I didn't follow Shrews before or during his stint at State. So just taking the March Madness games into account, I'm not sure how this year's strategy of a physical guard, 3 point shooters, with below average rebounding translates to next year or beyond. I agree a coach can ride the performance of a player or two. So I have no knee-jerk reaction to his leaving and not that much regret that State didn't open up their pocket books more than they did. If he was going to leave after two years, he would leave after 3, 4, etc. Taking the State's sports that have had success, it seems their NIL dollars should be prioritized in football, with hockey, wrestling, and possibly women's volleyball competing with basketball for a share. I just can't see opening the vault for a coach with limited head coaching success in a sport that isn't near the top of fanbase interest or their conference and national rankings.