lolMassive bonehead call on 4th and 4 in our own territory with 7 1/2 minutes to go. Otherwise, Franklin did ok. I’m generally good with him. Great recruiter, good coach. We had some bad calls against us, and missed opportunities
That is very frustrating.…….like fielding punts at the 5 or not fielding them at the 50.
Yeah you do. It’s the whole “philosophy” of Franklin being a “CEO” that is wrong with this team. We don’t need a CEO, we need a football coach who understands how to coach during a game, not just during the practice week. This man simply doesn’t have “it”. If you’re implying we shouldn’t give someone else an opportunity, well that’s a horrible stance to have.Great discussions in here, my only question really is for those who want Franklin fired. Is who do you guys actually want to hire that is realistic?
Franklin has a ton of faults and is not anything more than an average gameday head coach but you don't just fire a head coach to do so.
Please define “positive momentum”?Right now, I think it would be a mistake. I think there's a lot of positive momentum with the program still. If this momentum crashes and burns, then it becomes a realistic conversation. Also that buyout isn't getting too much cheaper anytime soon.
And James has had 10 years. How long did it take Kirby and Ryan? Hell how long did it take Harbaugh?Yeah you do. It’s the whole “philosophy” of Franklin being a “CEO” that is wrong with this team. We don’t need a CEO, we need a football coach who understands how to coach during a game, not just during the practice week. This man simply doesn’t have “it”. If you’re implying we shouldn’t give someone else an opportunity, well that’s a horrible stance to have.
Ryan Day was nobody until he was given a chance to be somebody. Kirby Smart was just a DC until he was given an opportunity to be somebody.
Your whole premise of arguing we should “stick” with Franklin because “nobody” else is available is a horrible stance to take. IMO.
Nobody is nobody until they are given a chance to be somebody. It’s kind of how life works.
The worst was going for it with 7:49 left or whatever it was. We might have still had a chance to win if he hadn't done that. It was basically surrendering. I'd rather have seen that in the 1st quarter when you had more time to overcome it if they got a quick score.Eh, I generally defend Franklin because I think he has done a good job with the program. However, there were several egregious decisions today.
Burning a timeout in the first quarter to only come out and punt on 4th down. If you’re going to do that at least run the play clock down and try to get them to jump. It didn’t hurt PSU, but timeout and clock management mistakes happen repeatedly.
Going for 2 on the touchdown? I’m still trying to make that make sense. Maybe I’m missing something, but that seemed off. Again, it didn’t hurt PSU but is something that makes you ask “WTF?”
I don’t often criticize play calling because if it works you look like a genius, and if it fails you look like a heel. But aren’t there times where you have 3rd and 3 and you know you’re going for it on 4th down? Don’t you run the ball to make it 4th and 1 or 2?
If it's all about the money then why is our NIL on the same level as Wake Forest?Franklin isn’t leaving on his own and the university leadership is not trying to make him. He could average 7-8 wins a year and still get an extension. The fans don’t matter nor does NCs, it’s all about the money and to many people give just for the experience.
I don't think a coaching change is realistic right now. I think we have to look at the rest of this year and next year and start a $50 million gofundme at that point if we think he needs to go.The problem is it’s an unwinable debate on a message board.
You have no idea who is interested because no one is going to declare interest for a job that is currently not open.
Then you’ll have dismissive debates that coaches X and Y are or aren’t realistic, (although neither side really knows).
You’ll get the “we could be Nebraska” countered by “it worked for Clemson and Georgia”. That’s all great but totally irrelevant when it comes to Penn St.
The bottom line is this is a decision for Kraft based on what he knows. The best we can do here is, based on the data set from the past 10 years, should Penn St be looking for a coaching change or not?
Harbaugh's career at Michigan was on life support a couple of years ago and he had to take a pay cut. These things can change, but you have to win these types of games.And James has had 10 years. How long did it take Kirby and Ryan? Hell how long did it take Harbaugh?
Fair enough. These decisions always have lots of moving parts. I would never fire a coach until after the season was completed and everything was taken into account. Decisions based on ‘emotion of the moment’ never end well.I don't think a coaching change is realistic right now. I think we have to look at the rest of this year and next year and start a $50 million gofundme at that point if we think he needs to go.
Don’t worry, the same posters calling for Franklin’s head won’t like the next guy either, so there’s that.Fair enough. These decisions always have lots of moving parts. I would never fire a coach until after the season was completed and everything was taken into account. Decisions based on ‘emotion of the moment’ never end well.
Ill go with the "if you cant beat them, hire their staff approach" It's a big risk, but I'd try to get Hartline from OSU.Great discussions in here, my only question really is for those who want Franklin fired. Is who do you guys actually want to hire that is realistic?
Franklin has a ton of faults and is not anything more than an average gameday head coach but you don't just fire a head coach to do so.
Horrible coach on gameday. Unfortunately they will not fire him. They are invested in a guy who will do better than average, but never take us to the elite level. Calls on game day are horrible. Examples just from the first half. 1. 3rd and 1, sort of middle of the field, we throw!!! kill a good drive. Another drive, we run for 22 yard, then 15. So instead of sticking with it, we decide to start trying to throw!!!!. Guy is clueless on gameday!!!! Especially in big games. I am getting my sign ready for next week. Franklin Must Go!!!!Only thing elite about Franklin is his pay.
After last years OSU loss I fully expected Allar to see more meaningful action. A few respected posters lit into me, and while I wasn't a Clifford hater, I found myself in that seemingly weekly 6 year Soap Opera.We didn't lose this game because Hardy failed to field a punt. We lost because our quarterback is a kid and he wasn't even close to mentally strong enough to play in a big game.
