Too bad. It would be a real keyboard donnybrook.I think he's "moody". He can go long spells between tirades....I think we're in one of those spells.
Too bad. It would be a real keyboard donnybrook.I think he's "moody". He can go long spells between tirades....I think we're in one of those spells.
I'm pretty sure the poster has been here before. He has been on a time out of his own for a while. It will come to you. He's taken with the color blue (note the eyes), but has chosen not to use it for his font this time. He's also significantly reduced the size of his font. He isn't "Joking" around any more. He doesn't like the Beatles either.I dont recall seeing you around this joint before. Are you new around here? I kinda like your naïveté.
Hard to throw deep if you can't pass block, which we could not do well vs OSU. I do agree with more play action passes especially if they are thrown in running situations. That should help with the pass blocking and freeze the linebackers.Lets skip all the fire Donavan and other topic killers and get to the meat of it all.
If I was coaching, I would bench Hackenberg and give McSorley and Stevens a chance. QB's who can move out of the pocket and throw on the run to account for our lack of depth at O-Line.
Now you have Barkley sitting back there as a homerun hitter. You can definitely use play action more with him, but you also have a QB who can move if the play breaks down
I really like Hackenberg, but he is playing like he needs an all star O-Line in front of him and that just is not going to happen during his tenure at Penn State.
At Receiver throw deep more often. Let your guys go one on one and make a play. This isn't pro football. You don't have all star corners playing against your wide receiver every game. Let them make a play more often. Jerry Rice wasn't the fastest receiver to ever play. But he made plays when you threw him the ball.
Defense I don't change much. Maybe keep a safety a little closer to support the run since our Linebackers struggled a little bit against a good running teams.
Brutally honest but I love it. So much truth in your post I cannot begin to praise it enough!
So you'd bench Hack whose strength is throwing the ball down the field (but has struggled at this because no one is open and he doesn't have time to let plays develop) and your new strategy is to throw downfield more often. Brilliant.Lets skip all the fire Donavan and other topic killers and get to the meat of it all.
If I was coaching, I would bench Hackenberg and give McSorley and Stevens a chance. QB's who can move out of the pocket and throw on the run to account for our lack of depth at O-Line.
Now you have Barkley sitting back there as a homerun hitter. You can definitely use play action more with him, but you also have a QB who can move if the play breaks down
I really like Hackenberg, but he is playing like he needs an all star O-Line in front of him and that just is not going to happen during his tenure at Penn State.
At Receiver throw deep more often. Let your guys go one on one and make a play. This isn't pro football. You don't have all star corners playing against your wide receiver every game. Let them make a play more often. Jerry Rice wasn't the fastest receiver to ever play. But he made plays when you threw him the ball.
Defense I don't change much. Maybe keep a safety a little closer to support the run since our Linebackers struggled a little bit against a good running teams.
If I was coaching I would "make" the OL more TALENTED. Since we all know that is easy to fix. With better coaching they would all be a REAL Big 10 OL, really ???
So I would first FIRE me and then "start all over when these DAMN sanctions are lifted".
Then I would give the NEW coaching staff "3-4" years to bring in "their" own players (Barkley, Polk, and Reid come to mind).
BUT, first get rid of Hack and play Stevens and/or Mc Sorley (they are younger and can get killed). Who would miss them ????
Does ANYONE actually watch these games? Take a minute or two to LOOK at the blocking for "pass" protection (protection? who the hell am I kidding).
I give all the credit in the world to this staff, they have never thrown these kid under the bus. As fans (which means we really know nothing) get to do that !!!
And the Media ?? Kind of a mixed bag, don't you think ?
I recall many fans pounding DiNardo before the season started since he said he saw NO improvement in our OL in practice. So he wondered where all the optimism was coming from? 10-2 ??
Next question ????
