It suggests that the university doesn't know how to conduct an election.The 97% of living alumni who didn't bother to vote in the very recent trustee election suggest something entirely different.
It suggests that the university doesn't know how to conduct an election.The 97% of living alumni who didn't bother to vote in the very recent trustee election suggest something entirely different.
It suggests that the university doesn't know how to conduct an election.
That is, of course, part of the issue. But not *all* of it. Just looking at the Alumni Association for one, where a small group of insiders have taken a once democratic institution and turned it into their own private playground. That has absolutely nothing to do with Paterno. But it mimics what the BOT did. Which also had nothing to do with Paterno. We are not an elitist place. A state university cannot be (elite education, yes). But these moves smack of elitism--and it is not the Penn State I knew and loved.
The 97% of living alumni who didn't bother to vote in the very recent trustee election suggest something entirely different.
Guys like you and Dandrea like to conveniently forget that the PSAA survey uses a random sample. This means that the results -- such as 80% of alumni being unhappy with the board -- are representative of alumni in general. It is not the PS4RS crowd filling out the survey, it is a cross-section of all living alumni.
Well, it's been around everywhere in the University, Joe included. But that is not unique to Penn State.We just didn't see it as clearly at the upper levels as we do now. And the changes, for one, in the AA are quite recent.
Corman got the ball rolling and won a huge victory. No lawyer
Corman won a huge victory. There are no good lawyers in this country who would see his clients demands met and then risk blowing it all in a trial THAT DOES NOT HAVE TO TAKE PLACE BECAUSE THE DEFENDANTS MET THE DEMANDS OF THE PLANTIF. Why does anybody continue to float this really mind boggling scenerio where you go to trial after your demands are met? Don't you realize how devoid of reason that view is?
Riiiiiight, you just go ahead keeping thinking that. He gave up the battle when there was more discovery to happen, and then made to look like a fool after the agreement was reached and announced. And were is the support for reforming the Board? crickets
Wow, RED ink. I don't recall suggesting a conspiracy. Ever. Well you recall wrongly. Continually searching for "the truth" when the truth has always been out there front and center clearly suggests a notion of nefariousness and conspiracy on your part. But that red ink gets me thinking that you are getting worked up just like your boy Eric. Think of of it less as getting worked up and more pointing out the obvious to someone with vision problems. Its a long game for me. You guys are suddenly acting like you sense it might not be a long game--like your time is getting short. You're right, time is getting short .....for you guys. We have a 28 point lead late in the fourth quarter and Witvoet in our back pocket. The clock is winding down and the best part is when the clock expires on C/S/S, I'll still be here saying I told you so and Freeh got it right. Then what will you do? Rave on. This is going to be the best part of all.
A large portion of the ~120 million went towards position scholarships. But what do I know, right?
Did you pull those out of your Michael's scrap book because they're likely the only ones still in existence. All long gone, forgotten about, and relegated to people's trash recycling . Maybe you should go down into your basement, print up a few hundred more on your Gutenberg press, and then stand on the corner by McLanahan's handing them out to little old ladies as they pass by. LOL!
And the answer is still an emphatic NO!
The final days of CR......"Kenny, Karen, John....why have you forsaken me?"
and then he will cuddle with Bernie McCue and condemn all the bad bad Joebots he believes made his life so pathetic
Hey, CR: This is the final proof that you are the rutgersal of the "move on" club.
It suggests that the university doesn't know how to conduct an election.
It is a compliment. To you.LOL! I'll take that as a compliment.
Exactly. People like 66 and the BoT love to fixate on stats like that not because they have any true meaning but because they think it agrees with their opinion.
I'd say voting was down because alumni saw that there were 3 candidates for 3 positions- why vote in that when obviously all 3 are moving on? Then the alumni are just disgusted because no matter what they vote, 66's buddies just rig the set up and manipulate the BoT numbers to make sure they have no power. After a while people see the writing on the wall with the corrupt practices and no longer participate.
If you want to know what people think of the BoT- just remember when they put Erickson and Joyner on the field at halftime a few years ago and the boos came raining down. The arrogance of the BoT to think everyone loves them except a tiny minority is truly delusional.
Voting was also down because the admin has been removing complainers from the voting rolls. It was also down because they use a shitty service that gets caught by spam filters and they don't bother to let alums know about the ballots using any other means -- e.g. snail mail postcards and PSU social media accounts. The Admin does not want alumni to vote.
Voting was also down because the admin has been removing complainers from the voting rolls. It was also down because they use a shitty service that gets caught by spam filters and they don't bother to let alums know about the ballots using any other means -- e.g. snail mail postcards and PSU social media accounts. The Admin does not want alumni to vote.
Voting was also down because the admin has been removing complainers from the voting rolls. It was also down because they use a shitty service that gets caught by spam filters and they don't bother to let alums know about the ballots using any other means -- e.g. snail mail postcards and PSU social media accounts. The Admin does not want alumni to vote.
The final days of CR......"Kenny, Karen, John....why have you forsaken me?"
No one is forsaking me. Just as Christ left his disciples to carry on his work, K/K/J will leave theirs and I'll be here to support them as well. Keith, Keith, Rich, Dan, Walt, Eric, etal.
LOL As I said, more pity than outrage.
NOTHING should be more heartening to those who desire the truth....to those who look forward to the day when Penn State is no longer held in the clutches of these despicable Pirates....as this:
CR is the best they got.
Regardless of what the turnout was, more people voted for the alumni trustees than any other members of the Board.
And more than in elections pre Nov. 2011.
The 97% of living alumni who didn't bother to vote in the very recent trustee election suggest something entirely different.
What do you know? Let's start by seeing if you can get the correct total amount of Pegula's gift? Then, why don't you tell us just how large a "large portion" is?
LOL! I'll take that as a compliment.
It's approx. 12%. Why are you getting so angry about this? We are doing better now than we ever have. Is that a bad thing??
And I am sorry, I transposed numbers. It was ~$102 million.
But of course the reason there was no upward state opposition this go round is because the OG know they don't have the support of the alumni.
The 97% of living alumni who didn't bother to vote in the very recent trustee election suggest something entirely different.
I'm not angry. You just toss numbers around willy-nilly and make statements that have no foundation, which is why you will never be anything more than a glorified bookkeeper. And the portion of Pegula's gift that was designated for funding the hockey scholarships was part of the 2012 numbers.