Bottom line is that not playing Drew in games like last seasons' MSU finale hurt us today. He simply wasn't ready.
So, Hardy, Kalen, Kobe, Jacobs gaffs didn't impact the outcome of the game?We didn't lose this game because Hardy failed to field a punt. We lost because our quarterback is a kid and he wasn't even close to mentally strong enough to play in a big game.
This is a good take. Compare the QB play of tOSU. That kid was just as rattled and shaky at times. They had quick drops and fired the ball to neutralize a rush they knew was coming from our DL. Granted they have Grade A receivers who get separation, but we failed to target a true freshman CB and overall seemed to have no plan other than to run the same tired plays you describe into the teeth of a run blitzing defense. The lack of a plan and adjustments were evident.So, Hardy, Kalen, Kobe, Jacobs and gaffs didn't impact the outcome of the game?
Nor did Yurcick's insistence on treating this game as a slow progression check off practice game like PSU was playing Delaware again?
The playing the entire game like you are trying to run out the clock experiment has to be shelved along with the delayed hand off BS.
Funny how Franklin embraced this approach prior to the OSU game then then seemed to have turned on Yurcick in his post game.
If PSU keeps running the delayed hand off shit against UM totally neutralizing Drews mobility in the floating pocket and killing the play action while rendering the running game moot, PSU will get blown off their home field turf.
Your whole premise of arguing we should “stick” with Franklin
You are correct. This tells me Franklin is a smart business person, other areas not so much. It also tells me Franklin looks out for Franklin which permeates into his leadership style. It’s in the way he answers (or dances around questions) postgame. He encourages recognition of the “individual” over the team. He encourages “money” over team and community. The fact that Franklin has locked himself into this contract without an “out” for the University tells you everything you need to know about him as a leader. He isn’t a leader. He’s an individual who pounced on his “golden opportunity” selfishly I might add. In a way, he did exactly what we are warned against biblically….he took all the riches of the world for himself……it’s quite revealing of the individual and his product.The actual premise is $56 million. It begins there and ends there.
Going for it on 4th down was one of the more inexplicable calls in my memory. It's a one score game. You have all your timeouts and a great defense. How can you not pin OSU deep?The worst was going for it with 7:49 left or whatever it was. We might have still had a chance to win if he hadn't done that. It was basically surrendering. I'd rather have seen that in the 1st quarter when you had more time to overcome it if they got a quick score.
Not sure about going for 2. I think the thought was to try to win the game in regulation if they could get the ball back.
What's the probability of scoring on a 2-point conversion when the other team is ranked in the top 10?If you go for two before the first one and convert
, you can kick the XP to win…miss it, and you can still go for two to take it to OT.
Simplistically, if probability of winning in OT is 50%, probability of making the XP is 100%, and making each two point conversion is 50%…then scoring twice and going for 2 after the first one gives you a 62.5% chance of winning vs the traditional 50% chance. It’s why you’re seeing coaches that understand analytics following this strategy more and more.
Excellent question! However, we are supposed to believe the statistics tell the “whole story”….right? Follow the statistics they say…..statistics are crafted lies…..statistics will tell whatever story you want them to tell….rarely do they tell the truth…..What's the probability of scoring on a 2-point conversion when the other team is ranked in the top 10?
How do I give this a hundred likes!!!!Going for it 4th down was one of the more inexplicable calls in my memory. It's a one score game. You have all your timeouts and a great defense. How can you not pin OSU deep?
I’m sure it’s higher than you think…but it would also raise the question of what the probability of winning it OT would be against a top 10 team…it all plays into it.What's the probability of scoring on a 2-point conversion when the other team is ranked in the top 10?
Yeah but its not about coaching, it all about the jimmy and the joes. NotI wonder the player * ratings between Utah and USC - yet Utah COACHING finds a way to have a backup walkon QB play well enough to win.
I would substitute “occasionally” for “but never.”Maybe this is the best we can do. Ranked somewhere in the 7-15 range, a news years bowl, but never contending for the playoffs.
Georgia, Bama and Ohio State got to that level because of coaching changes. Bama wasn't Bama after Bryant until Saban. Georgia was basically us until Smart. Bruce and Cooper weren't the same as Hayes and it was Tressel that changed that.I would substitute “occasionally” for “but never.”
But, yes, this is who Penn State is in the grand scheme of things.
UGa, Bama, Bucknuts are who they are.
Pitt is who it is.
Kent State, UMass, etc are who they are.
PSU likely needs to sell more of its soul to move up that ladder to “elite” football status.
Then it's time to sell our soul if that's what it means. Call Pegula.I agree.
But PSU can’t get to that next level with the status quo. The additional $$$ it would take in head coach buyout/salary, assistant coach salary and NIL to step up is what I mean by “selling its soul.”
Without that commitment, PSU will remain who it is.
This is not the best we can do. during 1993-2011 Penn State won seven times against Ohio State. At Franklin's current pace it will take him 60 more years to get to seven wins against Ohio State. On the flip side, Paterno's teams were often uncompetitive vs OSU when they didn't win. Franklin's teams usually have competitive games with OSU, but losing every single one of those is obviously a bad sign. Under the old Paterno model we probably would have contended for the playoffs once every four or five years, if the playoffs had existed.Maybe this is the best we can do. Ranked somewhere in the 7-15 range, a news years bowl, but never contending for the playoffs.
Yup, win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. .......... win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan.Same shit every season
But maybe we get to beat Deion in the San Antonio Bowl and have Tex Mex.Yup, win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. .......... win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan. win 10-11 game but lose to OSU and Michigan.