.

A: Of course that’s what they want, because it’s hometown heroes playing against hometown heroes. That’s a beautiful thing to see it be able to play out on the college level.

http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/...Q-A-with-LaVar-Arrington/stories/201508270114
 
Anyone who truly understands college football agrees with Lavar on this.
I know a guy who was an assistant coach at the FBS level for 4 years before taking a highly paid sales position to better support his family. He did not coach, or play, at either Pitt or Penn State, so he does not have a dog in the hunt. He does not agree with Lavar. The next time I see him I will be sure to tell him that TCFA-Nit says he does not understand the college game. I am sure he will be amused.:) I will add, from my own perspective, that making such an intransigent statement on an issue which can easily, and effectively, be argued either way, makes you look foolish.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: m48tank
State's rivals are OSU, Michigan and Sparty to win any kind of hardware! Do we need anymore rivals than that? Osu #1, Sparty #6 and um with Harbaugh the talk of fastest comeback to elite status ever! Take care of the B1GEast and we can schedule whoever!

Apparently MSU, UM and OSU disagree. Looking at a sampling of their future OOC schedules they are planning to do (at least some years) what you say PSU does not need to do:

OSU ---> Oregon St/TCU ---- ND/Texas ---- ND/Texas/BC

UM ----> Utah/OregonSt/BYU ------ Florida/Cincy/AirForce ---- VT/Washington

Mich St --> BYU/ND ---- BYU/Miami
 
Apparently MSU, UM and OSU disagree. Looking at a sampling of their future OOC schedules they are planning to do (at least some years) what you say PSU does not need to do:

OSU ---> Oregon St/TCU ---- ND/Texas ---- ND/Texas/BC

UM ----> Utah/OregonSt/BYU ------ Florida/Cincy/AirForce ---- VT/Washington

Mich St --> BYU/ND ---- BYU/Miami
What does any of that have to do with playing Pitt? Also many have advocated playing schools such as those you listed and have done so in this very thread. Are you too lazy to read or do you just ignore those posts?
 
What does any of that have to do with playing Pitt? Also many have advocated playing schools such as those you listed and have done so in this very thread. Are you too lazy to read or do you just ignore those posts?

Apparently you couldn't take time to read the post I was replying to, which said since PSU plays MSU, UM and OSU we don't have to schedule anyone OOC,
 
Apparently MSU, UM and OSU disagree. Looking at a sampling of their future OOC schedules they are planning to do (at least some years) what you say PSU does not need to do:

OSU ---> Oregon St/TCU ---- ND/Texas ---- ND/Texas/BC

UM ----> Utah/OregonSt/BYU ------ Florida/Cincy/AirForce ---- VT/Washington

Mich St --> BYU/ND ---- BYU/Miami


The 2017 Michigan-Florida game is neutral site in Jerrah World by invitation only. I think PSU would accept a one-and-done $6mm payout, but nobody has offered.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT