Did you read Emmert's letter to PSU? That mentions the relevant rules. Can't have sanctions without infractions.
FC: ESPN takes on Penn State once again
- Thread starter GulfCoastLion
- Start date
I've even shown you evidence of my medal with a personalized message to you, but you are too stubborn to admit you are wrong.
So then you launch into your insane "Well, just because Congress creates a medal doesn't make a Congressional medal". Get bent.
"Relevant rules" are not infractions. Nothing in the database. You lose.
How about this:
James Franklin Press Conference Recap
"I believe in the history of this institution. I believe in the core values of this institution...I believe in everything that this place is about."
www.blackshoediaries.com
You aren't honored to follow someone (or call them great) if you think they covered up for a child abuser.
LOLOLOLOLOL. He absolutely was.
Of all the dumb things you've said, this might be the dumbest.
That's incorrect. Hypotheses are disproved, not proved. You might have slept through all your STEM classes.
It's called getting a speedy trial the Sixth Amendment? Plus Centre County didn't have much of a backlog. That it took FOUR years after Spanier's conviction (FIVE YEARS after his being charged) to get him in jail was a complete travesty of justice. So yeah, using the Spanier unjust timetable, it was quick but proper.
Nope
It's the truth. Simple truth is better than BS long winded arguments you use.
That Jury thing again. No reading between the lines needed.
That First Amendment thing again. Life's not fair but these convictions were.
Not really. Plus kids don't keep diaries and probably didn't want to think about it too much. It is not that big a deal.
By who?
He did not. You cited it and the source was BS.
That was just when he started. There was oral sex and other disgusting stuff. Again, if you want to compare your bar escapade with the accounts of those kids go ahead but it just makes you look like a bigger fool than before. Which is something.
Several
Already told you.
The order was placed. This is pretty simple really.
No, but if you provide independently verifiable proof by me I will acknowledge it. I won't apologize because you made the claims while anonymous but that is the past.
Ponder it.
Not necessarily.
You don't know what you're talking about.
Speculation
You can do that yourself
Dude. Now I know you are just a troll.
I'm pasting this from an elementary school science curriculum so it is simple enough for you (emphasis mine).
"Can You Prove a Hypothesis Is True?
It takes just one exception to disprove a hypothesis. But what if the hypothesis really is true? Can this be demonstrated as well? No; it would require testing all possible combinations of objects to show that they always reach the ground at the same time. This is impossible. It’s always possible an exception would be found in the future to disprove the hypothesis. Although you can’t prove conclusively that a hypothesis is true, the more evidence you gather in support of it, the more likely it is to be true.
Playing to the crowd. He's never said CSS, Sandusky or Paterno were innocent.How about this:
"He specifically stated that he was honored to follow the "great Joe Paterno""James Franklin Press Conference Recap
"I believe in the history of this institution. I believe in the core values of this institution...I believe in everything that this place is about."
You aren't honored to follow someone (or call them great) if you think they covered up for a child abuser.
Why didn't he testify for Sandusky then? LOL He wasn't victim 2.
Well, I was answering a stupid post you made so I made it where you would understand it.
You didn't make a hypothesis. You made a statement of fact. Did you read what I cited above?
Give me an example of what you consider independently verifiable, because I consider triplicate evidence that all matches up to be that but you apparently do not. I don't think anything I show you on the internet you will admit is real (because you think everything is photoshopped). So tell me what you want to see. Be specific.
WTAF? You won't apologize for calling me a liar, repeatedly and in an extremely insulting fashion, when I prove you wrong because...that was the past???? That's how apologies work, you cretin. You apologize for things you've done in the past.
How would you like me to prove it wasn't purchased on amazon? Because it wasn't.
You are a POS troll.
It will get me banned so use your mind to discern.
Not from azzholes who remain anonymous.
So you think Franklin thinks Paterno was "guilty" but called him "great" and said it was an honor to follow him? You are in insane person. Please seek help.
Because that would have ruined his ill gotten payday.
So maybe just accept that I was awarded the medal that I earned. That's honestly the simplest answer (which is also true).
I don't lie, Super Chief.
I don't think Franklin cares.
Speculation. He was not Victim 2 and he knew it.
Stay in your lane and speak only when spoken to. You are guest here. Act like it.
Speculation.
All the evidence points to him being Victim 2. There is zero reason to think he wasn't victim 2 (and he got paid as victim 2).
Not in your case. The simplest for an anonymous poster claiming some personal award is that they are lying.
Quite a bit but since your morals are whatever you wish you just rationalize the falsehood.
Wrong again, Shit Stain.....but maybe you can get Colin Cowturd to answer another question that I never asked.
What I asked was: Why are you here?......but now I realize it's probably to ensure your own pedophilia doesn't get exposed.
As much as yours.
Things Zigs alleged V2 got wrong:
1. Date of incident - Alleged V2 states he was certain of the date.
2. Locker Room layout - it isn't even close. he basically drew a rectangle
3. Date of when Jerry said he may be contacted - again he was off by 3-4 weeks which may be allowable if not for his absolute certainty of the date of the incident
4. When the last time was that he worked out with Jerry on campus - again he says clearly he worked out until 2002 while a member of the WB football team. Again not a problem except he now ties his FB career in HS to the date of the episode. So either he was lying about his FB career or about the date of the incident, or Jerry continued to bring kids on campus in violation of Tim's decree.
5. He says he quit TSM in 6th grade, but I have posted proof he stayed with the program until at least 9th grade.
6. Jerry had multiple contacts with this person in the months leading up to the GJP release.
I would also add that Jerry masterfully duped the wise sage Zig here. Jerry planted this person for Zig to find in the prison interview. He dropped enough clues that he knew Zig would chase down without ever naming him. Likely knowing the wonderboy Zig would out the kid for him.
By this logic, MM is also unreliable.
Perhaps he was just drawing the showers.
See above re: data uncertainty.
So now you admit he was a strapping football player...LOL. The latter is possible and doesn't preclude AM from being victim 2. Additionally, I think AM is just a bad witness which is why neither side called him to testify. He doesn't have a good memory and doesn't speak well.
What does "quit TSM" mean? Perhaps he meant he quit one program. Doesn't disprove anything.
So?
Jerry isn't that smart.
I see we are back to the "I know you are but what am I" defense...just like a teenaged schoolgirl.
No one on here talks about pedophilia more than you....so by YOUR "logic"....well, I already knew that.
