ADVERTISEMENT

Brandon Short says it WAS NIL that cost us our basketball coach.

we will see
I mean, he's right though. The NFL has absolutely no incentive to have a minor league system. I'm sure the NHL would love not to have to rely on the AHL. The minor leagues of MLB are a complete disaster at this point.

Athletes like Bronny James and Livvy Dunne will make money wherever they go but for many it's dependent on the schoool.
 
we will see
In football, presumably the model would be small to medium size metro areas. After Philly and Pittsburgh in PA, it is Allentown/Lehigh Valley as the next largest. Who generates more revenue, minor league Allentown, or Penn State, the flagship football school of the northeast with alumni all over the country that produces 10,000 new fans every freshman class?
 
you say SWH wants to do NIL differently from every other school. How does SWH want to do it?
They posted early on some things that didn't sit well with me like spending money for internships and overseas trips, but they wouldn't disclose anything in more detail. Those activities sound to me like they are easily abused. Is some business connected to these founders that control a good bit of State College business benefitting by getting athletes to "work" internships and then get paid PSU fan donation money or get the athlete for free and they are paid by the collective? Are there people connected to the founders chaperoning the overseas trips and who is paying for that? What is the purpose of those trips?

Other schools are setting up opportunities for the student-athletes to make money off of their NIL, period. None of this internship and international travel side show. Then we hear about our players not getting the same dollar amount NIL deals as some of our competitors because, guess what? They aren't playing these other games but instead maximizing the NIL earning potential of the student-athletes.

I don't know how much of this stuff SWH is still pursuing or if they are getting in line with other competitor collectives, but they are putting PSU at a disadvantage to our peers.
 
They posted early on some things that didn't sit well with me like spending money for internships and overseas trips, but they wouldn't disclose anything in more detail. Those activities sound to me like they are easily abused. Is some business connected to these founders that control a good bit of State College business benefitting by getting athletes to "work" internships and then get paid PSU fan donation money or get the athlete for free and they are paid by the collective? Are there people connected to the founders chaperoning the overseas trips and who is paying for that? What is the purpose of those trips?

Other schools are setting up opportunities for the student-athletes to make money off of their NIL, period. None of this internship and international travel side show. Then we hear about our players not getting the same dollar amount NIL deals as some of our competitors because, guess what? They aren't playing these other games but instead maximizing the NIL earning potential of the student-athletes.

I don't know how much of this stuff SWH is still pursuing or if they are getting in line with other competitor collectives, but they are putting PSU at a disadvantage to our peers.
that's pretty dumb. nobody is going to want that. here is your deal, we will make you work in the off-season
 
They posted early on some things that didn't sit well with me like spending money for internships and overseas trips, but they wouldn't disclose anything in more detail. Those activities sound to me like they are easily abused. Is some business connected to these founders that control a good bit of State College business benefitting by getting athletes to "work" internships and then get paid PSU fan donation money or get the athlete for free and they are paid by the collective? Are there people connected to the founders chaperoning the overseas trips and who is paying for that? What is the purpose of those trips?

Other schools are setting up opportunities for the student-athletes to make money off of their NIL, period. None of this internship and international travel side show. Then we hear about our players not getting the same dollar amount NIL deals as some of our competitors because, guess what? They aren't playing these other games but instead maximizing the NIL earning potential of the student-athletes.

I don't know how much of this stuff SWH is still pursuing or if they are getting in line with other competitor collectives, but they are putting PSU at a disadvantage to our peers.
So do you have a link to support your claims, or are we just supposed to believe you, agenda and all?
But just to play along for a second: Given the low % of college athletes who will ever play professionally, especially for 5+ years, I think that the students would be better-served in the long run by a paid internship, which could lead to a post-athletics career, versus a stack of cash to blow on bottle service and a car. But to each their own!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RussianEagle
So do you have a link to support your claims, or are we just supposed to believe you, agenda and all?
But just to play along for a second: Given the low % of college athletes who will ever play professionally, especially for 5+ years, I think that the students would be better-served in the long run by a paid internship, which could lead to a post-athletics career, versus a stack of cash to blow on bottle service and a car. But to each their own!
You don't believe the players focused on NIL money truly believe they're playing professionally? Even Livvy Dunne isn't going to LSU for an education.
 
So do you have a link to support your claims, or are we just supposed to believe you, agenda and all?
But just to play along for a second: Given the low % of college athletes who will ever play professionally, especially for 5+ years, I think that the students would be better-served in the long run by a paid internship, which could lead to a post-athletics career, versus a stack of cash to blow on bottle service and a car. But to each their own!
Miami had a player who got $800k of NIL. he is better off by taking that.
 