Best post in weeks. Just watch the individual Oline matchups every play. It's ugly and it can't be fixed right now. Yes, we had some success running the ball but that was largely zone blocking with Barkley making more out of those plays than he deserved to get. Plus we benefited on several uncalled holding penalties vs. Ohio State. When these guys have to man up in pass protection, make adjustments on Dline stunts, pick up blitzers, etc. they can't get it done on a consistent basis. Take what you can get, try to improve week by week but every game is going to be a struggle.If I was coaching I would "make" the OL more TALENTED. Since we all know that is easy to fix. With better coaching they would all be a REAL Big 10 OL, really ???
So I would first FIRE me and then "start all over when these DAMN sanctions are lifted".
Then I would give the NEW coaching staff "3-4" years to bring in "their" own players (Barkley, Polk, and Reid come to mind).
BUT, first get rid of Hack and play Stevens and/or Mc Sorley (they are younger and can get killed). Who would miss them ????
Does ANYONE actually watch these games? Take a minute or two to LOOK at the blocking for "pass" protection (protection? who the hell am I kidding).
I give all the credit in the world to this staff, they have never thrown these kid under the bus. As fans (which means we really know nothing) get to do that !!!
And the Media ?? Kind of a mixed bag, don't you think ?
I recall many fans pounding DiNardo before the season started since he said he saw NO improvement in our OL in practice. So he wondered where all the optimism was coming from? 10-2 ??
Next question ????
Lets skip all the fire Donavan and other topic killers and get to the meat of it all.
If I was coaching, I would bench Hackenberg and give McSorley and Stevens a chance. QB's who can move out of the pocket and throw on the run to account for our lack of depth at O-Line.
Now you have Barkley sitting back there as a homerun hitter. You can definitely use play action more with him, but you also have a QB who can move if the play breaks down
I really like Hackenberg, but he is playing like he needs an all star O-Line in front of him and that just is not going to happen during his tenure at Penn State.
At Receiver throw deep more often. Let your guys go one on one and make a play. This isn't pro football. You don't have all star corners playing against your wide receiver every game. Let them make a play more often. Jerry Rice wasn't the fastest receiver to ever play. But he made plays when you threw him the ball.
Defense I don't change much. Maybe keep a safety a little closer to support the run since our Linebackers struggled a little bit against a good running teams.
(2) Assign an entire office to find a punter - Field position continues to be the cancer that spreads to everything else. You cannot play 40 minutes of the game on your side of the field. Until that changes, everything else is just a pipedream.
Currently Nordin is committed but is listed as a Kicker. Gillikin from GA is committed and listed as a Punter.
More like Hack can't escape his own two feet. Mobile QB that can move out of the pocket. Whoever is at QB doesn't need to throw the ball more than 35 or 40 yards.So you'd bench Hack whose strength is throwing the ball down the field (but has struggled at this because no one is open and he doesn't have time to let plays develop) and your new strategy is to throw downfield more often. Brilliant.
Goodluck with that one!I would get rid of all the arm chair Chicken Little coaches here.
Without those hints, I would have been in the dark. Many thanks for the en"light"enment.I'm pretty sure the poster has been here before. He has been on a time out of his own for a while. It will come to you. He's taken with the color blue (note the eyes), but has chosen not to use it for his font this time. He's also significantly reduced the size of his font. He isn't "Joking" around any more. He doesn't like the Beatles either.
I'm pretty sure the poster has been here before. He has been on a time out of his own for a while. It will come to you. He's taken with the color blue (note the eyes), but has chosen not to use it for his font this time. He's also significantly reduced the size of his font. He isn't "Joking" around any more. He doesn't like the Beatles either.
OMG This is funny as all hell.! This has to be the biggest collection of retarded people ever assembled!Without those hints, I would have been in the dark. Many thanks for the en"light"enment.
Not worth celebrating. The return of "he who shall no longer be named?" That would be worth celebrating. I'm afraid he isn't coming back. Oh well.Without those hints, I would have been in the dark. Many thanks for the en"light"enment.
