The only thing CR is privy to is how bad his premature ejaculation has been his entire life.
FC: Judge gives NCAA permission to file new response in Paterno lawsuit(updated w/ new NCAA filing)
- Thread starter LundyPSU
- Start date
I can buy this for many of them--but not all. I think Heinlein's quote is applicable for many in this case--and goes for Curley et al. as well. I don't think there were a lot of intentional villains in this case. Corbett and Surma, yes. They had axes to grind. Others, not so much. But we may find out differently when all the fact come to light--if they do.
"You have attributed conditions to villainy that simply result from stupidity".--Robert A. Heinlein
First I heard there were confidentiality agreements signed by anyone. You just make that shit up right now or is that one of the talking points your handlers gave you?
It's made up. Omar O'Neill is on record in his depo that confidentiality was promised to no one.
Why shouldn't he make stuff up? ALL of this stuff regarding CSS and Paterno is made up stuff.
Cruising Route 66
Well-Known Member
LMAO!
You're not only an idiot, you're obnoxious, arrogant, swarmy and elitist. Go f*** yourself!
didn't a professor file with the trustee appeal that he was never promised confidentiality?
LOL......its getting entertaining now.
CR just making shitt up out of whole cloth. LMAO
Cruising Route 66
Well-Known Member
LMAO!
CR is probably being perfectly honest here.
He is the male equivalent of a D.U.F.F.........lots of folks would pony up a couple of bucks to have him hang around.
Last edited:
I've seen this exact same crap on 2 different central Pa. rags, one in Scranton, one in York and one in Philadelphia.
I assure you all...you have no idea how amusing this thread is when you have michnitt and Jim on ignore. Without having to subject myself to their idiot rantings, all I am seeing is basically a textual representation of what it must sound like when constantly smacking ones palm to ones forehead.
Actually, this calls for a double facepalm. Does Jim get paid by Kenny, or is just a natural sycophant?
it is friggin hilarious, because I am sure both those idiots are responding to some of our posts, mustering up their most condescending wit . . . COMPLETELY aware we have them blocked and won't read it. but it doesn't stop them.
they are like Douchebag Terminators . . .
As opposed to "playing dirty"? Being paid by your masters to spread their crap on BWI? Playing like that?
bwifan
Well-Known Member
CR is probably being perfectly honest here.
He is the male equivalent of a D.U.F.F.........lots of folks would pony up a couple of bucks to have him hang around.
=
CR even makes the guy wearing road kill on his head look good!!!!!
Holy cow there is a raccoon on that dude's head... Come now Jim... You don't have a Peter Millar shirt on? Dresssing down to be with the little people and drink mass produced beer?
Cruising Route 66
Well-Known Member
LOL! So you think that's me in these pictures? Would you like to place a little wager to benefit charity that it's not? Crickets. Keep fishing Hop Sing.CR is probably being perfectly honest here.
He is the male equivalent of a D.U.F.F.........lots of folks would pony up a couple of bucks to have him hang around.
=
CR even makes the guy wearing road kill on his head look good!!!!!
Last edited:
see that's where you lose it CR - it is common knowledge that at least some of those people on that list do not......
Cruising Route 66
Well-Known Member
No one pays me. The fact you would even think such a thing tells me how really naive you are.
Cruising Route 66
Well-Known Member
NOT being a crook and a liar .....that might be a start? LOL
In the meantime....its July 9th, 2015 - and:
There are no "confidentiality agreements" and Freeh's "source data" are his instructions from Ken Frazier and Ron Tomalis.
A person of "good character" doesn't fabricate false charges against an ex-employee, something that seems to be a habit for Keith Masser.
Cruising Route 66
Well-Known Member
That's funny, in his Corman sworn deposition Omar McNeil said there were confidentiality agreements with the interviewees. Do you think he would risk his law license and career by perjuring himself to that assertion? I suggest you go read his deposition and then tell me what his motivation would be for jeopardizing his career.
Your last assertion is not worthy of comment. You and your friends offer nothing more than a myriad of stupid theories, speculations, and innuendos that makes you all look uninformed and dumb.
Cruising Route 66
Well-Known Member
Not that he wouldn't like it - just the same.
So, do we have a bet for charity? Well I'm waiting.
LOL......How can I make a wager with a "man" I never met.
Stop by sometime, though, and we can set things up.
In the meantime:
Cruising Route 66
Well-Known Member
Go read the F***en deposition again in its entirety before you make more of an ass out of yourself. And yes I know what an UpJohn Warning is. Why don't you tell me what your understanding of it is first.
They may not pay you in $$$, they pay you in sexual favors. Figures, you and Kenny and Keith and John, all "men" who hit from the other side of the plate. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Anyway, $$$ or sexual favors, you're a whore.
Cruising Route 66
Well-Known Member
LOL......How can I make a wager with a "man" I never met.
Stop by sometime, though, and we can set things up.
In the meantime:
You don't need to meet me to make a wager. We can do this right here and now. All the board members are eagerly watching to see if you stand behind your assertions or not or if you're a big gas bag that I know you to be. For charity! Are you in or out?
I did read it tool. Nowhere does he say anyone or everyone was guaranteed confidentiality. I've seen this same crap posted by your Philadelphia Phool buddy.
bwifan
Well-Known Member
Come on Jimmy don't get your knickers in a bunch.... How would you prove who you are to the board?