So do you have a link to support your claims, or are we just supposed to believe you, agenda and all?
But just to play along for a second: Given the low % of college athletes who will ever play professionally, especially for 5+ years, I think that the students would be better-served in the long run by a paid internship, which could lead to a post-athletics career, versus a stack of cash to blow on bottle service and a car. But to each their own!
Believe what you want. I don't care. This is the 2nd time you've posted that I have an agenda. The information I am referring to is what was posted on the ON3 site when SWH first had announced it's collective. But seriously, I don't care what you think. It appears that no matter what I post, it will be because I have this agenda you keep talking about. I'll give you my agenda, I am for PSU being it's best in all things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacNit07
Apparently, Shrews interviewed for ND after the Rutgers game? And, really, did he or anyone think that in his two years at PSU, the NIL model at the university was going to change in a seismic way? It's like Shrews saying that the facilities process was too slow. No sh**, it takes years to plan and build. Frankly, I'm glad we have Rhoades (a proven HC with tournament experience), who at least appears to be in this for the longer term than Shrews. I think NIL was him saving face since he knew he was gone anyways. It's amazing the uproar we are seeing for a coach, who if it wasn't for a hot final couple of weeks, was grossly underachieving with this team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GSPMax and MacNit07
Apparently, Shrews interviewed for ND after the Rutgers game? And, really, did he or anyone think that in his two years at PSU, the NIL model at the university was going to change in a seismic way? It's like Shrews saying that the facilities process was too slow. No sh**, it takes years to plan and build. Frankly, I'm glad we have Rhoades (a proven HC with tournament experience), who at least appears to be in this for the longer term than Shrews. I think NIL was him saving face since he knew he was gone anyways. It's amazing the uproar we are seeing for a coach, who if it wasn't for a hot final couple of weeks, was grossly underachieving with this team.
Grossly underachieving. Hot run or not he accomplished more last year than any Penn State basketball coach in 20 years right? In his second year
 
Grossly underachieving. Hot run or not he accomplished more last year than any Penn State basketball coach in 20 years right? In his second year
Not buying that, his run was no better than the NIT title year when we should have been in the tournament and this run was built primarily with Chambers' players and pipeline and he did underachieve for a portion of the year which set up a second round matchup with a high rated seed. If he performed well, we could have drawn a much higher seed and had more favorable matchups and a much deeper run. With that said, Micah did a good job overall.
 
May have been better but COVID prevents us from saying it was
it was better, and i am no fan of PC

that team was getting a much better seed than 10, anywhere between 4 and 6

advancing one round is a good thing but doesn't define the whole season
 
it was better, and i am no fan of PC

that team was getting a much better seed than 10, anywhere between 4 and 6

advancing one round is a good thing but doesn't define the whole season
Fair but, to me, how you do in the post season does define the team. Had we been a 4-6 seed and lost in the first it would have been worse than this year.
 
Fair but, to me, how you do in the post season does define the team. Had we been a 4-6 seed and lost in the first it would have been worse than this year.
i don't agree with that

compare a team that is a #2 seed and loses to a #15 vs one who slips in as #11, advances one round and gets bounced. The program who had the #2 seed had a better season
 
Focus primarily on the bread-n-butter which is football is what I say!

We’re close to winning a championship right now fresh off a Rose Bowl Win, u know how ecstatic the state would be if we actually won a championship within the next few years.

Win a championship, & football will help fund the university several times over going forward from here!

We need a new stadium badly, focus on that first-n-foremost, & everything else will take care of itself!
 
Interesting video but I take it with a grain of salt. I can't imagine anybody on the BOT trying to undermine sports. Voting no on major infrastructure projects is more likely due to concerns about cost and how to pay for it. That's not a bad thing.

Here's what I haven't seen from Short, Mauti, or anybody. How do we get more NIL money?
I want to know what PSU NFLers have contributed to the collectives? Thats validation if they are giving back just a little bit of the millions they are earning.

Can’t PSUAA levy a $5 Collective contrition to the annual membership? Can’t PSU put a $2 surcharge on all tickets sold? You will not get local business support much at all. They aren’t big enough.
 
Why? They were a better team. Because we won exactly 1 round in NCAA? Big whoop.
And made the final of the Big Ten tourney
It doesn't matter how you do in the regular season if you don't execute in the post-season IMO
The goal of sports is to win titles not just get in
 
Apparently, Shrews interviewed for ND after the Rutgers game? And, really, did he or anyone think that in his two years at PSU, the NIL model at the university was going to change in a seismic way? It's like Shrews saying that the facilities process was too slow. No sh**, it takes years to plan and build. Frankly, I'm glad we have Rhoades (a proven HC with tournament experience), who at least appears to be in this for the longer term than Shrews. I think NIL was him saving face since he knew he was gone anyways. It's amazing the uproar we are seeing for a coach, who if it wasn't for a hot final couple of weeks, was grossly underachieving with this team.