Core reactive meltdown has commenced.OMG This is funny as all hell.! This has to be the biggest collection of retarded people ever assembled!
Ok ok....... I will play along... I am the Boogie man, Freddy Crugar, Jason Voorhees, Your mother when she used to smack you in the head causing brain damage.
I have to laugh really guys feel free to tell me who I am supposed to be so I can go review their posts. I want to play along too.
You guys must have had serious issues as children!!
Probably shouldn't engage the poor guy.Core reactive meltdown has commenced.
Core reactive meltdown has commenced.
Last night I incorrectly described him (aka Get Real, Bushy) as "moody". I should have used the adjective "pouty".Not worth celebrating. The return of "he who shall no longer be named?" That would be worth celebrating. I'm afraid he isn't coming back. Oh well.
Oh come on please do. I want to play along. This is going to be entertaining. I mean I realize a few people might not have all the marbles upstairs. But WOW this group of people is about as paranoid as it gets. Please dont sleep with firearms around. You may hurt someone.Probably shouldn't engage the poor guy.
Yeah. You can bet he'll come back with bullhorns on a giant black sedan and guns a blazin'.Last night I incorrectly described his a "moody". I should have used "pouty". He'll be back. Sometimes it takes a random act on the field or even something else, seeming less important.
My bet is that this time it will be more Texans-related than PSU-related.
Last night I incorrectly described his a "moody". I should have used "pouty". He'll be back. Sometimes it takes a random act on the field or even something else, seeming less important.
My bet is that this time it will be more Texans-related than PSU-related.
What if I advised you that I am actually a Mental Health Professional Reporter?I think I need to do some homework and figure out how much BS you are pulling right now with the reporter story.
Maybe its time I take a peek behind the curtain because this is either the largest collection of Gomer Pyles ever assembled or each of you needs to be evaluated by a Mental Health Professional.
Oh no. Now the other guy is really getting paranoid. He thinks you were describing him when you were describing a true board legend. Time to put him on virtual ignore. Nothing good can come of this.Last night I incorrectly described him (aka Get Real, Bushy) as "moody". I should have used the adjective "pouty".
He'll be back. Sometimes it takes a random act on the field or something even seemingly less important.
My bet is that this time it will be more Texans-related than PSU-related.
If I told you what I do for a living I think you would probably hush up. Especially if you were honest about your profession.What if I advised you that I am actually a Mental Health Professional Reporter?
If you ever determine what I do for a profession, you should be sadly disappointed...for both of us. Isn't my board name sufficient disclosure?If I told you what I do for a living I think you would probably hush up. Especially if you were honest about your profession.
I have the means and the contacts to quite easily figure out a few things. Your conduct is unprofessional even on this type of board. And quite honestly I think based on the attacks a few have placed on me that I start throwing a few punches here myself.
If you ever determine what I do for a profession, you should be sadly disappointed...for both of us. Isn't my board name sufficient disclosure?
Good luck the rest of the way. I'm headed off to read about entropy.If you ever determine what I do for a profession, you should be sadly disappointed...for both of us. Isn't my board name sufficient disclosure?
Your good but I will also find out about you too enjoy your evening!Good luck the rest of the way. I'm headed off to read about entropy.
Whatever you do, don't get it confused with Enthalpy. Like many others on this board, they don't get along well.Good luck the rest of the way. I'm headed off to read about entropy.
Must be the constant pressure.Whatever you do, don't get it confused with Enthalpy. Like many others on this board, they don't get along well.
Why thank you. Same to you.Your good but I will also find out about you too enjoy your evening!
Oh no. Now the other guy is really getting paranoid. He thinks you were describing him when you were describing a true board legend. Time to put him on virtual ignore. Nothing good can come of this.
Good luck the rest of the way. I'm headed off to read about entropy.
Not worth celebrating. The return of "he who shall no longer be named?" That would be worth celebrating. I'm afraid he isn't coming back. Oh well.