This article is poorly written but highlights the confusion as to what happened that night in Lasch. According to this, Mike describes a scenario where the most logical conclusion is that a rape is occuring, but he never commits and actually uses the word rape. And here’s where the disconnect comes in for me: Did Mike describe what he saw in detail to Shultz and Curley (we know he didn’t with Joe per Mike’s own testimony), or did he just share that with the Grand Jury? I just don’t think Mike told any of Shultz, Spanier, his dad, or Dranov what is reported in this article, otherwise they would have told him to phone the police or they would have done it themselves. After all, Dranov is a mandatory reporter and to date hasn’t been charged with anything. So Mike doesn’t tell anyone he’s sure Sandusky was raping a child, but then 10 years or so later tells that to a grand jury? He’s okay for all those years seeing Sandusky at golf tournaments and knowing that he hasn’t been arrested or, to his knowledge, even investigated by the police??? This is the part of it that I just can’t make sense of.
https://www.theatlantic.com/nationa...ublic-account-what-he-saw-sandusky-do/334170/
.....According to this, Mike describes a scenario where the most logical conclusion is that a rape is occurring, but he never commits and actually uses the word rape....
Here is TWO of the key issues throughout the TSM-Sandusky Scandal:
- The ability to hide the details of an event by having many years between the event and the testimony given
- The ability to create speculative mis-information based upon a current "reading" of what could have happened years before
This Time-Bias feature created by a 10 year event being reconstructed is at the core of this scandal - AND - this feature was NOT AN ACCIDENT!
The OAG who crafted all of this and the actions taken by the State of PA in all its dealings with Penn State over the past 7+ years strongly validates that what is "public knowledge" - the core of this "Story" - is based upon the above Time-bias principals.
The article quoted concerning MM's testimony was December 2011 - a period in time when the State of PA held all the information "hostage" concerning Sandusky and Penn State via its unlawful use of the Grand Jury process - it was based on this limited, and known to be manipulated, set of facts.
However,
even in 2011 with the unique benefits to control information, the State could not hide the fact that MM testimony only
"assumed" there was "a rape". Also, remember...this was, based on OAG statements, the rape of someone "...known but to God..." involving a public figure (Sandusky) who
AT THE TIME had no reason to be questioned as to general criminal activity.
The creation in the public's mind that the investigated and closed 1997 event should have been the trigger for the OAG's assertion of criminal activity
is nothing more than a construction SELECTIVELY created to support - not the law - but to support their "Story" and out-side of the law objective.
Today...a better way of uncovering what REALLY happened with MM's testimony is not the testimony itself. Time- biasing and OAG manipulation POSSIBILITIES should have alerted everyone that a better method of "getting MM's message" would be to e
xamine the ACTIONS of everyone who MM spoke to in 2001. In 2001 no one acted like a crime was being reported or committed. Numerous unconnected persons confirmed this fact BY THEIR TESTIMONIES AND ACTIONS universally exhibited in 2001.
The actions taken in 2001 is the real testimony. The OAG engineered "Story" only can exist when these
action confirmed facts are ignored. The "Story" the OAG created and was sold to the public and is how a $250M theft of public funds and criminal abuse of the power of the State was accomplished.
Do not forget what the "Story"
to this day is..... the "Public Truth" -
Joe Paterno and the Administration of Penn State University" conspired for years to hide the sexual criminal activities of Jerry Sandusky - the Football Coach at PSU. This statement itself is absurd, but today...."for years" and conspiracy elements of this falsehood have now been revealed as an engineered LIE - legally and factually.
Without the benefits obtained by the
ability to BEND testimony on an event that happened 10 year prior and without the ability to craft a "Story" based upon KNOWN bad recounts into the OAG Presentment, the "Penn State Sex Scandal" would not be possible.
Maybe we should look at the one common element here - the "suspicious" actions and motives of the PA OAG and all State of PA agencies and personnel directly involved.
As a public.... we have more than enough known information today to allow us to SERIOUSLY ASSUME those involved in the State are fundamentally lying about PSU and have been consistently acting beyond what is legal.