It seems some people just took what Brandon Short said as gospel, got angry, and just ran with it.

I have no doubt PSU is behind many and can improve NIL but I have a hard time believing it was the main reason Shrews left for Notre Dame. It’s not like he went to Texas A&M or Bama where they have huge money pipelines for athletes. He went to Notre Dame who is not exactly all on board with NIL either.

Mike Brey basically blasted coaches/ administrators at an ACC meeting to get over their aversion to NIL and get used to it. He also said managing it within the mission of the University of ND was complicated and a factor in him deciding to move on. The ND prez and AD have both taken heat for the recent op ed piece saying NIL needed to be reigned in and controlled better.

There are plenty of places Shrews could have gone for significantly better NIL positions if that was the prime issue driving his decision, but ND does not appear to be one of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scrivener
I want to know what PSU NFLers have contributed to the collectives? Thats validation if they are giving back just a little bit of the millions they are earning.

Can’t PSUAA levy a $5 Collective contrition to the annual membership? Can’t PSU put a $2 surcharge on all tickets sold? You will not get local business support much at all. They aren’t big enough.
No, the alumni association can't be involved in NIL nor can they add any fees/donations etc. It must be 100% private.
 
It seems some people just took what Brandon Short said as gospel, got angry, and just ran with it.

I have no doubt PSU is behind many and can improve NIL but I have a hard time believing it was the main reason Shrews left for Notre Dame. It’s not like he went to Texas A&M or Bama where they have huge money pipelines for athletes. He went to Notre Dame who is not exactly all on board with NIL either.

Mike Brey basically blasted coaches/ administrators at an ACC meeting to get over their aversion to NIL and get used to it. He also said managing it within the mission of the University of ND was complicated and a factor in him deciding to move on. The ND prez and AD have both taken heat for the recent op ed piece saying NIL needed to be reigned in and controlled better.

There are plenty of places Shrews could have gone for significantly better NIL positions if that was the prime issue driving his decision, but ND does not appear to be one of them.
ND isn't on-board with NIL?
 
I have no opinion but want to share why. We cannot simply give sports a blank check. So there has to be a limit in what investments we are willing to make in sports programs. Football pretty much is self-sustained in terms of funding.

But this points to why it is so hard to build a program. Funding is used to our advantage over schools like Purdue, Indiana and Pitt. Nobody here complains. But when it is used against us by bigger powers like ND, there is an outrage.

It is hard for PSU to fund facilities and programs in basketball when others have for decades. We could spend billions and have it no pay off. And that money would have to come from some other meaningful initiative. Giving a coach unlimited money without the rest of the program makes little sense. Was the last coach good or lucky? He road pickett to a big payday just as Moorehead road Saquon Barkly to a big payday. today, he's head coach of Akron (and his kid camped at PSU as a QB recruit recently).
I didn't follow Shrews before or during his stint at State. So just taking the March Madness games into account, I'm not sure how this year's strategy of a physical guard, 3 point shooters, with below average rebounding translates to next year or beyond. I agree a coach can ride the performance of a player or two. So I have no knee-jerk reaction to his leaving and not that much regret that State didn't open up their pocket books more than they did. If he was going to leave after two years, he would leave after 3, 4, etc. Taking the State's sports that have had success, it seems their NIL dollars should be prioritized in football, with hockey, wrestling, and possibly women's volleyball competing with basketball for a share. I just can't see opening the vault for a coach with limited head coaching success in a sport that isn't near the top of fanbase interest or their conference and national rankings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obliviax
And made the final of the Big Ten tourney
It doesn't matter how you do in the regular season if you don't execute in the post-season IMO
The goal of sports is to win titles not just get in
yeah but those runs are not getting titles

the BTT run was better than the win over A&M IMO. and even that was due to being on the more favorable side of the bracket. change our seed by one spot up or down and i dont think we get past Friday
 
yeah but those runs are not getting titles

the BTT run was better than the win over A&M IMO. and even that was due to being on the more favorable side of the bracket. change our seed by one spot up or down and i dont think we get past Friday
Right. They didn't achieve the goal but they advanced. Going out in the first round IMO nullifies a good year.
 
I didn't follow Shrews before or during his stint at State. So just taking the March Madness games into account, I'm not sure how this year's strategy of a physical guard, 3 point shooters, with below average rebounding translates to next year or beyond. I agree a coach can ride the performance of a player or two. So I have no knee-jerk reaction to his leaving and not that much regret that State didn't open up their pocket books more than they did. If he was going to leave after two years, he would leave after 3, 4, etc. Taking the State's sports that have had success, it seems their NIL dollars should be prioritized in football, with hockey, wrestling, and possibly women's volleyball competing with basketball for a share. I just can't see opening the vault for a coach with limited head coaching success in a sport that isn't near the top of fanbase interest or their conference and national rankings.
offensive rebounding was at the very bottom of d1, right?

i was totally on board with MS as our coach, and would have been glad if he stayed. but looking at it from a distance ND made a very odd move IMO, especially if their interest started after the loss to Rutgers. that loss almost ruined the entire season. it is a distinct possibility that we wound up with an upgrade
 
  • Like
Reactions: bytir and scrivener
I didn't follow Shrews before or during his stint at State. So just taking the March Madness games into account, I'm not sure how this year's strategy of a physical guard, 3 point shooters, with below average rebounding translates to next year or beyond. I agree a coach can ride the performance of a player or two. So I have no knee-jerk reaction to his leaving and not that much regret that State didn't open up their pocket books more than they did. If he was going to leave after two years, he would leave after 3, 4, etc. Taking the State's sports that have had success, it seems their NIL dollars should be prioritized in football, with hockey, wrestling, and possibly women's volleyball competing with basketball for a share. I just can't see opening the vault for a coach with limited head coaching success in a sport that isn't near the top of fanbase interest or their conference and national rankings.
I can't say for sure, but it could be a case of painting the barn red because you have red paint. As you develop your roster you can start to play your style of play.
 
We get it that you are team Mauti in every way, including posturing that he is not financially profiting. He made $2.7 million in the NFL, which cannot last forever, and his LinkedIn suggests that he can't really manage to hold a steady job, so maybe his outrage is coming from a different place? And either way his group apparently only ever intended to help football players, so why is he pissy about the basketball situation, and specifically a group that was clearly attempting to spread the wealth around everywhere (for better or worse)?
That’s my fear. Could every one of these ex-athletes be basically seeing NIL “collectives” as a way to personally profit? While we are on this message board bickering over which collective is the most moral, but in reality are simply taking the side of the ones our favorite athletes are involved with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mgkpsu
Has Jay ever been successful at anything?
Why is Jay Paterno getting singled out for the problems with “Success with Honor” instead of the ex-athletes on its advisory board like Mike Robinson and Calvin Booth? Maybe just because Jay is an easy target (not a star athlete, was handed a coaching position due to his father) and not because Jay is actually in the wrong on this situation.
 
They posted early on some things that didn't sit well with me like spending money for internships and overseas trips, but they wouldn't disclose anything in more detail. Those activities sound to me like they are easily abused. Is some business connected to these founders that control a good bit of State College business benefitting by getting athletes to "work" internships and then get paid PSU fan donation money or get the athlete for free and they are paid by the collective? Are there people connected to the founders chaperoning the overseas trips and who is paying for that? What is the purpose of those trips?

Other schools are setting up opportunities for the student-athletes to make money off of their NIL, period. None of this internship and international travel side show. Then we hear about our players not getting the same dollar amount NIL deals as some of our competitors because, guess what? They aren't playing these other games but instead maximizing the NIL earning potential of the student-athletes.

I don't know how much of this stuff SWH is still pursuing or if they are getting in line with other competitor collectives, but they are putting PSU at a disadvantage to our peers.
Are the athletes at these other school really making money of their NIL, period? Or are they just receiving gifts. I thought the whole purpose of NIL was so the student-athletes can provide something in return to the business or individuals providing them $$$
 
Are the athletes at these other school really making money of their NIL, period? Or are they just receiving gifts. I thought the whole purpose of NIL was so the student-athletes can provide something in return to the business or individuals providing them $$$
I have no issue with the athletes providing something, advertising, whatever to the businesses contributing money to an NIL collective or working an NIL deal directly with the athletes.

I do take issue with a collective potentially taking fan donations and then using that money to set up an NIL deal with the athletes to the benefit the personal businesses of the collective's founders.

I also take issue with taking fan donations for NIL and then using that money to set up unpaid internships or spending it on overseas trips for the athletes. That is just siphoning money from fans for things that do not maximize NIL earnings.
 
Why is Jay Paterno getting singled out for the problems with “Success with Honor” instead of the ex-athletes on its advisory board like Mike Robinson and Calvin Booth? Maybe just because Jay is an easy target (not a star athlete, was handed a coaching position due to his father) and not because Jay is actually in the wrong on this situation.
Or is it that Jay is only concerned with one thing and he was elected solely because of his dad. Calvin and Mike likely deserved some criticism as well but at least both did more than simply be Joe's son.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT